Passive Euthanasia Summary

Good Essays
The article by author James Rachel is a crucial criticism to the doctrine accepted by the doctors that is endorsed in a statement by the American Medical Association. The main argument is challenging the conventional doctrine of using passive euthanasia i.e. letting the patient die then active euthanasia i.e. killing the patient directly, even though the latter one is considered more humane than the former. He supports this argument by saying that for a patient with an incurable disease, it is better to kill the patient saving them from the pain and suffering, rather then just ceasing the treatment and letting them suffer until they die. Secondly, the author argues that conventional doctrine leading to their decisions is based on irrelevant …show more content…
Active euthanasia is defined, as the intentional act of causing the death if a patient is suffering from illness that is incurable in a biological perspective i.e. biological death is imminent. And passive euthanasia is defined as withdrawal of treatment to a patient and allowing them to die. The conventional doctrine states that there is a moral difference between the two, and consider the latter one as being more permissible than the former one. But the author argues that these two in it self has no moral importance. And to investigate the same issue, he considered two cases that are exactly alike except that one involves letting someone die and the other involves killing. He suggests that it is important to have all the other conditions alike for making the only difference the obvious choice for any variation in the assessment. And the important extracts from the case he stated in the article are: 1) Smith kills his cousin for money 2) Jones lets his cousin die for money. Just looking at the statement, the first judgment would be that killing is worse than letting die. But the author questions that judgment stating that both the men acted for the same motive of killing the cousin, and that their action cannot be assessed differently …show more content…
Most of the cases of letting die are the actions of doctors that are motivated by humanitarian reasons, and are heard of rarely. And it is very easy to mix up the question of whether killing is worse than letting die and if the actual cases of killing are more reprehensible than cases of letting die. The author states this as one of the reason why he thinks that is tough for people to accept the judgment that there is no moral difference between killing and letting

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Allowing the government to legally kill the guilty person is wrong, and violates this person’s legal rights. Burns thinks that by killing the person we have alleviate the anger, and have rid the world of that wicked person. We have somehow, gained retribution for the act they have committed, and shown others that we do not allow this act. But, I believe by allowing the courts to legally kill we are promoting the act of killing. We are saying it is OK, to kill someone if they have killed someone you love.…

    • 1468 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Callahan objects to Rachels and Brock’s arguments for euthanasia. Rachels argument the value of self-determination justifies a right to voluntary active euthanasia.Callahan replies competent adults cannot consent to all things. Voluntary active euthanasia involves two parties the killer and the victim (Callahan pg. 626). The physician has to consent to killing the patient and patient has to consent to let the physician kill him.…

    • 1745 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    If the case were that it is an enemy combatant, an argument could be made that they had forfeited their right to life and another could take it. This leaves a nasty taste, is it really permissible to kill soldier after the fighting has ceased, because he tried to kill you in battle? Another exception may be more in line with our conscience, the principle of double effect. The first step in seeing if double effect applies is whether the act itself is good: ending someone’s suffering, check. The next step is to determine if the negative outcome (death of the soldier) is avoidable: the only way to end the suffering is killing them, check.…

    • 2051 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Rationality Research Paper

    • 1550 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Voluntary euthanasia is the intentional termination of a terminally ill patient’s life with the patient’s consent. Most opponents of Euthanasia utilise the DDE to demonstrate the immorality of Voluntary Euthanasia. This is done by ignoring the consent of the patient, and judging the act from the perspective of the physician involved in aiding the patient. Opponents claim that with or without the patient’s/agent’s consent, the physician’s intent is to kill the patient. Since killing another person is inherently wrong , Euthanasia is thus immoral.…

    • 1550 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Pas Vs Euthanasia

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The main discrepancy is that Euthanasia involves the physician intentionally ending the life of his or her patient. These acts are considered a “mercy-killing” with the intent to act as a means of compassion; to end ones suffering. Oppositely, with Euthanasia the patient does not necessarily provide the consent to the third party to perform the “last act”. There are two types of Euthanasia: Voluntary active and Non-voluntary active. Voluntary active euthanasia involves the patient’s explicit request and informed consent for intentional administering of medication or other intervention to cause death.…

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Smriti Kochhar James Rachel in “Active and Passive Euthanasia” tells us the difference between active and passive euthanasia and the role it plays in medical ethics. Being directly involved in the killing of an individual is more socially unacceptable than withholding treatment and watching someone die. However, according to Rachel, both are equally reprehensible. Rachel’s views on active and passive euthanasia are predominantly neutral. He does not defend active euthanasia over passive euthanasia and vice versa.…

    • 1747 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In a world with physician assisted suicide, the doctors are the people doing the killing. This means we are turning men and women into glorified murderers who get payed to kill our loved ones. Death should not be an option, and giving the option to kill legally and “safely” glorifies such acts. The right to die discounts those who do not have the option because they do not meet the proper criteria or their state does not allow it and people who are very sick and don’t believe in this “right.” With the goal of America being equality, eliminating the right to die is the most beneficial way to achieve such equality. This is the only way to return proper conservative values to America rather than allowing the rapid liberalization to continue.…

    • 1098 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Advocates of Physician-assisted suicide propose that mercy killing is required because patients with a terminal illness, undergo unmanageable suffering. They insist that the only way to eradicate pain is to kill the patient. Patients and their physicians assume that those with a condition will be in a better state of not existing than suffering through pain and depression. Instead of killing the patient who is enduring pain, the better alternative is to guarantee that their suffering is controlled. Once the patient’s illness is managed, they will become less despondent, more in control with their thoughts and will be open to alternative…

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    While Active Euthanasia is the other opposite where people tend to argue about, being “wrong” for killing a person. Active Euthanasia, also known as “killing someone” in this case is useful for doctors to do. His claim for both active and passive seem to fall in the same place causing death. People argue the opposite as of how “ The thought is that killing a person is morally worse than letting that person die.” (Rachel, p. 287). According to what people see there’s a difference of…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Pros Of Euthanasia

    • 1534 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Involuntary euthanasia is when the physician is given consent to end someone’s life from an individual other than the patient themselves. This would occur if the patient is incompetent to make the decision on their own. Lastly, passive euthanasia is whenever the doctor prescribes more medication that could potentially be lethal but is not intentional to ending the patient’s life. There is always a risk with this method and others see it as unfair while the physicians are only trying to descend the…

    • 1534 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays