The definition of Critical theory is basically the one that unmasks how communication can perpetuate the unjust power and the unbalance of society. It is a philosophical approach to life and a specific culture; especially to literature with a concentration in confronting constrains within social, historical, ideological forces and structures. Critical theory is ambiguous enough to make clear valuable judgments concerning patterns of communication and enhance the types that promote a better social world. Critical theory is also a judgment call by an individual based on what that label means to the person (Griffin, E. 2012).
Rieke, R., Sillars, M., & Peterson, T. (1993) states the argument of Critical theorists is that humans should be more …show more content…
A. (2002) interpretive theory has the shared assumption that we cannot understand human affairs properly unless we grasp the relevant meanings. There are many different versions of the interpretive theory with understand meanings in different ways such as reasons, beliefs and/or intentions. Interpretive theory is an alternative to positivist sociology and it is rooted in the concept of understand of subjective experience, versus a rigid adherence about observation and facts: which basically means there can be a variety of different accurate viewpoints within the context of social facts and that claims based on sociological facts may not always be correct.
The difference of interpretive theory and critical theory is that interpretive theory is focused on the inside to understand of why vs. Critical theory which seeks to change the society. Critical Theory blames society while the interpretive waits for a true critical explanation of society.
Ideas and framework is pushed to its limits by Critical Social Theory mainly by highlighting their contradictions. Critical theory functions in several different ways such as quality of education, deconstruction, and then reconstruction within the interest of emancipation. On-the-other- hand interpretive criteria for enhances solidarity, foster intersubjective agreements in communities recognize contingency and help offer a better way of being (Bohman, James.
Rieke, R., Sillars, M., & Peterson, T. (1993) states the argument of Critical theorists is that humans should be more …show more content…
A. (2002) interpretive theory has the shared assumption that we cannot understand human affairs properly unless we grasp the relevant meanings. There are many different versions of the interpretive theory with understand meanings in different ways such as reasons, beliefs and/or intentions. Interpretive theory is an alternative to positivist sociology and it is rooted in the concept of understand of subjective experience, versus a rigid adherence about observation and facts: which basically means there can be a variety of different accurate viewpoints within the context of social facts and that claims based on sociological facts may not always be correct.
The difference of interpretive theory and critical theory is that interpretive theory is focused on the inside to understand of why vs. Critical theory which seeks to change the society. Critical Theory blames society while the interpretive waits for a true critical explanation of society.
Ideas and framework is pushed to its limits by Critical Social Theory mainly by highlighting their contradictions. Critical theory functions in several different ways such as quality of education, deconstruction, and then reconstruction within the interest of emancipation. On-the-other- hand interpretive criteria for enhances solidarity, foster intersubjective agreements in communities recognize contingency and help offer a better way of being (Bohman, James.