Michelle Mccottry Argumentative Essay

Improved Essays
On February 1, 2001, Michelle McCottry called 911 and told the operator her ex-boyfriend, Adrian Davis, had beat her with his fists and fled the scene. Davis was arrested and charged with felony violation of a domestic no-contact order. During the trial, McCottry did not testify and the prosecution used McCottry’s 911 call as evidence of her injuries caused by Davis (Davis v. Washington, n.d.). Davis objected to the use of the 911 call as evidence, citing his Sixth Amendment confrontation clause (Davis v. Washington, n.d.). This clause states that the defendant has the right to confront any witness against him. His objection was denied as her 911 call was not testimonial, and he was convicted (Davis v. Washington, n.d.). The issue …show more content…
Washington was decided based on Hammon v. Indiana (Hammon v. Indiana, n.d.). In this case, Hershel Hammon was charged with domestic abuse after police responded to a call at his house, questioned him and his wife, and took a statement from his wife (Hammon v. Indiana, n.d.). The court used this statement and entered it as evidence, as Mrs. Hammon did not testify, citing that it was an excited utterance, and therefore was not testimony, rather it was evidence. Davis appealed his conviction on the basis that his wife was not under duress, nor was there an immediate emergency which she was helping resolve. Instead, the police officer took her statement in a calm setting and she signed it (Hammon v. Indiana, n.d.). The U.S. Supreme Court upheld Davis’ appeal because he was unable to cross examine his wife’s statement. Based on this decision, the court decided in Davis v. Washington that in the case of an emergency, the excited utterance and 911 call can be used as evidence as they are not testimonial in nature (Hammon v. Indiana, n.d.).

In conclusion, in the case of Davis v. Washington, McCottry’s 911 call was not considered testimony. Since she was simply calling 911 to resolve an emergency, her statement was evidence of the crime and therefore did not violate Davis’ Sixth Amendment right to cross examine a witness. Furthermore, this 911 call was not even considered a witness statement due to it being classified as evidence. Rather than telling a story of the past, McCottry was seeking aid and because of this, her 911 call was

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Kiara Rivas Philosophy 25 Due Date: 5/6/2015 Mock Trial: U.S v. Dominique Stephens The case I am presenting today is about a woman who admits to having killed her husband and is being charged with first degree murder. The woman’s name is Dominque Stephens and Mrs. Stephens claims that she has acted in self-defense after suffering many years of domestic violence in her marriage.…

    • 2831 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Amy Tan uses the precious jewelry that loses value when the Chinese mothers pass it down to their American grown children to demonstrate that the mother’s hope and wisdom also possess no value for the child because it was molded by a different culture that does not fit in with their way of life. In an effort to help their children, the mothers only place a heavier burden on them to carry their Chinese culture while balancing it with their American lifestyle. Topic Sentence 1: The Chinese mothers pass down their jewelry when their children are in a predicament presented to them by their American life; however, the jewelry does not possess qualities the American grown children need and therefore the mothers cannot use it to help them.…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the April of 1992, Chris McCandless set out from South Dakota to Fairbanks Alaska. Five months later, McCandless's body was found rotting inside an abandoned bus. Chris McCandless had run away from his family and had hoped to survive in the wild with only the bare necessities. McCandless was a fool for what he did, he was a hard working, and vigilant man, yet he embarked without a backup plan, nor the proper supplies to survive out in the wild.…

    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the court case The People of the State of Colorado v. Sandra L. Jacobson, Jacobson is convicted of homicide. The homicide resulted from her truck colliding with a taxi cab while she was driving under the influence. There were two passengers in the taxi at the time of the collision and both were killed. Jacobson appealed the court’s decision on the basis that the trial court did not allow her attorneys to gauge whether or not the jury had become biased due to mid-trial publicity that included inadmissible information. On the fourth day of the trial, the Court was made aware of the fact that a local television network would be covering the incident that led to this trial on its evening news program.…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Scottsboro Case A case that was unfair to the defendants and to the society of mankind. The Scottsboro Case first started on March 25,1931 9 young black men were wrongly accused.…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Judge then handed the floor to the plaintiff attorney Richard Whitley introduced himself and his client which was named Michelle Moore. The defendant name was Joshua Muniz. He stated that the case was a motor vehicle accident and had already been trialed at a criminal court, which Defendant Muniz had plead guilty and was on probation and has severed community service for committing the crime. Moore was now suing for Punitive damages and mental anguish for damages that were occurred during the accident.…

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Chapter four, titled Contracts and Intentional Torts, pertains to the various laws surrounding physician and patient relationships. A major case that is presented in the chapter pertains to a woman’s false imprisonment by a physician. The case is known as Stowers v. Wolodzko, and it outlines the physician’s rights versus a patient’s rights in a legal lawsuit. The case depicts the restriction of a person’s freedom, assault and battery, and malpractice.…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the case, Brady v. Maryland 373 U.S. 83, Certiorari was granted to a decision of the Court of Appeals of Maryland to consider whether petitioner was denied a federal right when the appeals court restricted its grant of a new murder trial to the question of punishment, leaving the determination of guilt undisturbed. The appeals court granted a retrial after holding that suppression of evidence by the state violated petitioner's rights under the Due Process Clause, U.S. Constitutional Amendment XIV (Law School Case Briefs, 2013). Furthermore, there was a judgement that had granted the petitioner a new murder trial that was solely based on the issue of his punishment. Since the petitioner was convicted of murder and then sentenced to death in his first trail with the Maryland Court, the petitioner was then informed that the Maryland Courts had withheld a statement that indicated that another individual had admitted that exact homicide. What the Supreme Court had concluded from this case was that, because of the suppression of the evidence was in favorable to an accused upon the request that violated the Due Process Clause required the court to a…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Finally, Under FRE 801 (d)(2) if a defendant’s own statements aren’t hearsay because the law “says so” then does that mean even though the bystander isn’t there to testify to the truth of the defendant’s statement, that it should be dismissed (Cummins and Marlowe)? Another consideration I had was if the defendant made his comment to a bystander was out of a rambling verbal exclamation. I suppose one side will absolute try to speak up, if the parties had attorneys present (Cummins and…

    • 1351 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    On the summer day of June 22, a Van Boekel Hog Farms slaughterhouse transportation truck headed to Fearman's Pork Inc. was stationary, Anita Krajnc, the co-founder of Toronto Pig Save, and another activist stopped to give the pigs water and document their experience. The driver confronted the two women and told them to stop giving the pigs water. While Krajnc asked the driver to show compassion, he threatened her with physical assault and called the police. Now Krajnc is being charged with criminal mischief -- interference with the use, enjoyment of and operation of property -- and fined $5,000 for showing thirsty pigs compassion. Although there are reports that she's willing to go to jail.…

    • 176 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Patrece Peterson Case

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages

    COMPLAINT Patrece Petersen, a defendant, who was prosecuted by Laura Marshard of the Cape and Islands District Attorney’s Office, sent a complaint on October 20, 2014, alleging that Marshard met privately with a witness in Petersen’s criminal case, after the witness had been assigned counsel due to a potential 5th Amendment issue (Dkt# 1435CR000551). As a result of this complaint, the office has received information from, Judge Chin, regarding other instances of misconduct by Marshard. Marshard has allegedly violated Mass.R.Prof. C.3.8 (d). FACTS…

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United States of America’s First Ten Amendments is known as the Bill of Rights. The Bill of Rights guarantees certain freedom to individuals residing in the United States of America. This right includes, freedom of speech, religion, press, the right to a speedy trial by jury, and right to privacy. Some of these rights are still guaranteed even if one is accused of a crime. According to the United States of America’s criminal law, one who is accused of a crime is still considered innocent unless proven guilty in a criminal court of law.…

    • 1064 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Facts and Procedural History: Once the individual, Graham, realized the commencement of a low insulin is being reacted, he had the inclination to purchase an orange juice to thwart the low insulin reaction. Upon arriving the convenience store where he spotted a line of customers waiting for their turn at the checkout line. Graham rushed out of the store without paying for the content. An officer spotted the swift activity and decided to do an investigative stop and called for backup.…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    James Stevens also clarified to Brenton Butler’s lawyer that he does not recall talking to an officer about the description of the individual who murdered his wife. The eyewitness in this case was confident on his statement but lack on being reasonable throughout the process of testifying it. This shows how Steven’s eyewitness evidence was not precise despite of how confident. In the article “Descriptive Eyewitness Testimony: The Influence of Emotionality, Racial…

    • 1671 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Verdict, starring Paul Newman, portrays legal ethics and justice in a troublesome yet intriguing light. This touching story had its complexities in various forms. There were ethical violations, laws broken and personal values being challenged. It shed light on how discrepancies in the healthcare system can cause a life, and how law in the justice system can easily work for you or against you. One can gain immense perspective after watching this film on how brutal and cutthroat the justice system can be.…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays