Darwin’s Theory of Evolution should not be taught as fact because it is as much a theory as any other theory. Teaching this theory as a fact creates a bias for young students. Forcing a personal opinion on them at such a young age hinders a student’s learning opportunity, as well as their learning ability. This takes away the chance for one to examine all the evidence and make their own decision based on fact. Darwin’s theory has many gaps in logic and should not be accepted as foolproof.
Those who teach Darwin’s theory often ignore the flaws he, himself, discussed in his book, On the Origin of Species. Peoples prejudice often cloud their judgement. Scientists will disregard flaws in Darwin’s theory when presenting their ideas. Due to this …show more content…
In this relationship, the blind shrimp digs a hole for both itself and the goby to live in, but since the shrimp is blind, it does not know when it is in danger while it is digging. That’s where the goby comes in. While the shrimp is maintaining the hole, the goby keeps watch, ready to signal if a predator appears. This relationship defies evolution because it would be impossible for these two creatures to survive without each other long enough to evolve at exactly the same time and protect each other.
An unbiased examination of evolution provides little to no strong evidence, but strong evidence against it. If evolution were correct, evidence would be displayed all over the fossil record. However, there is no evidence preserved in the fossil record anywhere of transitional forms occurring. Mutations are discussed in Darwin’s theory, but mutations cannot increase DNA like the theory requires. The complex life forms of life could never have occurred by …show more content…
Countless questions exist that evolution scientists simply just don’t have answers for. There are so many intricate details in every single living thing. The giraffe is an example of Gods handiwork. Snowflakes are another strange thing only the Bible can fully explain. The complexity of even the smallest living cell could never have evolved by chance.
The controversy between evolution and creationism should be taught in public schools. Knowing the controversy allows students to keep an open mind about their beliefs and
Those who teach Darwin’s theory often ignore the flaws he, himself, discussed in his book, On the Origin of Species. Peoples prejudice often cloud their judgement. Scientists will disregard flaws in Darwin’s theory when presenting their ideas. Due to this …show more content…
In this relationship, the blind shrimp digs a hole for both itself and the goby to live in, but since the shrimp is blind, it does not know when it is in danger while it is digging. That’s where the goby comes in. While the shrimp is maintaining the hole, the goby keeps watch, ready to signal if a predator appears. This relationship defies evolution because it would be impossible for these two creatures to survive without each other long enough to evolve at exactly the same time and protect each other.
An unbiased examination of evolution provides little to no strong evidence, but strong evidence against it. If evolution were correct, evidence would be displayed all over the fossil record. However, there is no evidence preserved in the fossil record anywhere of transitional forms occurring. Mutations are discussed in Darwin’s theory, but mutations cannot increase DNA like the theory requires. The complex life forms of life could never have occurred by …show more content…
Countless questions exist that evolution scientists simply just don’t have answers for. There are so many intricate details in every single living thing. The giraffe is an example of Gods handiwork. Snowflakes are another strange thing only the Bible can fully explain. The complexity of even the smallest living cell could never have evolved by chance.
The controversy between evolution and creationism should be taught in public schools. Knowing the controversy allows students to keep an open mind about their beliefs and