Cynthia Walker Vs Lahoski Case Study

Cynthia Walker v. John A. Lahoski, et al. Critical Thinking

Regardless of the dispute of any business transaction there must be a contract, the contract should be a written contract over a verbal contract. This way you will have a clear description of what each party’s intentions and expectations are well both parties are in agreement. As was his case there is a contract from the agency that the Lahoski went through to find Miss Walker. According, to the text the contract states that Miss Walker is an independent contractor although she did argue that’s Lahoski were her employers that she was not an independent contractor. One of the fax that or not representing the text, what the payroll tax situation was was she paid 100% of her earnings without anything taking out or were items taken out of her paycheck. If items were taken out of her paycheck I believe she would have a reasonable interpretation that the Lahoski were indeed her employers. If the taxes were not taken out she was one knowingly committing tax fraud or she knew that she was an independent contractor because the contract that she signed earlier with the agency.

Additionally, other items that were not disclosed in this scenario may have some weights to the argument. The details of the contract were not provided to us to allow us to read all the …show more content…
If you start ethical decision-making that you are not required to by the contract you initiate you have the potential to be sued and you have no protection as you are going against your own contract and the other party would have the arguments that portion of the contract became void after your ethical decision-making. I believe the company should not from a legal standpoint have any part and ethical