Cruelty Of Animal Testing

Improved Essays
For as long as people can remember there has been animal testing. Labs will use ranging from rabbits to mice in their experiments in medicine and even testing beauty products. In order to be able to able to test certain diseases that these animals do not naturally form like humans, they will be injected into them to mimic the disease. This treatment to animals has been used for years and put them through unnecessary pain. There should get rid of animal testing because it can be unreliable, it’s harmful to the animals used in testing, and there are alternatives to it.
“95% of drugs fail in human trials despite promising results in animal tests.” Thew stated on her website. Animals and humans are similar, yet completely dissimilar. It is not hard to see how giving a rat cancer then curing it of the disease might not work on a human being. A study recently found that there is only forty-three percent of accuracy of there being safety in a drug for humans that have been tested on mice and rats. Several dangerous side effects have been told to have only nineteen percent of them show up in animal testing. There is barely any real insight into seeing if a drug would work for a human being when using it on an animal with how many little similarities there can be.
The
…show more content…
Taking the Polio vaccine, for example, had been tested on animals and that got rid of the disease all together once given to humans after testing. Although it has been helpful with some diseases like finding the hepatitis B vaccine with the use of testing on chimpanzees and taking pancreases out of dogs to discover the use of insulin does not mean animal testing should still be relied on. There is still the fact that ninety-five percent of the drugs that have been tested on animals failed with humans. That five percent of the drugs that actually worked is a very small margin. The chance for failure is much too high with animal testing than it is to actually

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Many products that are tested are tested for safety reasons. According to the FDA about 48% of animal drug testing is successful The Biomedical Research Association has said that almost every single medical breakthrough in the past 100 years has directly come from animal research. While this may be true, however, it also shows that 52% of animal drug tests fail. Thus, animal testing is not valid a majority of the time.…

    • 805 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, it is arguable that animal testing has benefited all living species as a whole. Serena Holloway, the author of “Controversy: Animal testing” writes “Animal research has helped produced vaccines for rabies, tetanus, parvo virus, and a multitude of other illnesses in cats, dogs, and other domesticated animals. It can be argued that animal research has improved the health of all living species.” Animal testing has also led to prevent extinction for species “ including the black-footed ferret, the California condor and the tamarins of Brazil.” (Should Animals Be Used for Scientific or Commercial Testing?)…

    • 619 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal Testing Cosmetics

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages

    With animal testing for drugs, scientists run into many issues. There is the fact that animals, especially rats and dogs are biologically different than humans. It was calculated in a study that, “animal tests and human results are the same only 5% to 25% of the time. Eighty-eight percent of doctors agreed that animal experiments can be misleading ‘because of anatomical and physiological differences between animals and humans.’” Although many drugs passed animal testing, once given to humans, serious illnesses and birth defects started to arise (Stachura 148).…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The re-used animals go through procedures which are potential to cause animal physical as well as psychological distress and suffering. There are perhaps many effects and dangers of these chemicals that are inserted into their bodies. While they languish in pain, due to the circumstances of testing many animals pull out their hair, bite their skin, swell, ulcerate, lick themselves, are paralyzed, and much more. There are many symptoms towards the products tested on them such as: redness, itchiness, bleeding, blindness, diarrhea, convulsions, seizures, weight loss, rash, lesions, scaling, inflammation, skin corrosion, severe skin damage, and more. There are many defects that are occasionally transpired from testing which are: blood disorder, anemia, and, organ defects.…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A human and an animal most likely will not react the same way to certain drugs, some drugs even do not go out into the world after passing the animal tests. Not one animal is perfect and there are still a lot of differences between the animal and a human (“Should Animals Be Used in Research?”). Some of the animal's they test on are dogs, non-human primates, pigs, rabbits, cats, hamsters,…

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One research case that was done found that 95% of drugs tested on animals failed on humans. A total of 93 side effects found on humans, only 19% were predicted on the animals. The same exact study learned that when rats and mice were used for testing, they were only 43% accurate. A particular drug, called Vioxx used for arthritis, showed that it was safe during the animal testing stage. However, in 2004 it was taken off the market.…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the article, “Should Animals Be Used for Scientific or Commercial Testing?” by procon.org, it states that by testing animals with new medications and drugs it has contributed life-saving cures and treatments; in the controversy, people against animal testing believe it is a cruel and ignominious procedure. Furthermore, animals are put through an agonizing amount of pain for the scientific procedures of testing new products and drugs. They are being starved and deprived of water for multiple days to test the reaction of the products.…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Today we are aware that major differences between animals and humans makes it difficult to tell if the drug response in humans will turn out 100% positive. As humans we need to ask ourselves this question “when you need medical treatment, wouldn’t you want a medication that works for you not what works in a completely different species” (navs.org). The drugs that are safe to use on animals might not be safe for humans. One perfect example of that is the thalidomide study. During the 1950s thalidomide was prescribed to pregnant women to help with morning sickness.…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal tests are not only cruel and immoral, but most animals used in tests are impractical due to the differences it has compared to a human. A quote from Thomas Hartung, MD professor “It’s very hard to create an animal model that even equates closely to what we’re trying to achieve in the human.” Drugs that pass using animal experiments are not always safe. An arthritis drug Vioxx, which is like ibuprofen, was tested using mice and caused more than 27,000 heart attacks and sudden cardiac deaths before being recalled.…

    • 2229 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Animal experimentation is not a reliable method to test a product or medicines safety. Jessica Sandler, a former OSHA health and safety official reports that, rats are an animal that should…

    • 1222 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Well the fact is that whether we use animals or not, there will always be a first person to test a new drug. The FDA has noted that 92% of all drugs that are shown to be safe and effective in animal tests fail in human trials because they don’t work or are dangerous. Out of that 8% that pass the human trial, half of them will need to be re- labeled because of side effects that showed in the human test, but not the animal. III. There was a paper published in the British medical Journal titled " Where is the evidence that animal research benefits humans?"…

    • 1390 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Biological implications: There are many positive and negative biological implications. Organisations experiment on vertebrate animals because of their similar nervous system to ours. Meaning that if the animals feel pain from the drug humans are more likely too feel pain too. Although from saying that animals and humans are never exactly the same making the experiment unreliable. Testing on animals can cause suffering and death.…

    • 520 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Most importantly is the fact that animals do not get many of the diseases that humans do including Alzheimer’s disease, diabetes, Parkinson’s disease, or schizophrenia. Therefore, diseases have to be artificially induced in research animals, however, they will never be the same as the diseases that occur naturally in humans. The results of animal testing are misleading and do not improve human health. It only prolongs the discovery of effective cures for people who are suffering. It is proven that “Nine out of ten drugs that appear promising in animal studies go on to fail in human clinical trials” (American Anti-Vivisection Society).…

    • 1100 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animals produce different enzymes which can remove certain diseases that humans can’t just like humans produce different enzymes that animals can’t. Animal’s bodies react differently than the body of a human when it comes to certain diseases. There are some diseases in which the animals reaction was the same as a humans which doesn’t necessarily mean every medication given to animals would work the same in a human. All in all, animal testing should be abolished there is no need to harm animals when there are different procedures in testing medications. With all the technology we have and with all the proof that these other ways to test drugs are safer and have more of an advantage.…

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    ("Using Animals for Testing: Pros Versus Cons." ) Most tests that look promising fail in human clinical trials. Nine out of ten drugs will fail. Animal studies do not reliably predict human outcomes.…

    • 2182 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays