Getting rid of slavery also meant that they were losing money because they paid for them and were going to have to free them. Though Lincoln did The magazine Mississippi called the Civil War “The War of Northern Aggression.” (9) The conclusion I drew from the magazine’s position is they were showing how the South was the victim of this whole…
The South's attempts for expansion, justified by the economic need for more land and therefore increased utilization of the growing slave population, appears to have a deeper motivation, the need for the vindication of Southern life. David Herbert Donald, in “Why the War Came: The Sectional Struggle over Slavery in the Territories,” provides a counter view to the South's claims it needed expansion to monetarily survive stating, “there was no special reason why –- apart from the generally expansive temper of all Americans --- for the economic reasons it had to be extended into additional territory.” Why then did the South push so hard to “expand or die”? The South strikes back with calls for expansion due to the belief “they were daily threatened…
The South vs. The South William Freehling, The South vs. The South. (New York, NY: Oxford University, 2001) William W. Freehling is an American historian, and Professor of History and Otis A. Singletary Chair in Humanities at the University of Kentucky, and is the author of The Road to Disunion, Volume I: Disunionists at Bay, 1776 – 1854, which won the Owsley Prize. William Freehling's The South vs. The South book is two hundred and thirty-eight pages and divided into ten chapters.…
“They Started many tobacco plantation and brought in black slaves from Africa to provide most of the labor.” It also states “The North developed an intricate railroad system and shipping industry to transport the manufactured goods” (Doc 3).The North and South are different from living,views and needs this leads to sectionalism. The south only depended on slaves to do the labor working growing tobacco and working in the cotton fields but the North depended on factories. North and South have different economical and social differences. The North only depend on agriculture because it give the more of a population but, the South depend on agriculture to get more slaves.…
Patrick Bauer 11/9/15 HIST-105-519 Harriet Jacobs Essay In the book Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl by Harriet Jacobs, Jacobs’ tells of the many trails and hard experiences that the average slave goes through from day to day. From malicious punishments to extreme acts of hatred we see the treatment that African-Americans were subject to as they spent their lives in servitude to the slaveholders. These actions of the southern slaveholders are personified in this book by the first person account of Jacobs’ as the slave-girl Linda who she uses to help us better understand and imagine the hardships that she and other slaves had to fight through.…
Controversy was spread all over the United States due to slavery. In general the South was in favor of slavery, whereas the North was opposed to it. The North’s main argument in this controversy was “Free Soil” and that slavery hurt white men and the economy. The South, however, claimed that without slavery, it would not be able to have a stable society or economy. The North believed slavery hurt white men and must be stopped from expanding throughout the United states; the South argued that both the United States government and the British economy needed slavery in order to survive.…
The north was not racist and didn’t need slaves. Slave labor had become less useful, replaced in the cities and factories by immigrant labor from Europe and thought the slaves work wasn’t needed for their work. The north was against slavery. Also there was no point of slaves and said there should be no more slavery and they should have their own rights. In document (2) American anti-slavery society states that slavery was the most horrible system of bondage that ever existed in any country.…
From reading For Cause and Comrades, I learned about several motivations and reasons that soldiers from the North and the South fought in the Civil War. Overall, the soldiers and their respective sides fought for very similar reasons and motives. Both sides were fighting for their views on slavery, how the states should govern laws, and how the economy should operate. I plan to analyze and compare the motives for the North and the South and show how each side was fighting for remarkably similar reasons. Through the reasons and motives listed above, we will be able to see the similarities but, also we will be able to see how each side was different as well.…
After the Revolution, Northern and Southern states found themselves diverging on several political, economic, and social topics, including slavery. However, the two regions still found some common ground in spite of their differing views. Despite abolishing slavery in the North, Northern whites didn’t take the necessary measures to abolish slavery in the South and create equality between whites and blacks until they found it beneficial for themselves. Even with the growing divide between the North and South, both sides’ actions ultimately upheld white hegemony throughout the country.…
The south constantly pushed for an increase in slaves and arable land to expand a plantation based economy; however the North constantly pushed back against the South 's need for slaves and land. The North knew an increase in land and slaves will disproportionately distribute power in favor of the South. The North constantly tried to slow down the expansion of slavery and the Southern economy through the Slave trade compromise, the Tariff of Abominations, Missouri compromise, and popular sovereignty. Slavery, a major factor in the tension leading to the civil war was not the primary cause. The dominant factor entrenched itself in the state’s aggressive battle for regional dominance, and economic…
The topic I chose to analyze from the book Taking Sides is rather the Civil War fought over slavery. This issue occurred in the 18th century and impacted black slaves and whites across the United States. Prior to the Civil War in the southern states (which declared themselves as the Confederate states when they separated from the United States) there were lands that included laborious work and the slaves would do the labor from sunup to sundown. The Confederate states desired to have more slave states and they declared secession from the United States. The Union noticed the Confederate states as a threat and a group of rebels who wanted more power but, the Union wanted balance and would continue to have power.…
I, as you stated believe that the southerners did think the northerners were greedy and materialist; however, it was actually the southerners who were the greedy ones on many ways. The southerners were jealous of the vast economy in the north yet could not see past their own jealousy to realize this was their own fault for not moving with the times. The south wanted their land, more land, their slaves to work it, and money to boot; basically, they wanted their cake and eat it too. I do believe most of the wealth and education came in the north as well due to the economical means to educate; thus, adding more economical growth. The freedom to choose one’s own livelihood spoke volumes in the northern states, making for happier workers, which…
In the 1800’s, the United States was divided and vulnerable, as a result of opposing beliefs and philosophies in the north and the south, particularly surrounding slavery. The nation was divided into Yankees, who occupied the northern states and opposed slavery, and Confederates, consisting of those in the southern states who exploited the slave trade. The American Civil War was a detrimental consequence of this conflict and opposition of views, which had both short term and enduring effects on American society and lifestyle. Prior to the Civil War in 1861, American was a nation divided by philosophies; the north and the south. The South strongly believed in States’ Rights, where power is held by individual states.…
Question 1: How did slavery affect politics between 1800 and 1860? This time era is the pre-civil war era in America. The tensions were quite high between these years only growing tighter. The North was doing all it could to stop the South and its expansion of slavery into the new western territories. The main political goal of the North was in fact to stop the expansion of slavery not abolish it from the South.…
The expanse of war in the South was much larger than in the North. Leaving many plantation destroyed and the cotton market that would not recover. The Civil War was viewed by the South as the “Lost Cause” (textbook, 452) justifying the defeat by moving on hoping for a better future. In turn, the white southern seen the African Americans as “adversaries” (textbook, 453) seeing them as challenging the superiority of white southerner. With so much destruction of property and the defeat to the psych of the southern people.…