In the first perspective it explains that you, as a person should focus on self improvement and become more self reliant. I honestly think as an opinion you would need to keep boosting people's spirits instead of being self centered because you don't want to make them feel good. Everyone has their own traits, personality, and characteristics, but if you don't care about other people, it shows you that you are careless about the good people on this earth.
A strength of the first perspective is that you can get things accomplished and succeed in goals in your lifetime. It means you could care more about what you want to get done, that could be a good thing. A weakness would be that it couldn't be good for relationships with people. Making …show more content…
I agree that if someone is down and feeling low, you would want to give them confidence booster, and make them feel better, lie or not. If someone says, ¨ Do I look ugly?” you wouldn't want to say, ¨ Yes you do.¨ You would say they wouldn't and give them the support and confidence they wanted. If someone lets you borrow something and you say thank you, that makes them feel good and happy about themselves.
I think society depends on people who care more about people than themselves. It helps a lot of people in certain circumstances. At a job you would have the common courtesy to treat your boss, coworkers and others like you would anyone else. Common and random acts of kindness could help anyone and everything. Charity organizations matter and depend on ¨good¨ gestures and most people feel good after learning they just helped one in need. It´s a good feeling that everyone should know how it feels. Even if it´s not in your personality trait or characteristic.
In perspective 3, it explains that others should be put first and that we, people, shouldn't be the center of everything. Everyone should live to help others. Wanting it or not, you should be kind to those around you. We all learned it in kindergarten, so I think adults that are self centered are being rude that they can't or don't want to, help or relate to random acts of
A strength of the first perspective is that you can get things accomplished and succeed in goals in your lifetime. It means you could care more about what you want to get done, that could be a good thing. A weakness would be that it couldn't be good for relationships with people. Making …show more content…
I agree that if someone is down and feeling low, you would want to give them confidence booster, and make them feel better, lie or not. If someone says, ¨ Do I look ugly?” you wouldn't want to say, ¨ Yes you do.¨ You would say they wouldn't and give them the support and confidence they wanted. If someone lets you borrow something and you say thank you, that makes them feel good and happy about themselves.
I think society depends on people who care more about people than themselves. It helps a lot of people in certain circumstances. At a job you would have the common courtesy to treat your boss, coworkers and others like you would anyone else. Common and random acts of kindness could help anyone and everything. Charity organizations matter and depend on ¨good¨ gestures and most people feel good after learning they just helped one in need. It´s a good feeling that everyone should know how it feels. Even if it´s not in your personality trait or characteristic.
In perspective 3, it explains that others should be put first and that we, people, shouldn't be the center of everything. Everyone should live to help others. Wanting it or not, you should be kind to those around you. We all learned it in kindergarten, so I think adults that are self centered are being rude that they can't or don't want to, help or relate to random acts of