Davidson Listening Continuum Analysis

This week’s readings informed me on many things I tend to overlook on a daily basis. Davidson’s “listening continuum” and Rosh’s case on establishing authenticity as a leader were the two articles that stood out to me the most. After reading the articles, I gained a better sense of what type of person I am, and what type of person I strive to be.
I have always thought that I had strong listening skills, however after reading Davidson’s article, I might have to rethink whether I am a good listener or not. I did not know that a listener’s response could be categorized in so many ways. As I went through the “Listening Continuum”, I realized that I give reflective responses most of the time. For example, during interviews or conversations with people in a higher position than me, I gravitate towards the use of “silence” and “restatement” simultaneously, and “clarification”. With friends, on the other hand, I would use reflective, middle range, and directive responses. Initially, I thought that since I understand the responses listed, I am a good listener, however, I came to realize that knowing when to use these responses was also very important. Sometimes I would accidentally offer advice that was not necessary or was silent for too long which can …show more content…
I resonated most with the “bumblers” and “inscrutable leaders”. At times, I find it difficult to share certain aspects of myself, while other times, I want to share, but not everyone appreciates it at the moment. Before reading this article, I always assumed I was just clumsy and dense and won’t be able to change. However, Rosh and Offerman’s “Five Step Path” gave me an option. I completely agreed on their idea of how a person has to figure out themselves first before relaying it to other people. Therefore, I will continue to discover who I am as a person, and express my most authentic self to