No, think there should be a mandate for in researchers to share all their raw data online. In the article, the authors stated other fields of research have had a similar mandate in place for several years. Additionally, it would save a great amount of time and research funds if researchers were able to simply acquire the data when building on a study rather than having to replicate the original study in the first place. This redundancy is waste of time and money and is a unnecessary step when researching a topic. However, I do think there should be some kind of exemption from this mandate if the original researcher already has plans to build on their data. If a researcher already has plans to build on to a future study with the data they acquired previously, they should be protected from having other researchers use their data and beat them to publishing the future study. This could be acquired by having the researchers show proof of a grant application in order to be exempted from sharing their raw data. Otherwise, I think the data should be shared publicly in order to benefit the progression of the scientific community …show more content…
Also, it could be problematic in the event of research misconduct and incorrect data collection. If individuals are using this raw data freely and it ends up being false data, that could be very troubling to future research using that raw data. The strongest argument for the mandate would be it would increase the sharing of data. This would result in making the research process less redundant and help the overall progression of scientific research by saving grant money and research time collecting data that has already been