Essay On Interstate Conflict

Culture, religion, and civilizational fault lines are highly significant and capable of escalating interstate conflict. Especially when it comes to smaller states in the immediate geographical area of others. With a wider audience a state could potentially gain strength enough to surpass neighboring states. I agree with Huntington’s claims involving the reasons why the clash of civilizations worldwide is bound to cause conflicts in the future. I agree with the alternatives Huntington describes for the non-Western states. Interstate conflict will be an important factor in conflict around the globe. Religion will absolutely be motivation for interstate conflict as each civilization can have a wide range of beliefs and values. The differences in culture and religion will produce wide ranging different ways to address important issues such as human rights and …show more content…
To prevent westernization it will be important for each state to come to an agreement and work together. If any of the states have major conflicts within them they will likely crumble and become westernized. It will also be important for Western states to be on the same side and cooperate with each to strengthen their state. As this will allow them to keep their values and beliefs in check and according to the different cultures within the state.
In conclusion, Culture, religion, and civilizational fault lines are highly significant and capable of escalating interstate conflict. Each of those are important in regards to causes of interstate conflict. I agree with Huntington in that the major conflicts to come will arise from the clash of different civilizations. I believe that this clash will stem from interstate conflicts. Culture, religion, and civilizational fault lines are going to be contributing factors to interstate conflict. Each of these will shape the future climate and relations among the various states around the