Cyrenaic Hedonism Research Paper

Improved Essays
Aristippus (c. 430-350 B.C.E) from the town of Cyrene, is considered the creator of Cyrenaic hedonism. First off, hedonism is the philosophic though that pleasure is equal to good and pain is equal to evil. Therefore, Cyrenaic hedonism is the pursuit of intense and immediate pleasure with no qualitative distinctions among pleasures. Aristippus believed pleasure was the main motive for living and that pleasure is always good. This is just simply not true. Yes, we as human beings do seek pleasure probably more times than we think we do, but it is not our “natural goal of all life.” I would say our natural goal of life is happiness. Yes, some pleasures and even most do bring happiness. Though, you have those pleasures that begin to take over and pretty much control your life, or the pleasures that …show more content…
It is ridiculously absurd that someone can even think such a thing. I’m certain those who commit homicide find it to be pleasurable, some even get off on it. So, now is Aristippus saying murder is good because some find it to be one of their pleasures. What about drugs? Is manufacturing, distributing, and using drugs okay because people believe it to be pleasurable. No, that is ludicrous. These things are not good, they’re illegal and not to mention have some very serious consequences. Good pleasures shouldn’t risk yours, let only others, health and safety. How about sex? Yes, sex is a good pleasure, but it can cross the line into bad. It crosses the line when others start forcing others to have sex with them or when people start getting addicted. Honestly, this can happen with any pleasure, for example food. Most find food to be pleasurable, some so much they over consume and become obese. Therefore, not only are not all pleasures good, but even good pleasures have the capability to cross over the threshold into bad. This makes me wonder if Aristippus even thought about pleasures like these or if he did and still believed all pleasures are

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    It does not necessarily involve notions of pleasure, wealth, and honor, since even individuals who acquire the physical goods may not be happy. Humans are rightly guided in life by our natural preference for engaging…

    • 185 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to hedonism, a life is good to the extent that it is filled with happiness (pleasure) and bad to the extent it is filled with unhappiness (pain). It is important to note that hedonists are not referring to physical pleasure as the key to the good life, rather, they are referring to it as enjoyment (attitudinal pleasure). Another way to interpret this is by saying that a good life is having many pleasurable experiences and nothing else. A hedonist might say that if you enjoy doing something, then doing so is pleasurable, so your life is good. Well, according to Robert Nozick, a very famous philosopher, a good life is not just about having a good time, it’s about having a true time.…

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Dalai Lama’s perspective of humanity, purpose of life and idea happiness can be compared to the Cyrenaics’s school of philosophy which was established by Aristippus of Cyrene (435 – 356 BCE). Aristippus was a pupil of Socrates, but had adopted a very different philosophical outlook, teaching that the goal of life was to seek pleasure by adapting circumstances to oneself and by maintaining proper control over both adversity and prosperity. Aristippus’s school of thought propounded that the only good is positive pleasure, and pain is considered only evil. They postulated that all feelings are momentary so all past and future pleasures have no real existence of an individual. Dalai Lama also strongly deduced that enjoying life at the moment…

    • 1158 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A baby does not touch a stove when it is hot because they will get burnt and that is not pleasurable. Infants seek pleasure and not pain. This is the same for adults. Adults seek pleasure in everything they do like an infant however sometimes it is harder for adults to see what is the clearer path to pleasure because adults have more complicated beliefs about what pleasure is. This in turn gets in the way of people achieving happiness because they are unable to find what is pleasurable.…

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The view of happiness as well as the role that pleasures and desires play in achieving happiness can be seen throughout Western philosophy. Detailing a hypothetical dinner conversation between Aristotle, Epicurus, Hobbes, and Epictetus, will such an understanding be described. In such an account, I will be detailing: what issue/s each guest would raise; what thesis would each defend, and how each would respond to the other; as well as who is most likely to disagree with whom and on which points, and who, on the other hand, might find allies or sympathizers. Each philosopher defines/views happiness differently. Aristotle defines happiness as an activity of the soul in accordance to virtue and reason.…

    • 1449 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The highest good just requires that one live happily and by living one should not be anywhere near dying – therefore, all animals including humans should share in the aim for the same ultimate good, as we are all living things. The way we go about achieving this good life is different, but in any case, we are all striving towards living more than dying – therefore more pleasure than pain. Cicero’s argument is that by saying pleasure is the highest good, this would allow for immoral acts being a good should a person find it pleasurable. However, I do not see this as a problem because if committing immoral acts is the persons operationalised definition of pleasure, then committing them does add more to his life. Morality does not really have a part in hedonism unless individuals include that in their operationalised definition of pleasure.…

    • 1257 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    In philosophy there are many stands to take when it comes to a view of topic shared and discovered by many. Specifically, there are three philosophers that have differing ideas on the role of pleasure in morality, Aristotle, Kant, and Mill. They share and clarify their positions through a plethora of titles and information that will help a reader gain a better understanding of the role of pleasure in morality. Though each philosopher has their own share of ideas of what the highest good represents, they all believe in morality being the search for the highest good. Aristotle begins with his description of happiness as fulfillment of all desires, in accordance with compliance of virtue.…

    • 1264 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Introduction: John Stuart Mill, although accepts the Radicals legacy in the utilitarian domain, he adds to and supplements their points of views, especially in the areas of human motivation and the true nature of happiness. When we read through Mill’s approach on happiness, we see how a lot of Radicals’ assumptions are modified, this can be seen in the second chapter of his essay: Utilitarianism. The Proportionality Doctrine is one of the most prominent concepts that emerge from his writing which suggests that actions are “right” when doing them leads to the highest amount of happiness as a lack of pain, and the reverse of this constitutes a “wrong” action. Here, happiness means pleasure which comes with the absence of pain, and unhappiness…

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Influence of Aldous Huxley in Brave New World: Horror of Hedonism Throughout history one great philosophical question that has mankind has struggled with is the question on the purpose of life. A primary answer for this question provided by different philosophers throughout history is the hedonism. The notion that the purpose of life is to be as happy as possible, so, therefore, individuals should live to fulfill their maximum net happiness while avoiding stress and suffering at all cause, because happiness and pleasure are the greatest good and fulfillment, and pain and suffering are the greatest evil. However, the validation of this notion is completely discredited by Aldous Huxley in his utopian world of his novel: Brave New World.…

    • 1056 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    What is the good life? Many philosophers believe that they know what a good life is, what it consists of and how the good life can be reached. Lucretius, a Roman philosopher who followed the idea of Epicureanism, believed that simple pleasures and avoiding pain is happiness which leads to the good life opposed to Epictetus, a Greek philosopher who followed the idea of Stoicism, believed that one should never desire or seek pleasure whatsoever. Although Epicureanism may sound similar to Epictetus, the founder of this system of philosophy was actually Epicurus, who was Lucretius' role model. His philosophy "proposed that the ultimate goal of human life was happiness, and that the greatest good was to seek modest pleasures in order to attain a…

    • 1407 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Autonomy Vs Hedonism

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages

    According to hedonists, a life is good to the extent that it is filled with pleasure and is free of pain. There are two fundamental kinds of pleasure; the physical pleasure, like having sex, eating, or…

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    However, there are higher and lower pleasures, higher pleasures consisting of when one pleasure is desirable over another even if…

    • 1637 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Epicurus

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages

    "Thanks be to blessed Nature because she has made what is necessary easy to supply, and what is not easy unnecessary... The right understanding of these facts enables us to refer all choice and avoidance to the health of the body and the soul's freedom from disturbance, since this is the aim of the life of blessedness." Epicurus believed in a simplistic way of life. He believed that happiness is not found in living a luxurious, extravagant life, instead it can be found in living a simpler life with fulfillment of basic needs, friends and family. As he said in the above quote “thanks to nature because she has made what is necessary easy to supply and what is not easy unnecessary…”…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Critique logic of Aristotle understands of the nature(s) of the human soul. According to Aristotle, human nature refers to the unique characteristics in a human being. Some of these characteristics include the way of thinking, feeling and acting. These characteristics are in human beings, and they occur naturally, independently of the influence of culture.…

    • 1360 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ivie Eboigbodin Qualitative and Quantitative Pleasures Qualitative and Quantitative pleasures come out of Utilitarianism. Utilitarianism can often be thought of as dangerous and wretched because it allows for seriously immoral acts to take place. Utilitarianism argues for maximum pleasure to take place, but in doing so can allow such acts as rape, torture etc. Therefore many disregard the act because of its possible immoral acts that could take place. However the Philosopher Mill has come up with two different levels of pleasure, qualitative and quantitative, to determine which acts are worth pursuing.…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays