Empiricism In Empeiria

Improved Essays
Empiricism. Depriving of the Greek word, Empeiria, meaning experience. Like many English words honored with deprivation from the language of our ancestors, the greek it was harvested from hints at its meaning. Empiricism is a philosophical theory, the theory of experience. It is the view that all knowledge comes from experience, furthermore sensory experience. The premise being that sensory experience is the most reliable source of knowledge. We can’t imagine the world without the sensory information our body has provided us. If you take a book, for example, try imagining it without color. Now imagine it without texture, feel, decoration, and smell. You can’t imagine it. You may have chosen to make it black or white, but black and white are …show more content…
The main difference between belief and fiction is much simpler than our complex minds wish it to be. The difference is feeling. There’s a feeling in our mind when belief is present that differs from the presence of fiction. Take a minute and explore your surroundings with your senses. What do you see, feel, smell, and taste? Now imagine you're a character in your favorite book. What do you see, feel, smell, and taste? Now compare the two experiences. Which one was more livid? Which one were your senses more controlled? Which one did you feel most present in? If you are like most people, it would be your current surrounding, not the imagined surroundings. This is because of a feeling, and you can’t necessarily describe the feeling but it's there. They felt different and that's the difference. Belief has a more lively, vivid, present feeling that fiction just doesn’t present. This may be hard to comprehend, in fact, Hume put a warning in this section for more calculated minds. Because this is a hard thing to consider. As humans, we strive for knowledge but are confused when the knowledge gives us questions instead of answers. In fact, that's one of the strengths, weakness of Hume's philosophy. He saw that though we want to be logical, feeling control most of our actions, thoughts, and prayers. The feeling is a big part of Hume’s philosophy. Though sometimes it is …show more content…
Now like our senses combining to give us experience, we must now combine this topic with an idea. Because, like all good philosophy, everything ties together one way or another. In this particular way, all the theories we have discussed are philosophies of Hume. Now, how do the remaining tie together? This is actually quite simple. Empiricism is knowledge based on sensory experience. Without empiricism, we could not have either belief or fiction. Fiction is primarily based on the knowledge of our sensory experiences. Without empiricism, there is nothing to pull the ideas from. A cook can not cook without any food, and fiction and empiricism are the same. Though different, they correlate. Food can still exist without a cook, but without food, a cook is no longer a cook. Therefore empiricism can exist without fiction, but without empiricism, fiction is no longer fiction. Belief, however, is a little more tricky. Without belief, empiricism has no knowledge to obtain. Therefore without knowledge, the theory is irrelevant. Belief, though, is the presence of senses but you know not what these senses are without former knowledge of something you can correlate them with. WIthout empiricism, belief is not belief, but more the ugly twin sister of belief. It may have the same qualities, but it’s not the

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Epiphenomenalism Analysis

    • 1592 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Critical Analysis ‘Epihenomenalism and Eliminativism’ Trenton Merricks In this paper, I will be presenting a critical analysis of Trenton Merricks’s ‘Epiphenomenalism and Eliminativism’ (2001). Merricks delivers a strong argument for the elimination of non-living macro-physical objects, and the denial of causal powers that these types of objects may be said to have: he labels this argument the ‘overdetermination argument’, which he illustrates with an example of a baseball shattering a window. I wish to object to the elimination of non-living macro-physical objects by accounting for the plausibility of macro-causation. I intend to provide objections and responses to premises 1-3 of Merricks’s argument.…

    • 1592 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    He explains that even the small part of the universe we’re aware of is so diverse with many different springs, principles, and systems. Hume's point reveals that the comparison itself is a hasty generalization because we don't know enough about the universe as a whole to compare it to a machine. Also, alternative analogies and explanations exist that could be more probable. Hume explains it’s possible that the material world of matter falls into order or arranges itself on its own like the mental world of ideas.…

    • 1287 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The concept of believing someone words or having solid information towards a subject has people misinterpreting what is fact or fiction. In the article Things People Say, Niel Degrasses Tyson crafts an argument that heavily relies on analogies and explains them to get the point across. Tyson begins his essay by questioning why people believed Aristotle’s theories and the negligence of religion to facts. The rest of the author’s article compares various heavily misinterpreted concepts like “what goes up, must come down” and “the sun is yellow” for example and corrects the reader why others believe this as factual information. Tyson concludes his argument by stating, “”.…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The way something makes a person feel will always be remembered. Whether the actions or events are reality or fiction, what it makes you think will always be real and unique. In works of literature like “Things They Carried” and “Fences” some things tend to be a stretch of the truth. Being able to add some fiction and change reality can give you a different perspective of the story and help you fill a gap you could not fill before with what actually happened. In “Fences” it was used to make Troy’s emotions more vivid to the audience.…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In this paper, I will define and describe the mind body problem, defend the position of property dualism, support my claim through the problem of personal identity and the problem of interaction, and provide one refute using epiphenomenalism. The mind-body problem the question of how our consciousness is created through the interaction of mental and brain states. The best way to describe the interaction between mental and brain states is through property dualism. A supporting argument for property dualism is through the problem of personal identity. Through the problem of interacting, property dualism is further strengthened as an accurate way to describe the mind-body problem.…

    • 1060 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Fiction Vs Nonfiction

    • 1271 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Through the methods in which a writer creates a fictional story by using devices such as, Character, plot, and point of view they are able to expand and enhance our ability to understand other human beings; it promotes a deep sense of morality that affects all readers. Subsequently, fiction’s happy endings have distorted the reader’s sense of reality for the betterment of society. As a matter of fact, fiction is more effective at challenging our beliefs than nonfiction, which is made to persuade through argument and evidence. As readers we tend to be reticent, analytical and suspicious of what we read when it comes to nonfiction. But when it comes to a work of fiction, we are quick to indulge our minds into the made up universe, making it effortless…

    • 1271 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thus I lean more towards believing in Clifford’s rationalization that we should never fully believe something until we have sufficient evidence. The idea of Epistemology…

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hume’s Argument for the Belief in Uniformity of Nature Hume begins section seven of An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding by expanding on his definitions he introduced in previous sections. In this section, on the idea of necessary connection,…

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    David Hume was one of the most influential philosophers of his time and continues to be mentioned and studies to this day. Almost equally as impressive was the response that philosopher Immanuel Kant had to his Inquiry of Human Understanding. Kant attempted to respond to Hume’s ideas and in this essay, I will identify the Hume’s beliefs behind the concepts such as cause, and effect and I will later defend Kant’s response to Hume. He raises points that leave his reader with a deeper understanding of his concept and explicitly outlines his beliefs on the concepts that Hume covers in his Human Inquiry.…

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Before bringing Hume into the picture, it is important to first examine how scientific findings like Zaki et al. ’s rely on faith: Zaki et al. must believe the findings from previous papers regarding the functions of the neural regions, namely orbitofrontal cortex and nucleus accumbens, to assess their data and to come up with their explanation. Upon closer evaluation, it becomes evident that Zaki et al.’s conclusions rely on testimonies reported by others, which is coincidentally a topic vividly explored by Hume.…

    • 1500 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Reading/Discussion Questions Assignment 1 1. Students improve in the way they think. They would be a better person, be happy, and find the correct truth about what happen in life. That is what Philosophy do to us, it guides you to develop your brain better. Also the word Philosophy is more often recognized as “the love of wisdom.”…

    • 847 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Two of the most intriguing schools of philosophy are the two which deal specifically with epistemology, or, what is better known as the origin of knowledge. Although they are not completely opposite of one another, they are argued in depth by two of the most famous philosophers in history. The origins of study in rationalism and empiricism can be found in the 17th century, during a time when various significant developments were made in the fields of astronomy and mechanics. These advancements undoubtedly led to the questions that probed the sudden philosophical argument: What do we truly know? Many people throughout history began to question whether science was really providing them with the true knowledge of reality.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Taylor Swift is the best singer of all time. That is the truth. Now, wait a minute. Am I serious? Yes, I am.…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    rationalism is the belief in innate ideas, reasoning, and deduction, while empiricism is the belief that there is sense perception, inductions, and no innate ideas. To make more clear the rationalist theory says that knowledge is gained through pure thinking and reasoning and that knowledge is gained prior to experience. This a priori knowledge is reached through deduction, which means conclusions are then based on if premises in an argument hold true making the arguments valid. Empiricism on the other hand, claims that our knowledge that we gain comes from experience.…

    • 1317 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Plato's View Of Relativism

    • 1680 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Traditional Understanding Although a key issue in contemporary times, relativism dates back to the beginnings of Western philosophy. As Baghramian (2015) notes, the earliest documented source on relativism can be traced back to Plato’s account of the Sophist Philosopher Protagoras of Abdera (490-420BC) who, during a period of increased contact between people of different cultures in ancient Athens, claimed that “Man is the measure of all things; of the things that are, that they are; and of the things that are not, that they are not” (p. 233). While it is unclear whether Protagoras’s comment was necessarily relativist in the way that relativism is used to attack his ideas today (Marc & Curd, 2000), Plato interpreted Protagoras as meaning…

    • 1680 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays