David Hume's First Impression Analysis

Improved Essays
Register to read the introduction… In Section II, Of the Origin of Ideas, he states the difference “By the term impression, then, I mean all our more lively perceptions, when we hear, or see, or feel, or love, or hate, or desire, or will. And impressions are distinguished from ideas, which are less lively perceptions, of which we are conscious, when we reflect on any of those sensations or movements above mentioned.” After making this clear distinction, Hume offers a thought experiment as a potential counterexample to his own view that all simple ideas are copies of impressions. Hume’s famous “missing shade of blue” example is introduced to show that it is at least conceivable that the mind can generate an idea without first being exposed to the relevant sensory experience. This is a problem for philosophers because it appears to contradict what Hume had previously written. The “missing shade of blue” thought experiment examines the idea of someone who is well acquainted with a spectrum of colors except a particular shade of blue. …show more content…
Hume’s absence of concern might be explained by the fact that although this exception contradicts the claim that all simple ideas are preceded by simple impressions, this is not a problem because it is not Hume’s primary concern. The ideological solution to the “missing shade of blue” philosophical problem would encompass all of the resolutions aforementioned. This includes recognizing that Hume believed the problem to be a genuine counter example, a proper explanation that harmonizes well with other features of Hume’s epistemology and recognizes that Hume included the counterexample for a purpose. Although I have mentioned an array of solutions to this philosophical problem, standing alone prevents these arguments from being

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    As I started to read Racism Without Racists I became increasingly more uncomfortable. Not because I did not like the book, but because I was afraid that I would recognize Eduardo Bonilla-Silva’s words in myself. That I would have to see the ways in which my white privilege has caused me to spin my words to make myself appear less racist, or somehow pretend to be more marginalized than the minorities around me. I have to admit that when Bonilla-Silva said “I found that young, working-class women are more likely than any other segment of the white community to be racially progressive” (Bonilla-Silva 192), part of me breathed a sigh of relief. I am a young women from a working class family, I guess that means I am progressive right?…

    • 1114 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Essay 3 Given what we know or can safely assume to be true of animal brains and behaviors, do animals actually exhibit thought and reason? The answer depends in large measure on one’s definition of thought and reason. Philosophers René Descartes and David Hume hold conflicting views about the nature and possession of thought and reason and, as a result, offer starkly different arguments for and against the existence of thought and reason in animals. While Descartes maintains in Part Five of Discourse on Method that only humans are capable of conscious thought, Hume asserts that human and animal behaviors are not so different in Section Nine of his An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding.…

    • 1808 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Scottish Philosopher, David Hume explains that there is a “Standard of Taste”. He describes that this standard of taste by establishing the rule that the good critic needs strong sense. A certain expertise is developed by a critic through a lot of practice in comparison in a particular area. Hume would respond to the Bouguereau painting, “The Thank Offering”, as a form of bad art. While Solomon would defend this painting by stating, “it is the sentimentality of kitsch that makes kitsch kitsch”.…

    • 122 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    He argues that the analogy between the universe and human creations, such as machines is weak, since the universe is not really as obviously similar to a machine as the argument claims. The arrangement, composition, and workings of the universe are extremely different from a man-made machine. He explains that even a single and small difference between the effects of two things can reveal great differences between the causes. This refutation of the argument is plausible, since it shows that an argument from analogy only works effectively when the things we're comparing are extremely similar, but the universe is totally different from a machine or watch. Also, Hume argues that we have only limited exposure to a part of the universe, yet we're taking attributes based on imperfect observations of that small part, such as order, design, and intelligence and using them to make a claim about the whole universe.…

    • 1287 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    SCENARIO B Fact Check There are a few errors that are present within the scientific information of scenario B. First, it falsely informs the readers by stating that one of the three colors that the human eye is sensitive to is the color yellow. However, according to Lilienfeld et al. (2014), the Trichromatic theory actually suggest that the human eye contains specific photoreceptor cells, specifically cones, that are responsible for colored vision and are sensitive to the colors red, green, and blue.…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gel Electrophoresis Lab

    • 621 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Background info: DNA is in everyone’s body. So how would you tell the different DNA of each person from each other? Sure DNA is unique, but how can you measure it and look at it? If you were able to see the DNA cut up, could you tell from the pieces and sizes , which DNA belongs to which person? You can, using gel electrophoresis.…

    • 621 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    David Hume's Argument

    • 245 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Hume begins his argument by asserting that animals, just like humans, learn from experience and come to infer causal connections between events. Hume describes this principle by saying: “[animals] become acquainted with the more obvious properties of eternal objects, and gradually, from their birth, treasure up a knowledge of the nature of fire, water, earth, stones, heights, depths, &c. and of the effect, which result from their operation” (Hume, 70). In order to illustrate his point, Hume cites several examples: horses learn what heights they can safely leap, and dogs learn to fear the sight of a whip (Hume, 70). Furthermore, Hume claims that non-human animals certainly do not learn to make these inferences by means of reason or argument.…

    • 245 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To attack a piece of accepted knowledge is bold to say the least, and here Descartes’ focus is to better justify how one can credibly dispute anything. The idea of cutting an idea by the roots, as the tree metaphor is prominent, is new but also the way that is most effective in differentiating from the reality of life. Descartes poses the idea that as much as one can fool themselves to believe they are not dreaming, it is never certain whether we are in a physical conscious state. This idea is rather perplexing as, when looked deeper into, holds no faults. It can be said that any physical senses are not present in the dream state, but it is not necessarily true to everyone.…

    • 215 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Prompt 3 Author Ralph Waldo Emerson wrote a famous quote by him, he said “To be yourself in a world that is constantly trying to make you something else is the greatest accomplishment.” This quote relates to individuality and being to yourself meaning like should conquer own goal and lead to your own life. Don’t ever let anyone control your life, or tell you how live it. Do you agree or disagree with this statement Emerson wrote? Audiences who are reading this should ask themselves this question to understand this quote, go through all the accomplishments that they done by themselfs to see how individuality could be, and even see if they living their life the way they want, or not be forcing to live.…

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    To relate this to the blue “problem” - just because one has experienced various shades of blue doesn’t give any justification for the belief that another shade might exist. The upshot of this problem, though, is that people tend to nevertheless make such inferences (and seem to do so reliably). This wider epistemology could arguably “rescue” Hume from the missing shade dilemma, however; if one were to claim that they had an idea of the missing shade, but no antecedent impression of it, he may respond with a dichotomy. Which is more likely: a) that the missing shade is indeed a priori, or b) that they have seen this shade somewhere without realizing it or having forgotten that they once saw…

    • 1837 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Thoughts of the Collective Psychology presents several explanations for instances of indecision and the iconic angelic and fiendish voices inside the mind. The concept of dualism and fragmentation of the mind has existed since Aristotle and Plato, but Robert Louis Stevenson captured the quintessential belief behind dualism in his novella The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. Mr. Jekyll explores the duality of a human mind through theoretical experiments which eventually produce two antagonistic personalities, yet he guesses “that man will be ultimately known for a mere policy of multifarious, incongruous and independent denizens” (Stevenson 43). However, Jekyll’s experiments only provided two aspects of humanity, the kind, earnest appearance…

    • 1462 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    George Berkeley argues that an objective reality does not exist. He argues for idealism, the belief that the external world does not exist and only the mind and ideas do, by arguing against materialism, that an objective reality does exist. Berkeley believes that an objective reality does not exist because of issues that come with materialism. However, his points do not make much sense as he relies on faulty ideas. He presents his argument by mentioning how materialism is unverifiable; that we cannot verify there is an objective reality, pointless; there is no need to posit an external world, and incoherent; our senses cannot be external objects.…

    • 1136 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ralph Waldo Emerson and Henry David Thoreau, we could learn quite a bit from these two great artists in literature. They have created stories with such great and different meaning to their readers, and many quotes can be found in each one. Here are three quotes found in their stories, each with their own purpose. A quote by Emerson is “what I must do is all that concerns me, not what the people think”, one quote by Thoreau is “heaven is under our feet as well as over our heads”, and another quote by Thoreau is “if you have built castles in the air, your work need not be lost; that is where they should be. Now put the foundations under them”.…

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Two of the most intriguing schools of philosophy are the two which deal specifically with epistemology, or, what is better known as the origin of knowledge. Although they are not completely opposite of one another, they are argued in depth by two of the most famous philosophers in history. The origins of study in rationalism and empiricism can be found in the 17th century, during a time when various significant developments were made in the fields of astronomy and mechanics. These advancements undoubtedly led to the questions that probed the sudden philosophical argument: What do we truly know? Many people throughout history began to question whether science was really providing them with the true knowledge of reality.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    As time passes, knowledge becomes more complex and philosophers start to develop different theories regarding how people come about this knowledge. There is a distinct difference between both Rationalism and Empiricism and both Descartes and Locke have found ways to discredit and support both views. Descartes argument towards Rationalism is much stronger than Hume's argument towards Empiricism. There is quite the distinction between both empiricism and rationalism. The major difference between rationalism and empiricism concerns their knowledge basis.…

    • 1317 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays