Hume argues that miracles are based purely on experience and that we essentially can’t trust anyone’s judgement because of that. He claims that people are untrustworthy, and because it is impossible to tell whether or not they are making something up or not, we should just assume that they are and we therefore cannot take their word for their experience into consideration when it comes to miracles. A flaw in this argument, however, is that we would have to apply this philosophy to the ideas of the laws of nature. Hume argues that any evidence of a violation of a law of nature is completely destroyed on the premise that there is too much evidence for normal laws of nature. However, this evidence comes purely from experience of people as well,
