Hume argues that we can never know of the powers within a cause and how it produces its effect. He demonstrates this fact by showing that even a priori reasons are not sufficient to understanding the necessary connection. Additionally, even experience, which is the basis of Hume’s metaphysics, cannot inform individuals how one billiard ball can move another ball. This is so because humans are confined to the constant conjunction of events. That is to say, the mind begins to anticipate an effect when watching a cause numerous times produce the same results. Thus, this anticipation is a hindrance to grasping the actuality of causation because the mind tries to solve the puzzle of understanding necessary connections by inserting its ideas that were developed from
Hume argues that we can never know of the powers within a cause and how it produces its effect. He demonstrates this fact by showing that even a priori reasons are not sufficient to understanding the necessary connection. Additionally, even experience, which is the basis of Hume’s metaphysics, cannot inform individuals how one billiard ball can move another ball. This is so because humans are confined to the constant conjunction of events. That is to say, the mind begins to anticipate an effect when watching a cause numerous times produce the same results. Thus, this anticipation is a hindrance to grasping the actuality of causation because the mind tries to solve the puzzle of understanding necessary connections by inserting its ideas that were developed from