Facts
The crucial role of doctrine in public policy making directly correlates to liberalism, conservatism, and egotism as such has fashioned public policy for centuries. While Shafritz and Borick maintain, “All public policy has its origin in an underlying doctrine. This has been true throughout history.” Indeed, then, there is a distinct relationship between doctrine and policy making. According to the text, an example would be, “…In some states convicted murderers are executed; in others, they are sentenced to long prison terms.” In any case, despite each state’s autonomy, all state governments are a reflection of the federal government which mandates that all doctrine in policies is relative to the republic as they are governed under the Constitution.
Decision
That stated, the decision behind the role of doctrine in policy making assists in evading arbitrary oppression, and allows for independence. In essence, it is the principles that reinforce the legal procedures for state and local governments. Precisely, it speaks to economic ideals, societal inequality, and ethical conduct all of which in some form are inevitably governed by means of philosophy, doctrine, and policies. More important, as Shafritz and Borick insist, doctrine establishes the …show more content…
Simply put, “… Philosophy leads to doctrine which creates policy” On closer examination, we find both sides possess a broad perception of government and doctrinal paradigms As a result, they are often blinded by which political spectrum is more definitive respective to their ideologies. In fairness, such mindsets must be rejected, and clearly the focus centered on the well-being of all within the constraints of broader societal paradigms. As Vesely-Flad argued, “Facing great inequities and ecological degradation, we need purposeful guidance to lead to actions, decisions and policies that will help create a world with enough for
The crucial role of doctrine in public policy making directly correlates to liberalism, conservatism, and egotism as such has fashioned public policy for centuries. While Shafritz and Borick maintain, “All public policy has its origin in an underlying doctrine. This has been true throughout history.” Indeed, then, there is a distinct relationship between doctrine and policy making. According to the text, an example would be, “…In some states convicted murderers are executed; in others, they are sentenced to long prison terms.” In any case, despite each state’s autonomy, all state governments are a reflection of the federal government which mandates that all doctrine in policies is relative to the republic as they are governed under the Constitution.
Decision
That stated, the decision behind the role of doctrine in policy making assists in evading arbitrary oppression, and allows for independence. In essence, it is the principles that reinforce the legal procedures for state and local governments. Precisely, it speaks to economic ideals, societal inequality, and ethical conduct all of which in some form are inevitably governed by means of philosophy, doctrine, and policies. More important, as Shafritz and Borick insist, doctrine establishes the …show more content…
Simply put, “… Philosophy leads to doctrine which creates policy” On closer examination, we find both sides possess a broad perception of government and doctrinal paradigms As a result, they are often blinded by which political spectrum is more definitive respective to their ideologies. In fairness, such mindsets must be rejected, and clearly the focus centered on the well-being of all within the constraints of broader societal paradigms. As Vesely-Flad argued, “Facing great inequities and ecological degradation, we need purposeful guidance to lead to actions, decisions and policies that will help create a world with enough for