• Home Page
  • Aristotle's Critique Nature Of The Human Soul

Aristotle's Critique Nature Of The Human Soul

Improved Essays
Show More
Critique logic of Aristotle understands of the nature(s) of the human soul.

According to Aristotle, human nature refers to the unique characteristics in a human being. Some of these characteristics include the way of thinking, feeling and acting. These characteristics are in human beings, and they occur naturally, independently of the influence of culture. He believed that both body and soul are parts of human nature.

The soul is the total of the operations of human beings. Aristotle tries to explain his understanding between body and soul using an analogy of an axe. He explained that the body would be metal and wood. Its soul would be its ability to chop. If it lost its soul, the body would only remain and would only be wood and metal. Soul and matter co exists. There is no way soul and matter could exist separately. He also believed that the there exists a hierarchy of living things. Plants are the least in the hierarchy since they have vegetative soul. Vegetative souls only have nutritive value. Animals are the second in the hierarchy since they have an appetite. Humans are the highest in the hierarchy since they have the power to reason. He also puts it that one requires philosophizing in order to discern …show more content…
This means the work that one does and their position in the society. Some of the positions in the society are teachers, doctors, nurses among other occupations. These positions are not gained through pleasure. One has to work hard to get them. Aristotle claims that man does not as anticipated have a purpose when being born. Society determines their functions. However, the would-be to harbor intrinsic worth is an element of human nature. There is however a component linking our hedonistic to nature. This component is called eudemonia. Eudemonia is rather based within human natural history, but requires a social participation in order to attain

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Human Nature In Olaudah Equiano, And Thomas Jefferson
    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Human Nature In Olaudah Equiano, And Thomas Jefferson

    Human nature is the way a human thinks, feels, and behaves. The authors; Jonathan Edwards, Olaudah Equiano, and Thomas Jefferson learn the importance of understanding human nature in Early American Texts, through written history. They all have distinctive views of human nature through the relationship of the government, law, religion, and equality. Edwards and Equiano are quite similar, believing human nature is cruel and brutal, whereas Jefferson differs from the two, believing in equality between the people. They use rhetorical strategies such as; imagery, connotative diction, and parallelism to reveal how human nature should be carefully understood to be protected from being manipulated and to understand where it stands in society.…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Aristotle's Argument On Human Good
    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Aristotle's Argument On Human Good

    In Aristotle 's argument for the ultimate human good and how it relates to virtue is not so much a search for good for goods sake but for the highest good that a human being can ascertain in that persons experience and travels in life. So then how is it that Aristotle argument has validity to an over all understanding or relation to virtue? It is not an easy philosophical quandary to disseminate considering other philosophers have studied Aristotle 's teachings and spent the most part of their careers arguing against (in cases) this very prose.…

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Aristotle's Argument Essay: What Is Good For Man
    • 132 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Aristotle's Argument Essay: What Is Good For Man

    The philosopher believes that by our nature, we are meant to aspire to a life of excellence and that we are rational and social animals that have habits of thought and feeling. Aristotle believes that we should adopt ways to continually have a well rounded…

    • 132 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Letters To Herodotus Analysis
    • 946 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Letters To Herodotus Analysis

    The underlying reason for the soul being a special material is that it affects not just our daily bodily processes, but also immaterial things (i.e. sensations of love, happiness, betrayal that are not tied down to one specific part of the body). This is significant because he means that if a person were to lose his arm, he would still be able to experience things like love and happiness. Even though he has lost part of the body (and therefore some little part of the soul that caused sensations in his arm), the rest of his soul remains intact so he is not deprived of the feeling of other sensations. In this sense, the body cannot produce sensation on its own and needs the soul. In this way, the soul acts upon the body (i.e. causes/creates sensations that can be felt), but it is also dependent on the body because the body acts on the soul through providing a vehicle for things to be felt; after death, the body ceases to exist and the soul has nothing through which to furnish sensations.…

    • 946 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Plato's Timaeus: The Story Of Creation
    • 1434 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Plato's Timaeus: The Story Of Creation

    The soul is in the center, spread throughout the body. It was created before the body to act as a ruler and control the body, its subject. God made the soul out of three elements: the same, the other and the essence. He then blended them into one form and again divided by proportions until he was satisfied with the result. “The body of heaven is visible, but the soul is invisible, and partakes of reason and harmony, and being made by the…

    • 1434 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Forms Of Being Vs. Being In Plato's Republic
    • 1520 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Forms Of Being Vs. Being In Plato's Republic

    Unlike his mentor Plato, Aristotle believed that the essence of all beings is Substance. Substance is the first principle of all things, according to Aristotle (VII, 1). The philosopher defines substance as that which cannot be predicated, but that “of which all else is predicated” (VII, 3). Everything else, such as matter, qualities of the matter, and etc., proceed substance. And in order to come to these conclusions about the essence of the world, Aristotle uses the methods of scientific inquiry, experimentation, and deductive reasoning.…

    • 1520 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes Vs Augustine Analysis
    • 1089 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Hobbes Vs Augustine Analysis

    Meaning if your soul does something For example, if your soul does something wrong the body feels it as well as the soul. According to Aristotle “If the soul bears the same relationship to the body which the shape of a statue bears to its material basis, then we should expect some general features to be common to both; and we should be able to draw some immediate consequences regarding the relationship between soul and body”(Shields). This quote means the Body and Soul are equal to one another, they are not different, but the same if the body does something wrong the soul will feel it, for example, if the body committed a sin such as killing another person the body would not be the only one to feel it but the soul as well. Aristotle believes that the soul is a subject of the mental states which can exist alone, when separated from the body. The only way when the soul is separated from the body is during sleeping hours.…

    • 1089 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Role Of The Soul In Plato's Republic
    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Role Of The Soul In Plato's Republic

    Throughout the Republic, Plato mentions the soul several times. Plato agrees that the soul is immortal and separate from the body. He also believes that the soul is eternal and according to Plato, the soul doesn’t come into existence with the body, but rather exists prior to being with the body. He believed that the soul exists inside the body until it dies. Because of this, Plato called the body the prison to the soul.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Summary Of David Hull's On Human Nature Refutation
    • 1136 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Summary Of David Hull's On Human Nature Refutation

    “On Human Nature” Refutation David Hull’s “On Human Nature” is an article written to oppose human nature. Specifically, it challenges human evolution as the cause of universality/commonality of human traits. The case made in the article utilizes the logic behind Charles Darwin’s theory of natural selection: evolutionary changes come via the generation of variation in each generation and differential survival of individuals with different combinations of these varying traits. The central thesis of “On Human Nature” is that any common set of traits that people share is due to chance as opposed to the inner workings of evolution.…

    • 1136 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Pursuit Of Virtue In Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics
    • 1453 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Pursuit Of Virtue In Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics

    “Every art and every inquiry, and likewise every action and choice, seems to aim at some good, and hence it has been beautifully said that the good is that at which all things aim.” As Aristotle makes inquires and deliberates over what is the highest end for the human life, he debates over what constitutes the highest good. Throughout the Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle argues that we aim at some end through our pursuits of action, and that those ends are in some way connected at achieving the highest good. Aristotle suggests the possibility of happiness, translated from the Greek word eudaimonia, which refers to a “state of having a good indwelling spirit or being in a contented state of being healthy, happy and prosperous.” For the one who…

    • 1453 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Plato's Final Argument For The Imorality Of The Soul
    • 1675 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Plato's Final Argument For The Imorality Of The Soul

    Snow can be destroyed by the presence of heat. I feel we can make the same argument for the soul. Even though the soul cannot admit death, it seems that it should be able to be destroyed in its presence. There does not seem to me to be any reason why the same logic could not be applied. Socrates refutes this by suggesting that what is deathless is also indestructible; therefore, the soul cannot be destroyed.…

    • 1675 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Aristotle Happiness And Virtue Essay
    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Aristotle Happiness And Virtue Essay

    1. What, according to Aristotle, is the relationship between happiness and virtue? Working to possess and exercise virtue is essential to achieve the highest degree of happiness. Virtuousness is a unique element of happiness in the sense that we can work to control it through our own habituation. This can be compared to the plethora of components that our disposition creates a predetermined outcome for, including the external and physical goods we desire. Aristotle expands on this idea, stating that when happiness, “...comes as a result of virtue and some process of learning or training, [it is] among the most god-like things; for that which is the prize and end of virtue seems to be the best thing in the world, and something godlike and blessed” (Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics, 947).…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Aristotle And Aristotle: Aristotle's Theory Of Dualism
    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Aristotle And Aristotle: Aristotle's Theory Of Dualism

    Contrasting Plato’s theory of Dualism , Aristotle explains that the body and mind are one thing that cannot be separated. Aristotle claims that motion is eternal. Introducing us the idea of happiness, Aristotle questions what we do to make our life good or something that makes us be alive. He states that the psyche or soul part of our life like happiness consists a good life for humans.…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Compare And Contrast Aristotle And Epicurus
    • 1777 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Compare And Contrast Aristotle And Epicurus

    Everything according to Aristotle is created and given a specific purpose. This idea would be beneficial for the whole of society because if everyone understands their purpose or functionality or is working towards it, the society will always be working towards a positive goal of self-sufficiency and sustainability. If a society was led by Epicurus’ idea with humans maximizing their happiness and decreasing their suffering, happiness comes at a cost. In a hedonistic society, the cost of…

    • 1777 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Plato's Theory Of Human Nature
    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Plato's Theory Of Human Nature

    Human nature is a theory that’s been a debated for centuries upon centuries. Philosophers have argued the concept for as long humans have been on this earth. Perhaps none the wiser than Plato, Socrates and Aristotle .The seemingly underlying truth is that there are characteristics; thinking, acting, feeling. That we all experience consciously or sub-consciously that make humans do the things that they do.…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2024 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings