Importance Of Civil Disobedience

Superior Essays
I have always wanted to start my own country. I feel disenfranchised by the political systems in my country, the United States, because I don’t have values in alignment with any major political party. I’m sick and tired of following pointless laws and paying taxes to subsidise programs and facilities that I disagree with when there are programs that I would appreciate the existence of that nobody else seems to care for the creation of. In all honesty, I think that the United States is misappropriating funding and is imposing laws on me that are simply dumb; what are my options to remove myself from this process and what are the options for other people like me? Efforts to distance someone from the laws of their government should manifest primarily …show more content…
In the twentieth century alone, it has been used in Panama, Kenya, the Philippines and China with varying levels of success. One prominent use of the technique was in the Philippines where the Tagumpay Bayan civil disobedience campaign to dispute a rigged election employed to reduce government power was a general boycott of paying for and using government run businesses and even water supplies. In keeping with the theme of risk management, no participants were able to be targeted by their government because of the shear number of participants in the move. Additionally, the unfairly elected president was forced to leave the country. The campaign was effective in assisting people in making meaningful change to their government and had no negative consequences for its …show more content…
It allows for people to push against different issues that they find wrong and when enough people join civil disobedience movements it allows for people to be free from consequence when doing so. Much like a right, civil disobedience inhibits a majority from negatively impacting a minority. Spitz argues that democracy means that people should follow what a majority says, but this removes debate from issues and stops people from changing their minds on issues with the release of new viewpoints and information. It stops the ability for a democratic system to be adaptable and squashes debate for the sake of comradery. Civil disobedience does a good thing in fighting against tyrannical majorities and should be praised for this, not

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Some laws are just so unacceptable that is not only the people’s right, but duty to disobey them. Following the laws that govern us blindly is a dangerous way to live. It is acceptable to go against the government when the government threatens lives of innocents and restricts free will, when the government loses the best interest of those it governs, and when the government neglects to acknowledge the voices of the people. It can only be expected that people…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Time and again, people will experience a difference in belief and want to restructure pieces of legislation (Olsen). In other cases, there needs to be a propulsion for a difference in belief. This propulsion is civil disobedience, which decreases the likelihood of unfair legislation. Since several laws are unfair as laws are biased, civil disobedience is a means of defense for minority groups. Minorities are suppressed, even in a democratic society.…

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many people believe censorship is helpful. In the article, “Pros and Cons of Censorship,” Prabhakar states, “It protects the privacy of people.” To explain, Censorship helps protect anything important from people. It is understandable why the opposition believes censorship helps protect the privacy of many people because people do not want their personal belongings use against them. Though they make a good point, censorship stills harms people’s capability of learning the real truth about stuff their interest…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    There are times when a time for change has come and that time can be because politicians refuse to listen to the people or take action about a cause. Though not engaging is just as hard as not engaging in the situation. There is no limit to the amount of injustices committed and it is unfortunate though there the time when the people must go against other people. The goal is to be non violent however there are times when violent actions occur and this causes the public to suffer. The goal is to justify everyone through fair play or Distributive justice which defined as fairness for the people.…

    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He was also majorly exposed when it came to his presidential election, while Nixon was old, nasty, and went through the accusations and name calling due to the Watergate scandal. Nixon’s and his reelection comity team failed to retrieve the wire taps, caught, persecuted, and traced back to Nixon. No lie or action is good if you need to hide it by sending a cover up burglars and the people that you are hiding it from is the American public. Nixon was considered a great president to the American people. He ended American involvement in the war in Vietnam, brought American POWs back home, and shut off the military draft that had the American public frighten due to the fear of going to war.…

    • 1346 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They all know that the government will not help us because they don’t want to. “Most of them have the sense that government works for a few and government has failed the American people as whole seems like America is losing ground in the world.” (Ingraham, Susteren 131-132) So they have all taken it into their own hand to try and step up and be what America need right now. Government is a very complex system. Nobody truly understands government so everyone makes up their own opinions on how it is meant to be run. This has been the root of America’s problem.…

    • 1714 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    And if a government could perform their role in protecting people’s right, no harm should occur to such a society. Civil disobedience is a political act that should be exercised with a good aim to fight for public goods. It’s also crucial to be peaceful and non-violent. Civil disobedience exposes society to harm. It may encourage disrespect towards legal system, it could paralyze financial development and interfere with people’s daily living.…

    • 912 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    When totalitarianism is embraced, the citizens forfeit their individual rights and freedoms. While a temporary situation of putting them aside to resolve a dangerous situation such as a natural disaster, health crisis, war, or mass casualty event is acceptable, an extended term without rights for citizens is a catalyst to a further rejection of liberalism. As soon as the government takes away something from its citizens, it can be difficult for them to give it back. It also opens the door to take away more and more rights. Totalitarianism is dangerous, but in some cases it is necessary to protect citizens and allow the government to pursue their goals as…

    • 1121 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He argues in “On the Duty of Civil Disobedience” that the government no longer does what it was created to do; subjects people to follow and support its decisions, without necessarily informing people of their choice; and limits the freedoms people have in society. Thoreau wants to convince his readers to begin thinking and living in the manner he does. His arguments ultimately lead his audience to experience feelings of injustice, and want to become more involved in deciding how they are governed through the use of civil…

    • 1184 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    America could not grow as a country as seen through its economy and foreign affairs, but it really was impossible to get anything done within the Articles due to its restrictions because disunity would never allow for decisions to be made. For example, In the letter from Rhode Island Assembly to Congress, national taxes are being argued against because it would be wrong to impose power on all of the states, but they say that the tax would be unequal in being much harder on the more commercial states. All of the states had their own interests, and this made passing any national laws relatively impossible due to the unanimous vote that it would have taken to change anything worthwhile. The tariffs might have been workable within less commercial states and they might have allowed or supported it, but because the commercial states did not agree with it, it was never passed. This reigned true for all interstate matters.…

    • 1316 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays