As indicated by Barros, regularly
As indicated by Barros, regularly
Moral on Capital Punishment Working at a prison is a dangerous job; you are surrounded by evil minded crooks and murderers every day. Even though security is said to be on top and the rules are set, these people, these immoral souls have no limits and a rule or a law for them is seen as a challenge to break. Donna Payant, a 31-year-old correction officer had to learn this the hard way. The year was 1981 and she had just arrived for what was supposed to be a regular day at work, however, it turned out to be her last. Donna Payant, the mother of three children and with a loving husband, was murdered at work by inmate Lemuel Smith, a rapist and two-time convicted murderer.…
An ACCT is closed when a prisoner is not deemed at risk anymore (Prison Reform Trust, 2012).In 1985 the Samaritans were asked to work with the home office in order to join a suicide prevention group they wanted to set up, now they are a vital part of the prisons suicide and self-harm prevention strategy, with their listener…
Therefore, Baz felt a sense of urgency to embark on a mission to make a difference in prisons worldwide by using her profession as an educator to help many human beings. She is in search of alternatives to the American system’s reliance on harsh sentencing, mandatory minimums, and the threat of solitary confinement.…
WP3 Body 3 Claim: To a certain extent, the 13th amendment is helpful because corporations promise legislators kickbacks and other benefits. Evidence: To ensure that revenues are high, shareholders are content, and the immoral prison industry remains entirely legal, corporations have created a lobby group, that prefers not to call themselves a lobby group (cite), called the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC).…
One could question whether these arguments are sufficient enough to justify this concept, then again, that is solely individualistic. In contrast, the arguments against this concept are many. Schwartz and Nurge, (2004) argues that the benefits of private prisons are hardly noticed, there are many unexpected long term costs due to factors such as recidivism, compliance of monitoring, legal factors and enforcement measures. According to Anderson (2009) employees at private prisons are very likely to have stocks invested in the company, which consequently, generates profit, which may affect their level of professionalism, which may be a disadvantage for the prisoners, by receiving additional to their sentence, due biased professionalism of correctional…
Private prison employees often have stock in their company or receive some type of profit-incentive, and as a result, this profit motive can directly influence their professional decisions (i.e. longer sentences and no goodtime) (Anderson, 2009). Since staffing accounts for 70% of the prison budge, private prisons often cut costs in labor (Blakely & Bumphus, 2004). Private prisons employee 15% fewer guards per prison than public prisoners (Anderson, 2009). As a result, violence among inmates and assaults on correctional officers is more frequent in private prisons.…
Prisons around the U.S. have recently increased security, as it may possibly replace solitary confinement, this is a preposterous idea since there are far more prisoners than there are guards. To start with, increasing security would be ineffective due to the fact that prisoners will effortlessly overthrow security guards. In fact, “Inmates reportedly overpowered an officer and took control of one side of the dorm, holding the officer for nearly an hour and a half.” (wach.com) Furthermore, increasing security guards in prisons as an alternative to solitary is vain. To sum up, expanding security in prisons is utterly pointless.…
Interestingly enough, the author also offers a counter argument for the theory of “New Slavery,” by discussing how the socially accepted goal of prisons has been to incapacitate prisoners and therefore, only a small amount of them actually work while they are incarcerated. In addition, the author contends that the principal reason private interests fail to exploit prisoner labor is because they cannot out compete big firms at setting up satellite work…
Crime Control As Industry: Towards Gulags, Western Style by Nils Christie, a professor of Criminology at the University of Oslo, is somehow a ground-breaking book to the extent that it argues that ‘’crime control, rather than crime itself is the existent danger for our future’’ and that systems of crime control have the potential for developing western style Gulags, or concentration camps (p.15) Crime Control as Industry is divided into 13 chapters each of those filled with very concrete and heavily revised amounts of data which try to explains us the readers how managing crime has turned into a reasonably big industry; “the crime control industry” and how it will continue to grow because unlike most industries there is “no lack of raw-material” as crime is in endless supply. But it goes further into my interpretation as Nils Christie also suggests that the increased prison populations, especially in the United States characterise a move ‘’towards Gulag’s western style’’. Christie argues that the fundamental problems of this threat are the unequal distribution of wealth and the lack of access to paid work. In this third edition the author does a quite memorable job as he documents the enormous growth in the number of prisoners in recent years by giving us a global perspective to incarceration and by comparing how unequal imprisonment rates between likely European countries are.…
The Goal of Private Prisons: A Scheme for Profit The operations of private prison show that their success is dependent upon housing the maximum number of inmates. In order to fill beds at private facilities the private corporations lobby for stronger drug and immigration laws along with longer sentences to accompany these laws. These new laws result in the United States having five percent of the world population but housing twenty-five percent of the world’s prisoners. (Liptak, 2008)…
Personally, I believe that it is the state’s responsibility to maintain a safe environment for all of the people living in it; thus, I believe that punishment is the responsibility of the state, and should not be contracted out. In fact, it is stated in the book, that through instrumental justification, the state is the most appropriate agent to inflict criminal sanctions because of its fair and impartial position” (p. 294). Private prisons, according to the text, “are a contradiction of sorts for the criminal justice system” (p. 129). Private prisons are “operated and maintained by a privately owned correctional firm;” thus, are scrutinized for many reasons. Partial scrutinizing transpires because the punishments are weak and partially because…
The Downfall of Private Prisons The privatization of jails and prisons in the United States are becoming more and more popular with 122 adult prisons and 252 juvenile facilities, capable of holding more than 160,000 inmates for the past 8 years. These facilities have pros and cons however, 32 states contract with private sector prisons and almost 17 percent of adult inmates are held in private prisons. (Allen, Latessa, and Ponder)…
The Problem with For-Profit Prison Private or for profit prisons are facilities that are contracted with the local, state or federal government to operate correctional facilities. In the 1980’s President Reagan said that government was the problem and proposed privatizing many institutions (Selman & Leighton, 2010). According to the American Civil Liberties Union, currently about 6% of state prisoners and 16% of federal inmates are in a privatized institutions. The most common argument in favor of for-profit prisons is that private industry is far more efficient than government and thus can operate facilities more more cheaply than the government.…
These are the types of people that pass or fail the prison system test. Prisoners soon learn that their mental and physical survival depends on emotional control, resistance to or violence and aggression, and an ability to negotiate with other…
The Black Guerilla Family became more structured as it grew from inside the prison, using their reputation to their advantage and developed a defined hierarchy. The high ranking leaders of the Black Guerilla Family extended its power and control outside the prison walls as it pulled in members from other gangs. The BGF began to recruit people on the outside to “serve as BGF couriers” and in fact had so much power that if those recruited chose to opt out or decline, they would have to “pay a monthly fee” (Ferranti, 2014). This was clearly an organized group who used crime to their advantage with complete disregard to the humans around them and a clear lack of respect for authority. With time on their side, the Black Guerilla Family members structured…