Case Study: Amazon Rainforest

The Amazonians should have control over the whole Amazon Rainforest because the Native’s were there before everyone else and they do more help than harm. The Amazonians should be able to control the land because people in the Amazon that aren’t Amazonian clear the land and making highways. The Amazonians should be able to control the land because the more trees being cut down the Native Amazonians are losing their land and the trees. The Amazonians should be able to control the land because The more land that is being cleared the more wild animals are getting aggressive and hurting random people for the sake of their territory being taken away. Although the loggers are cutting down illegal trees and selling them, …show more content…
Here’s another reason why the the Cattlers shouldn’t be in the forests before the cows start to eat the people light a fire that usually goes off in the the rest of the forest that should be unscaved. The cattle are destroying the forests plus the rivers are being contaminated also. Cattle are eating the grass all the way down to a nub, and the cattle take up 80% of the deforested areas. Basically the forest is being leveled by the cattle. “Illegal loggers send teams into the forest to identify these trees, and then they come in stealthily later and cut them down. The forest is thinned of its biodiversity, picked apart tree by tree. What's worse, the illegal logging gangs take the seed-bearing trees, what the rubber tappers call the "mothers of the forest." The law is that you can’t cut the Seed-Bearing Trees down because the trees provide hundreds of gallons of water a day to transpiration on a hot day. But the Loggers don’t care and they quietly cut the trees down, and this starts the deforestation. The evidence that was provided is alike …show more content…
That is why I believe that the people that were there before hand should keep all of their and go back to the way it used to be, and just live the their l most perfect