Extrinsic Motivation In Criminal Justice

Improved Essays
Criminal justice is essentially the system of activities and government institutions that are meant to uphold social control by mitigating and deterring crime. Additionally, these events are directed at sanctioning criminals through rehabilitation and penalties. With the ever-increasing criminal activities in the world, a sustainable solution is needed to address this issue. As such this paper illuminates the manner in which Dan Pink’s motivation principles could be applied to criminal justice.
Pink (2009) presents two types of motivation principles: extrinsic and intrinsic motivation principles. The extrinsic motivation principles are essentially driven by such external factors as punishments and rewards. On the other hand, intrinsic motivation
…show more content…
In this regard, this type of motivation principle has been based on what Dan Pink calls algorithmic approach. In this approach, people are given a set of rules to follow. In this regard, citizens are expected to follow well laid out rules and regulation, failure to which they risk being punished accordingly. In other words, citizens are forced, as it is, to strictly follow some rules in which case they are demotivated from committing crimes. This would mean that the application of this principles involves creating a kind of fear to people to prevent criminal activities in society. While this principle may be effective as it is, it also has been faulted by many. This is because creating fear among people would not be a sustainable way of mitigating criminal activities in the world. This is because it is only effective on a short-term basis. In this regard, people will not commit the crime not because it is wrong, but because they fear the consequences; they fear being arrested and displayed in a court of law. In other words, the moment they get a chance to commit the crime and avoid an arrest, they feel justified. This is because what deters them is an external force which is a penalty in this case. This reality has been the cause of major crimes across the globe. Many criminals walk scot-free having committed even such serious crimes as murder, simply because they can cheat the …show more content…
The excessive autonomy proposed by the principle will be counterproductive to the rule of law. People could not be allowed to live the way they want; the world will be in chaos. This is because of the ever-eroding moral fabric. The two principles could be applied by striking a balance on their enforcement. In this regard, there should not be too much force from the government on the people and neither should they be given too much freedom. In as much some people will be principled, the law will restrict the rather unscrupulous ones. As such, the two principles are applicable in criminal justice but to some extent for each one of

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    People don’t do injustice because they have fear of law or they don’t want listed their name in the criminal records, otherwise if the government give free rights to do what ever they want to do, they are just afraid of consequences of getting caught or acting unjustly . So law and order also having important role to maintain justice among the…

    • 1406 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Argument Against Gun Ban

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages

    These bans are ineffective and hurt Americans more than they help them, which is the opposite of the purpose of these bans. They prevent citizens from having a useful tool in their home or on their person and puts them at a great risk for being fatally wounded by a criminal. Those who own a gun are personally responsible for their actions that involve it and should be held to a certain standard, there is no perfect answer to the dilemma to the person holding the gun but it is certain that banning guns is not the…

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    People who are pro-capital punishment theorize that a person is less likely to commit a crime because they do not want to die at the hands of the government. People saying the opposite, however, believe that no matter what, capital punishment will not deter crime. Their reasoning is something along the lines of “an eye for an eye makes the whole world blind”, meaning that they do not believe that a person should be killed because…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It baffled me how people who are caught committing a crime cannot be arrested simply because they are outside their jurisdiction. Combating crimes need everybody’s commitment and cooperation if actually having a crime free society is part of their objectives. Some of these violators are aware of these laws and take the advantage of it since they know they will get away with…

    • 1076 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Individuals will reject the option to offend because they are fearful of the certainty, swiftness and severity of the penalty. General deterrence focuses on overall society and its basic understanding that punishment is the consequence for committing crime. The individuals themselves may not have offended, but understand there are consequences for illegal…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    New penology ideologies have removed the notion of ever living in a crime less world, which is understandable unrealistic to live in a world without crime. Though it is important to understand and always be trying to reach for a goal and if that goal is just to try to mange crime and of certain populations and areas in hopes of reducing crime, the results are going to what they have been lately with lots of tension between police and citizens. Which should not be the case citizens should not be afraid to go the the police, because if they are they what is point of having police. The ideology of just trying to mange crime instead of trying to remove it needs to be changed in order to see more positive changes in our correctional faculties, and with our…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, society felt reform was in order; the concept to change an individual into a productive citizen was more important than locking them up and throwing away the key. Trying to find the source or reason of their deviant behavior was a crucial step in the deterrence. Leaders felt that social conditions were to blame for the rise in crime. Legislation needed to create and implement policies and practices that addressed the socioeconomic issues many of the prisoners had. Therefore, finding a rational deterrent for crime by investigating its cause became the top priority.…

    • 1452 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are many ways on finding alternatives to incarcerations for nonviolent crimes but I disagree because a person receiving shame punishment won’t help them change their behavior and will negatively affect future decisions. Shame punishment will most likely not help an offender because it will make them feel like they are a bad person. I believe this is true because if a person has to display to the public what they have done, they will feel humiliated and know people will see them as bad even after one…

    • 1518 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Police Shootings

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Their whole thing is to serve and protect the people. To uphold the law which we live by and to prevent more needless crime from happening. Without any law enforcement there is chaos and mayhem. As you said, “where there 's no law, chaos reigns.” There is another thing I also have to disagree with in your article. Again, even though you stated so sarcastically, “treating them (police) as though they are guilty until proven innocent would be wrong,” and yeah it is wrong.…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Ensuring acts receive the punishment which is in their just desert, takes a retributive approach. Through this purpose, criminal law seeks to accomplish crime control and deliverance of justice (Johnstone & Ward 2010, 18-20). Shaping human conduct is an important purpose of the criminal justice system. Without the means rehabilitation, the criminal justice system would stand to serve no meaning. This purpose takes the approach of restorative justification where its’ sole purpose is to reform offenders to co-exist in a community with other law abiding citizens.…

    • 1355 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays