Critique Of Policy Response Meeting Master Plan Objectives Essay

1914 Words Nov 30th, 2014 null Page
CRITIQUE OF POLICY RESPONSE IN MEETING MASTER PLAN OBJECTIVES
The Master Plan successfully completed all of its primary objectives early in its implementation. Statistics show that when the Master Plan was established in 1960, only eleven percent of working-age adults in California had a college degree; as of 2010, it has risen to thirty-one percent (Johnson 2010). The Plan created a unified system with specific responsibilities as well as different admission pools for the three higher education institutions. Yet despite the relevance and significance of this framework, the Master Plan has flaws. While all three segments have worked hard to increase access and equity, none have been able to keep up educational, economic and demographic changes that have impacted the state (IHELP 2014). Over the decades since its implementation, the Master Plan seen issues developed with the lack of formal authority given to, and leading to the elimination of, the California Postsecondary Education Commission, overlapping conflicts between the UC and CSU, and increased stress on the CCC resulting in limited transfer rates.
Elimination of the California Postsecondary Education Commission
Before the elimination of the California Postsecondary Education Commission (CPEC), many studies called for clarity of its multiple duties. Additionally, several identified an intrinsic conflict between CPEC’s coordination and advocacy responsibilities, and its role as the independent fiscal and policy…

Related Documents