He claims to admire the author’s fluent writing while simultaneously stating the book had an inconsistent tone that changed as quickly as a kabuki scenery” (Caos). I for one cannot make sense of his comments, it seems as though he read the book with a closed mind. One minute he is degrading Chen’s memoir piece by piece, then the next he is praising it. He cannot seem to make up his mind on how he feels about the memoir. Cao also believes Chen’s characters have nothing special about them, they lack spunk and originality. He notes the characters laughing but that the readers had no insight of what they were laughing about. However, Cao failed to realize that readers don’t care about what was being laughed at, but that they were just happy the characters found some light through the darkness. The memoir was not meant to be perfect, it was the little imperfections that made it blunt and marvelous at the same
He claims to admire the author’s fluent writing while simultaneously stating the book had an inconsistent tone that changed as quickly as a kabuki scenery” (Caos). I for one cannot make sense of his comments, it seems as though he read the book with a closed mind. One minute he is degrading Chen’s memoir piece by piece, then the next he is praising it. He cannot seem to make up his mind on how he feels about the memoir. Cao also believes Chen’s characters have nothing special about them, they lack spunk and originality. He notes the characters laughing but that the readers had no insight of what they were laughing about. However, Cao failed to realize that readers don’t care about what was being laughed at, but that they were just happy the characters found some light through the darkness. The memoir was not meant to be perfect, it was the little imperfections that made it blunt and marvelous at the same