Showrunner is not a job for the weak, but it enables HBO to push their agenda through that people can watch the show the eyes of the showrunner. This enables the showrunner, such as David Simon, to pick up traits and attributes that are particular to that showrunner. David Simon for example was the showrunner for The Wire, Treme, and The Deuce. HBO’s strategy to market David Simon helped him be seen as intellectual to the publics eyes. Enabling him to engage and centralize his series around topics that are important to him. Not only did HBO glorify the showrunning position, but they actually shaped the idea to establish and art and culture form around it. I believe just like many other, that the author of these series should be able to push
…show more content…
This makes the job of a showrunner extremely difficult. As a series moves past the first season, the cast and production team may change but the ideas and theology beyond the show must stay the same to get returning viewers. “His expression ‘the mythology of coherence’ refers to the practice of seeking out, in the works of a single author, a systematic and coherent ‘message’ that transcends his/her texts, even to the extent of trying to create coherence where there are only scattered ideas and even downright contradictions…. It may turn out that some of the classic writers are not altogether consistent” (Jensen, Mikkel/Page 34). In other words, the showrunner or creative behind the series, as well as manager of all aspects. In Simon’s case his productions can be seen as a consistent extension of his urban issues in American society. All of these ideologies go into the understand of what a showrunner is capable of. With regards to David Simon his various works across a broad perspective encompass very similar themes, which makes me believe that most showrunners have an agenda of issues they wish to present. This examples above offer insight into the showrunner approach and the Hermeneutics of suspicion point. If show runners focus on the show, they can spiral into a diminishing decline because they aren’t paying attention to key detail behind the management of the …show more content…
If not, it could be the start of his decline. “According to Alisa Perren and Thomas Schatz, the term ‘showrunner’ first emerged in the US in the first half of the 1990s though the role is much older. It refers to writer-producers who have both creative and managerial responsibilities.” (Jensen, Mikke/ PG 36) We all know that showrunners have a lot to do with shaping the story but their visual outcome is brought to life by the director, production designers, and cinematographers. Even though many showrunners may have a critical role in writing they may be a bit more hands of with the final outcome to overcome their managerial duties. Another key role a showrunner must do is an on-set collaborator which is critical to the final product of the series. Showrunners play crucial roles by making sure the integrity of the show stays in tack. For years’ television had to many individual calling the shots. A strong willed showrunner takes away any confusing and fulfils the show how it was envisioned. Although the term showrunner is new to dis decade, past example can be collected from earlier produces. The idea of having one or a couple of figure heads, or showrunners, enable the television series to influence the same idea and concepts
This makes the job of a showrunner extremely difficult. As a series moves past the first season, the cast and production team may change but the ideas and theology beyond the show must stay the same to get returning viewers. “His expression ‘the mythology of coherence’ refers to the practice of seeking out, in the works of a single author, a systematic and coherent ‘message’ that transcends his/her texts, even to the extent of trying to create coherence where there are only scattered ideas and even downright contradictions…. It may turn out that some of the classic writers are not altogether consistent” (Jensen, Mikkel/Page 34). In other words, the showrunner or creative behind the series, as well as manager of all aspects. In Simon’s case his productions can be seen as a consistent extension of his urban issues in American society. All of these ideologies go into the understand of what a showrunner is capable of. With regards to David Simon his various works across a broad perspective encompass very similar themes, which makes me believe that most showrunners have an agenda of issues they wish to present. This examples above offer insight into the showrunner approach and the Hermeneutics of suspicion point. If show runners focus on the show, they can spiral into a diminishing decline because they aren’t paying attention to key detail behind the management of the …show more content…
If not, it could be the start of his decline. “According to Alisa Perren and Thomas Schatz, the term ‘showrunner’ first emerged in the US in the first half of the 1990s though the role is much older. It refers to writer-producers who have both creative and managerial responsibilities.” (Jensen, Mikke/ PG 36) We all know that showrunners have a lot to do with shaping the story but their visual outcome is brought to life by the director, production designers, and cinematographers. Even though many showrunners may have a critical role in writing they may be a bit more hands of with the final outcome to overcome their managerial duties. Another key role a showrunner must do is an on-set collaborator which is critical to the final product of the series. Showrunners play crucial roles by making sure the integrity of the show stays in tack. For years’ television had to many individual calling the shots. A strong willed showrunner takes away any confusing and fulfils the show how it was envisioned. Although the term showrunner is new to dis decade, past example can be collected from earlier produces. The idea of having one or a couple of figure heads, or showrunners, enable the television series to influence the same idea and concepts