David Hume: Being Morally Right

Improved Essays
Being perceived as being morally right is reliant on a person’s feelings towards a topic, rather than their reasoning. David Hume, an empiricist, opposed the idea that having practical reasoning and being able to apply it was a form of being morally right. Moral actions are based off the faith of that person. According to Albom, “ Faith is about doing. You are how you act, not just how you believe.” Being practical follows a rationalistic view, and you are then neglecting the numerous possibilities that exist which could also be morally right. Additionally, the notion that someone must do something due to the fact that it is considered “correct” rather than being emotionally invested in that idea, was something Hume did not agree with. The

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    David Hume Judges

    • 1423 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Argument (Page 227 in the course reader) There is only one opinion of any given subject that is true and that is the joint verdict of true judges. A true judge doesn’t discriminate, has adequate practice with similar works, has an adequate ability to compare these works, has sufficient reasoning when it comes to the assessment of works and is free from any prejudices. Judges that have satisfied this criteria will all reach the same verdict.…

    • 1423 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When we apply the theory of argumentum absurdum to both Hume and Aristotle’s argument, the equation would yield the same results. Since humans are capable of infallibility, and humans write about miracles, then miracles cannot be proven to exist, therefore, God cannot exist if his existence is reliant upon the miracles. Therefore, the existence of God cannot be logically proven under Hume’s claim, since we cannot see God, we cannot prove miracles exist, and God cannot exist where man is corrupt. To be fair, the converse is offered for evaluation.…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Is the story, “A Horseman in the Sky”, of a young man’s decision to join the union military, which eventually lead him to a precarious circumstance; which he found himself confronted with an ethical and moral battle. A young Virginian man confronted his father with the news that he would be joining a military regiment in the state of Grafton, with this news the father, reluctantly, accepted the boys decision. The father, calling his son a traitor to the state of Virginia, added, “Should we both live to the end of the war, we will speak further into the matter” (pp. 98). The son departed soon after, and due to the broad knowledge of the landscape of Virginia soon found himself highly praised in his new military role fighting against the very state in which he resided. While resting following an extensive journey, the sentinel was awoken with an unsettling certainty; in an interesting twist of fate the…

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Individuals hold distinct values and often conclude their interpretation of the world is true and right. It is this complex fusion of values and beliefs that lead to ethical dilemmas. Newman and Pollnitz (2005, page 108) describe ethics as what we perceive to be the right course of action, what we…

    • 1986 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The interesting aspect of morality is how universally unbiased it is supposed to be, but yet, is still met with a debate towards what is morally correct and morally wrong. While morality is supposed to be objective, there is a subjectivity to whom those morals apply to and to whom they benefit or harm. In Chelsea Schein and Kurt Gray’s "The Theory of Dyadic Morality: Reinventing Moral Judgment by Redefining Harm,” they discussed the evolution of morality and how difficult it is to establish a clear answer on what morality is. Schein and Gray wrote, “[one] definition of moral judgment is ‘evaluations (good vs. bad) of the actions or character of a person that are made with respect to a set of virtues held to be obligatory by a culture or subculture’ (Haidt, 2001, p. 817)” (Schein and Gray 35).…

    • 1502 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Now, let’s look at the late modern thinkers who have a slightly different approach to our moral judgments and how we should perceive them. Immanuel Kant, unlike Aristotle and Aquinas, saw duty as the foundation of reason. Kant believed that one shouldn’t only act in accordance with duty but to act for duty’s sake. Additionally, Kant says that doing the right thing is doing the thing that most people would agree with and that conformed rule will determine right or wrong. By the same token, Kant brings up the categorical imperative in which says that everyone must act in a manner that could reciprocate on a universal level.…

    • 459 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant's Moral Explanations

    • 2003 Words
    • 9 Pages

    a person’s standards of behavior or beliefs concerning what is and is not acceptable for them to do. This essay intends point out the relevant aspects of moral theologians, Kant, Mill, Aristotle and Held and to answer the question of the best suited approach in resolving ethical problems and dilemmas. Kant I have found that Kant’s theory is the most complicated and confusing of the four. It was only made somewhat clear by the explanation in O’Neill’s reading.…

    • 2003 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    For centuries, philosophers have applied sets of normative principles in effort to distinguish if an action is morally right or wrong. The purpose of normative ethics is to help guide society on how humans ought to act. These theories provide justifiable and reliable outcomes to determine if an action is moral or immoral. Two principles that play a significant role in normative ethics are consequentialism and Kantianism. When faced with a moral dilemma, these theories may agree or conflict with one another.…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the branch of normative ethics, a person discerns what is right or wrong behavior. There are several theories about what is right or wrong conduct, but two of the most popular ideas is Utilitarianism and Kantianism. Both set up strict methods of deciding how a person would know what the right thing to do in a situation would be. On one hand, utilitarianism claims that you can use intuition to discern what the greatest good for the greatest number of people is. On the other side, Kantianism claims that you can use reasoning and logic to discern moral obligations and rules.…

    • 957 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are considered founders of Utilitarianism. Utilitarianism is an ethical theory where moral rightness is measured by what brings the most happiness to the most people. Utilitarianism is a form of consequentialism because it is based on whether an action is morally justified by its consequences. Bentham and Mill differ in that Bentham reasoned that pleasure was measurable using hedons, units of pleasure, where actions with the highest score were the best action.…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Summum bonum is the highest form of good according to the values and priorities in an ethical system. For John Stuart Mill, the summum bonum is happiness. Mill is lead to this belief by regarding happiness as the ultimate aim of humanity – to live a life as free from pain and as rich in enjoyment as possible. This is the ideology of utilitarianism, or Mill’s moral theory that judges the ethicality of an action following its utility. Mill’s argument of chapter 2 of Utilitarianism is defining the greatest happiness principle and addressing misconceptions and criticisms opponents have.…

    • 1076 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    We live in a society that have different moral differences. It is hard for people to actually understand the concept of right and wrong. Because, not everyone shares the same idea of what constitutes decent behavior. Rosenstand has four major paths to choose from. There is nihilism, ethical relativism, soft universalism, and hard universalism.…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    How do we tell what is wrong from right? Ever since we were little, it has been instilled in us that actions such as stealing money is wrong and actions like providing aid to the elderly is right. Our sense of wrong and rightfulness is referred to morals, but there are many different branches tied to the common ground of morals. One of the branches of morals is moral realism which states that there are “objective moral facts (Atheism And The City).” These are the morals that have been engraved into our conscience so it seems like it is common sense that wrongful actions are indeed wrongful and vice versa for rightful actions.…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Morality: An essential to life      A Russian born American science-fiction writer and biochemist once quoted, “Never let your sense of morals get in the way of doing what’s right.” This statement generates a…

    • 898 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Personal Harm Is Wrong

    • 1078 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Morality is one of the most complex questions facing mankind. Deciding what is and isn’t moral, what morality entails, and how we should live out our lives has plagued us for centuries and doesn’t seem to be close to being universally solved any time soon. However, most people seek to answer this question for themselves in some way shape or form, whether it be based on actual moral theories or just on what sounds right to them. Drawing from multiple philosophers, in my own opinion, an act is right if it promotes happiness and wrong if it causes others harm.…

    • 1078 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays