Critical Race Theoretical Analysis

The critical race theory for regulating hate speech online corners on the preservation of human dignity amongst hate speech on the internet. These theorists propose internet regulation, or limiting the ability of hate groups to post their agendas or views online, as a solution. In the eyes of a critical race theorist, hate speech online has the potential to incite violent acts and perpetuate a culture of oppression through politically charged rhetoric. This theory recognizes innate power hierarchies within digital discourse that must be considered when classifying speech as hateful. In turn, critical race theorists place those on the receiving end of hate speech at the center of their argument; Because America has increasingly become a beacon for white supremacy online, the internet cannot be left as a law-free zone.
In contrast, cyberlibertarians approach the internet through a lens of absolutism. While critical race theorists offer a plan of responsible limitation, cyberlibertarians propose free speech …show more content…
The Chinese government offered access in exchange for restrictions on its citizens’ ability to search, view, and participate in internet searches about human rights, democracy, Tibet, Taiwan, and the Tiananmen Square uprising (170). These restrictions placed on oppositional speech towards the Chinese government is a poignant example regarding implications of limited speech. The United States holds a large amount of economic, political, and social power. Speaking from the view of a cyberlibertarian, US policies regarding online restrictions may have problematic influence on restrictive policies enacted in countries with varied definitions of hate speech (178). Daniel’s exemplifies this point: “Given that the racist state implements systemic racism […] the notion that the state might be an effective arbiter of white supremacy online seems deeply flawed”