Natural Law: Philosopher Thomas Hobbes Leviathan

Improved Essays
Student ID: 20388703
Ethics. Dr. Fisher
Natural Laws (Hobbes) - Critical Essay #1

“Solitary, poor, nasty, brutish and short” (Hobbes, 78), is how Philosopher Thomas Hobbes would describe his state of nature in his 1651 book, the “The Leviathan”. In Hobbes’ state of nature, also know as the state of war, there consists of no central government. Without this governing body or set of laws, the individuals within this state of nature are competing for scarce resources and resorting to anything as long as it assures them food, shelter, and mates. Individuals will always live in fear in this state of war, scared to progress or enrich their own lives with the fear that they could be killed or have their possessions stolen at any given moment. For
…show more content…
These extreme conditions and casting of individuals to fend for themselves in an all out war makes the state of war an undesirable place to live. Fortunately for these individuals, there are opportunities to guarantee their well-being in this state of nature. Hobbes notes that the social contract theory is an agreement among two individuals within a society built on trust and verbal agreement. Whether this be an agreement to not steal each other 's crops, or stealing money, or even killing each other, social contracts allow individuals to form a bond that will help each other to succeed within their society. Hobbes elaborates by explaining that “he which declares he thinks it reason to deceive those that help him can in reason expect no other means of safety than what can be had from his own single power” (Hobbes, 90). In other words, two individuals would understand that this is in the best interest for the both of them in the long run, since breaking the social contract would make themselves vulnerable to thievery and murder, there is more incentive to abide by the social contract you form, since the benefit of safety and the ability to flourish far outweigh the consequences. Bonds formed by …show more content…
Hobbes’ state of nature is of neutral morality. Since the environment is amoral, only the individuals within it can disrupt this neutrality. Individuals can choose to act immorally by lying, stealing, or committing murder since there is no culture to indicate to them that it is wrong. However, if they choose to not abide by their natural rights, they are prone to the same consequences from the acts they commit. While cultural relativism looks back at the culture to decipher right and wrong, Hobbes’ viewpoint suggests that individuals are right until they commit a crime and then they are deemed wrong. The issue is in a state of nature, we cannot look back to a culture to decide for ourselves what is moral and immoral in a state of war when there are individuals who are not bound by laws or a governing body to oversee them. Additionally, Hobbes would agree that the idea of cultural relativism itself can serve as its own governing body over a culture. It can serve as a set of invisible rules that are followed within cultures when the individuals within them question the morality of an act. Similar to the state of war, social contracts help to anchor the relationships and common interests of individuals. Culture in itself serves as

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Hobbes

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages

    An individual risks dangers by opting out from the theoretical peace treaty. However, there exists similar dangers In…

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In an excerpt from Leviathan by Thomas Hobbes, he describes his theory about the conditions of a society which has no governing body to control it. When there is no government, we live in a state of nature; a state of total freedom where we can do whatever we want at any time. If there is no government, there are no set laws, and therefore no limits on human actions. There are also no formal consequences for actions that may cause harm to others. You could do anything you want if it will benefit you since there is no sure punishment.…

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Meng Tzu Case Study

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In that state of nature we respond to others in three different ways. First, competition, which is what we invade to take what another has for ourselves. Second, diffidence, which is when we fear another and have a desire for safety in order to retain what we already have. Lastly, the strife for glory, which is when we worry about appearing significant in another’s eyes. A society with laws and moral codes can be instituted from a state of nature because Hobbes believed a society is formed is due to fear and the desire for security.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    (1 pt.) Hobbes’s opinions on the state of nature are that people are constantly fighting with others for more power. Hobbes says that the “three principal causes of quarrel” are “competition; secondly, diffidence; thirdly, glory.” He also states that The first maketh men invade for gain; the second, for safety; and the third, for reputation”.. Lastly, he says that this giht for power is like a war between men.…

    • 1724 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The State of Nature, in Hobbes’s opinion, is the equal opportunities of ability and desire which creates conflict, which makes people enemies of each others. He believes…

    • 2532 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Do you have an unquenchable and selfish desire for power? According to Thomas Hobbes take on human nature, you do. This view will be examined by asking; Does Hobbes’s account of why life would be so bad in the ‘state of nature’ rest on a false assumption about human nature? Who is Thomas Hobbes will be the first premise for investigation then The ‘state of nature’ as defined by Hobbes will be described then assessed.…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes Vs Kant Analysis

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Both Thomas Hobbes and Immanuel Kant envision the state of nature as one of insecurity, fear, and mistrust, with Hobbes stepping so far as to call the state of nature a “state of war.” Both philosophers accordingly believe that only under an externally imposed contract can this state of fear lessen and can interests be kept in check, even if competition cannot be halted. Hobbes and Kant emerge from the same place in evaluating the necessity of a contract between parties, but it is within the implications of their ideas of competition that the two philosophers diverge in notions of politics and morality. Kant, speaking with a teleological voice akin to Aristotle’s, posits that once a social contract is created amongst the people and their sovereign,…

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    A law of nature is defined, by Hobbes, as “a precept or general rule found out by reason by which a man is forbidden to do that which is destructive to his life, or takes away the means of preserving the same, and to omit that by which he thinks it may be best preserved.” This definition, put into simpler terms, says that a natural law is something that should be easily grasped, like common sense, and something that provides an individual with the means to protect his own life. The idea that there is a natural state of warfare, where every man is in conflict with every other man, has already been introduced. This state provides “no security to any man” according to Hobbes, so out of the fear of death and their own, natural, desires for a comfortable life, men are naturally inclined to make peace. “To seek peace and to follow it” is the first of the most basic natural laws.…

    • 1569 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Locke defines nature as a “state of perfect equality, where naturally there is no superiority or jurisdiction of one over another” (Wootton, 288). Hobbes believes that the entire time that man is in a state of nature, he is in a state of war. He states that “if any two men cannot enjoy the same thing, they become enemies and in the way to their end…. endeavor to destroy or subdue one another” (Wootton, 158). Locke fears that within the “law of nature,” society may implement decisions, therefore resulting to a state of war.…

    • 1941 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes Government

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In some of his first works, he only says that there need be a highest sovereign authority of some kind in the community, without saying definitively which sort of sovereign government is best. In Leviathan, however, Hobbes unequivocally demonstrates that absolutist regime is the only right form of control. In general, Hobbes attempts to define the reasonable bases upon which a local society could be created that would not be subjected to decay from inside. Accordingly, he describes how best to reduce friction, conflict, and factionalism within community—whether between state and religion, between rival parties, or between different contending opinions. Hobbes thinks that any such action leads to civil war.…

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In Thomas Hobbes book “The Leviathan” Hobbes has stated how we as humans come to live in society in where we are by nature equal in power, and even the weakest of man can simply scheme to kill the strongest. This is achieved by joining hands with others that are in the same position as the first individual. These aspects according to Hobbs combined with limited resources, and a natural distrust amongst man leads to a “perpetual state of conflict”. Without a common power or government to control man and distribute resources so that there is no need for fighting man live in constant anarchy. We live in constant distrust that is why we have weapons, and that is why we have locks to shield our homes, it is in only in our nature.…

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    CONTRACTARIANISM INTRODUCTION “Any of the various theories that justify moral principles and political choices because they depend on a social contract involving certain ideal conditions. A general ethical theory, that individuals make the right choices under a hypothetical social contract.” (www.dictionary.com) “Contractarianism, which stems from the Hobbesian line of social contract thought, holds that persons are primarily self-interested, and that a rational assessment of the best strategy for attaining the maximization of their self-interest will lead them to act morally (where the moral norms are determined by the maximization of joint interest) and to consent to governmental authority. Contractualism, which stems from the Kantian…

    • 1057 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Life in the State of Nature was describes by Hobbes as being ‘solitary’, ‘poor’, ‘nasty’, ‘brutish’, and ‘short’. Hobbes also believed humans have a natural desire for security and order. And in order to secure self-protection and to avoid misery and pain, societies began entering into contracts. These ideas of self-defense are inherent to human nature and in order to achieve this people would voluntarily surrender their rights and freedoms to a Leviathan via contract who would command obedience. This led…

    • 1704 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Thomas Hobbes is a well renowned philosopher, specifically in the world of political philosophy. His work the Leviathan opened up revolutionary ideas that were beyond his time. Hobbes wrote the “Leviathan” during the English Civil War, a war caused by religion and violently ending with the beheading of the king. Hobbes watched this madness unfold, leading him to extend a “helping hand” over to England authority, by publicizing a solution for all to read. His work introduced a radical topic by the name of “Social Contract,” which proposed that a person’s morals and/or political obligations are dependent on an agreement to form or coexist in a society.…

    • 1364 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Hobbes wants the society to work together meaning giving some rights up in exchange for protection. “This equality of ability produces equality of hope for the attaining of our goals” (Thomas Hobbes). For example, if two people want something they both can’t enjoy or use then they quickly become enemies. Hobbes view, “A law of nature is a command or general rule, discovered by reason, which forbids a man to do anything that is destructive of his life or takes away his means for preserving his life, and forbids him to omit anything by which he thinks his life can best be preserved” (Leviathan, Chapter 14). Those who debate this subject often mistake right and law to be the same yet they ought to be distinguished.…

    • 1796 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays