Curley And Johnston Summary

Maureen Curley and Celeste Johnston’s experiment consisted of a “cross-sectional design” (306) for students to be surveyed service formats about psychological treatment after abortion. The questionnaire/survey was instructed to college woman who preferred psychological treatment post-abortion. A total of forty-five students voiced opinions on their personal desires of treatment to decrease distress. Curley and Johnston were able to view the number of requests from young women agreeing to seek treatment. All participants were drafted from the university who signed up after viewing advertisements and other promoted proposals. For four years, data was recorded of the participants to evaluate women who were exposed to abortion and remaining women …show more content…
In conclusion, the study also recognized that women can experience a strong condition of chronic and post-traumatic stress, if sought psychological treatment. Curley and Johnston’s journal discuss earlier studies of background information taken from female participants classified into three experimental groups: women who sought psychological treatment post-abortion, women who did not prefer psychological treatment post-abortion, and women who were not even pregnant at all. Curley and Johnston writes, “The Impact of Event Scale, Perinatal Grief Scale, Beck Depression Inventory and State-Trial Anxiety Inventory were used to measure psychological outcomes after abortion. A MANCOVA analysis found that after adjusting for coexisting psychopathology, participants who preferred treatment for psychological distress after abortion had significantly higher symptoms of psychological stress specific to the abortion on the Impact of Event Scale (IES) when compared to participants who preferred no treatment after abortion.” (305-06) A total of two scales and two inventories, along with an analysis were utilized on the college women in the previous