Each case is unique and has its own details as to how the alleged incident came into play. Therefore, each case needs to be analyzed in detail and reviewed before deciding who is at fault and to what degree they deserve to be punished. In the situation of “The Case of Jeanette M. and the Phone Call” adapted from chapter one of “Medical Law and Ethics” written by Bonnie Fremgen, it describes a medical situation that resulted in the death of an elderly women. The ethical and or legal issues in…
Cruzan v Director, Missouri Department of Health, was a landmark United States Supreme Court decision. This became the first of the “right to die” cases heard by the Court. It brought forth the question: do people maintain a private, personal right to choose when to end their life? This case would spark national debate and an increased interest in “living wills”.…
They wanted to free their daughter from this intolerable suffering. “The quest for legally sanctioned right to die has also arisen from the anguish of patients afflicted with other immobilizing disabilities such as terminal diseases” ( Cruzan v. Missouri: The Right to Die by Lila Perl, Pg 10). The case also involved the medical profession, in charge for saving our lives not taking it away. This was the first time when the court gave its ruling on the issue of right to die and assisted suicide, which made it an high profile case.…
Content of Litigation Plaintiff: Argued the New York ban violates the 14th amendment’s equal protection clause by allowing ill adults to end their own lives. Also brought up the point that there was no direct distinguished difference between the two ways. Defendant: Defended the ban stating that it prolonged the lifespan of the patients and it was valid as it had important public interest that satisfied the constitutional requirements. III.…
Agencies have discretion and they are able to use that discretion as they see fit. However, when a challenge to that discretion becomes an issue, the court can become involved. The two cases are similar because they are challenging an agency’s discretion, but end with two different outcomes. These are very important cases dealing with constitutional rights.…
Sabo looks to medical facts in order to show that keeping someone who is brain dead on life support is unethical. Exploring…
Case: Craig v. Boren, 429 U.S. 190 (1976) Facts: An Oklahoma state statue prohibited males under the age of 21 from purchasing “non-intoxicating” 3.2 percent beer. Craig, a male between the age of 18 and 21 years, and Whitener, a licensed vendor sought injunctive and declaratory relief against the Oklahoma statute. They argued the gender differential between males and women was unconstitutional because it created resentful discrimination against males 18-20 years of age. Whitener brought suit against state official Boren claiming the law violated the 14th Amendment’s equal protection clause.…
I believe that Sue Rodriguez is a strong and independent women. Rodriguez wanted a choice. She said the time and manner of her death shouldn’t be decided by her disease or the law. If she were incapable of taking her own life, she insisted it should be legal for a doctor to provide her with the means to do so. She made the choice to sacrifice, the sacrifice she made in order to make the change which was spending the little time she had left of her life to her wish to be granted and to ensure that other people had the right to an assisted suicide when someone has a terminal illness.…
In 2011, Brown v Plata was a decision by the United States Supreme Court that held that a court-mandated population limit was necessary to remedy a violation of the inmate’s Eighth Amendment constitutional rights. This federal class action civil rights lawsuit alleged that the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation’s (CDCR) medical services were inadequate for the inmates. The lawsuit stated that the CDCR violate not only the Eighth Amendment, but also the American with Disabilities Act and section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. The United States Supreme Court stated that California failed to provide adequate health care to the inmates because of overcrowding in the prisons.…
Tilda is concerned that it is cruel to have a feeding tube located in her windpipe when her lungs are not capable of perfusing. However, when Mrs. Templeton’s son rebels against her concerns, she is left feeling weak due to acting against his wishes. However, Tilda demonstrated advocacy in a positive way because she was displaying patient-centered care when her patient could not speak for herself. Tilda felt it was her responsibility to advocate for her patient because Mrs. Templeton was suffering and experiencing unnecessary pain while trying to keep her alive. “Nurses should protect patients’ right to dignity by advocating for appropriate use of interventions in order to minimize suffering, intervening if other people fail to respect the dignity of the patient, and working to promote health and social conditions that allow patients to live and die with dignity” (Potter & Perry, 2014, p. 128).…
As a result, her family grieves from the loss of a loved one, but they also have to pay for medical bills, that did not help her disease. However, this family’s misery could have been more bearable with assisted suicide, but most states illegalize the cure for terminally ill patients. People who did not vote for assisted suicide states that it goes…
Throughout American society, the citizens believe that they have rights that protect their free will. The citizens assume that every right given to them is for protection. They do not realize that a right can harm them. Truthfully, some of the rights that are given to the people by the governemnt are not benefical. In A Crime of Compassion by Barbara Huttmann, the author expresses her opinion towards the right of being revived.…
race” (Grumberger, 272). Prison officials implemented this policy because they believed racial segregation was a reasonable necessity needed to stop gang violence. In 1995, Johnson filed his original complaint in the United States District Court for the Central District of California (Grumberger, 272). Johnson argued that by assigning cellmates on the basis of race, the CDC violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.…
Justice Stephen Breyer Justice Stephen Breyer has been on the Supreme Court for almost 22 years. He was confirmed to the court by the Senate on June 29, 1994. Justice Breyer’s confirmation was not a surprise considering how highly qualified he was, as well as, how highly others thought of him. For most of Breyer’s adult life he has had an influential role in the legal field. This paper will summarize Justice Stephen Breyer’s early life through today.…
There have been many opinions about the ruling of the United States v. Fields case. In 2011, Abel Fields spoke at a public safety meeting and stated that he had received the Purple Heart and that he was a part of the military for over eight years. However, his claims were false. Some say that his statement is protected under the first amendment, however, it violates the Stolen Valor Act. This case went through different courts and the ruling was in favor of Abel Fields.…