Bluestone states that preservation has roots in people’s attachments to places in their society (Bluestone, 14). The public's memory and attachment to a place have an impact on the preservation of a cultural landscape or historic site. Bluestone and Wallace highlight how the tool of preservation can be a tool of destruction and how the public’s idea of cultural landscapes has changed over time. Hayden points out the relationship between memory and landscapes, including how a society becomes attached to these sites. The overall theme of the readings is the attachment that society holds to these sites and the connection that this has with the conservation of these landscapes. To understand this, the public historian must look how the meaning
…show more content…
When the idea conservation of cultural landscapes was conceived, the public’s memory was focused on preserving landscapes and certain structures or communities that reminded the public of the past. Bluestone states after the Second World War the idea of preserving landscapes and structures moved to the preservation of structures valued for their architecture instead of historical structures, which resulted in the demolishing of many downtown areas and historic neighborhoods across the nation (Bluestone, 16). When analyzing Bluestone statement this evolving of the meaning of cultural landscapes by the public, shows how the controversy of the public’s memory on a landscape and its value to a community. Relating to the evolving definition of memory and cultural landscape, Wallace writes about society’s demolishing of the older districts not seen in the public’s memory as valuable, for the creation of new roads and buildings for business to benefit their economy (Wallace, 186). Both articles relate to the theme by both showing how the changing meaning of the relationship between memory and cultural landscapes can influence …show more content…
When analyzing the statement, the relationship between memory and landscapes is formed by the culture of society, which then evolves their attachment to these sites. Society's cultural and ethical background that forms their memories and attachment to place also reminds them of their historical roots. Regarding this connection, preserving historical sites connects society’s memory with the site, reminding them of the accomplishments that were made on the site in the past (Bluefield.
When the idea conservation of cultural landscapes was conceived, the public’s memory was focused on preserving landscapes and certain structures or communities that reminded the public of the past. Bluestone states after the Second World War the idea of preserving landscapes and structures moved to the preservation of structures valued for their architecture instead of historical structures, which resulted in the demolishing of many downtown areas and historic neighborhoods across the nation (Bluestone, 16). When analyzing Bluestone statement this evolving of the meaning of cultural landscapes by the public, shows how the controversy of the public’s memory on a landscape and its value to a community. Relating to the evolving definition of memory and cultural landscape, Wallace writes about society’s demolishing of the older districts not seen in the public’s memory as valuable, for the creation of new roads and buildings for business to benefit their economy (Wallace, 186). Both articles relate to the theme by both showing how the changing meaning of the relationship between memory and cultural landscapes can influence …show more content…
When analyzing the statement, the relationship between memory and landscapes is formed by the culture of society, which then evolves their attachment to these sites. Society's cultural and ethical background that forms their memories and attachment to place also reminds them of their historical roots. Regarding this connection, preserving historical sites connects society’s memory with the site, reminding them of the accomplishments that were made on the site in the past (Bluefield.