English Legal System: The Differences Between Criminal Law And Civil Law

Improved Essays
In the English Legal System, there are many different areas of law. Usually, the English Legal System separate into two branches, which are civil law and criminal law. Criminal law is a type of public law where the government or the state will take up an action against the accused of crime. Conversely, civil law is a form of private law where the victim will sue a wrong dual who is also a citizen. Therefore, there are differences between criminal law and civil law.
The objective of criminal law are acting as a detergent to prevent someone committing crime and punish the criminal. Besides, it is also made by the judges to protect the society. In contrast, the purpose of civil law is to settle dispute among citizens by providing solutions such as enforcement of a promise or providing compensation. Additionally, the burden of proof in a criminal cases is more difficult to discharge than in a civil case due to the burden of proof in criminal cases must beyond reasonable doubt whereas in civil cases the judges will make civil liability and the burden of proof is on the balance of probability. The English Legal System has a complete court system which can hear cases and resolve a dispute in achieving justice but there are also alternative to the court system.
There are differences
…show more content…
There are two main alternatives to dispute resolution, which are arbitration and tribunals. Arbitration is a procedure whereby parties in dispute refer the issue to a third party, also known as arbitrator, who is independent and neutral for resolution. Tribunals is a body that set up by the government to hear specific cases. Different tribunals will settle different cases. The two major categories of tribunals are administrative tribunal which is created by Acts of Parliament to resolve disputes between citizens and government, domestic tribunals established by private bodies for their own

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Discuss the dual court system in the United States, and the structure of the federal court system, and your home state court system. The structure of the American court system has been viewed as complex and confusing as federal and state courts differ in jurisdiction, and types of cases that can be handled at the many different levels. The Supreme Court is the ultimate decision maker in cases that has been appealed regarding decisions made at the lower level of federal and state Supreme Courts. The dual court system operates within the boundaries of the state and federal court systems.…

    • 384 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Australian Legal System

    • 1683 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Legal systems can be dated back to the ancient peoples. There are many different legal systems that have evolved in other parts of the world. There are two types of legal system, the secular and religious legal system. It is argued that the Australian legal system is radically different to other legal systems. This, however, is not the case through findings and comparison with the Madayin legal system and Talmudic Jewish legal system.…

    • 1683 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Common law is the development of systems and rules to articulate a decision based on precedent, tradition and customs. History has developed, through these techniques, to create an ideology that results in a massive grey area within the words. Laws have and will always be words on a piece of paper, the customs of the laws are unique. These customs, precedents, and traditions have created institutional inequality built into the architecture of law. This relationship is presented by Galanter, Derrick Bell, and Austin Sarat.…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They work with minor civil cases and criminal offences where the maximum sum of compensation is less than $10,000. Courts can issue same types of warrants as Municipal Courts and serve as the coroner, if there is no other medical examiner. Small Claims Courts give only monetary compensations – they can not make person to start or stop doing something. Cases from both types of institutions are appealed by State Intermediate Appellate Courts that have intermediate appellate jurisdiction. Defendants have rights to appeal their convictions, if they have records of the trial and the motion for a new trial was made before the 10th day after judgment.…

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Statute Law In Australia

    • 705 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Australian Legislation is established and administered at three levels, the Commonwealth, the State and the local Government level. Government Institutions or (Parliaments) make laws and all of these institutions, people and laws are all part of the legal system. Common Law or Case Law is referred to as Judge made law, cases are heard, a verdict is reached and then precedence is set. Statute Law is law made by Parliament, written as Acts, Regulations or Rules.…

    • 705 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Federal Court System

    • 1072 Words
    • 5 Pages

    These courts also have the capability to decide an appeal after a Circuit has ruled, either party has the option of choosing to appeal to Supreme Court. However, the Supreme Court is not obligated to heed an appeal, since the Constitution has no requirements for these judges. Parties still have the opportunity to file for certiorari that permits their case to be heard if granted, but if the party’s petition is denied, then the lower court’s opinion…

    • 1072 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sports law is relevant to the administration of sports and a person’s participation in sport whether they play at amateur, professional or international level. The legal issues that arise from a sporting activity can involve aspects of contract law, torts, anti-discrimination, trade practice and criminal law The most common procedure involves breaches of the rules of the game that are contrary to the principles of the game that are seen as being against the morals of sportsmanship. From this point this is able to be dealt with by the governing bodies through possibly being sent to a tribunal and then Governing bodies Most commonly it can be seen that parliament does not make law regarding sports as a result they leave the decision to…

    • 1310 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    While I always knew there was a difference in the types of legal cases such as criminal and civil, I was not aware of Tort law. According to Lau & Johnson (2011). “A tort can be broadly defined as a civil wrong, other than breach of contract” Simply stated, a Tort is some type of civil wrong that causes harm or loss. These law suits are brought for reasons such as personal injury, consumer protection or defamation.…

    • 1051 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Local Court Case Study

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Introduction Whilst observing criminal proceeding in the local, district and supreme courts, the intricate workings of the legal system within Australia became extremely apparent. It became clear during my time in court that the administration, process and practices of each court varied extremely depending on which level you were observing at the time. Similarly during such time spent in court, the distinctions between both summary proceeding and trail upon indictment became clear and could be seen to somewhat mirror McBarnet’s theory of the ‘two tiers of justice’. Within this theory McBarnet argues that, the higher courts are seen as an “arena where the ideology of justice is put on display”.…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The appellate jurisdiction which reviews the cases for errors of the law and then there’s general jurisdiction that has the authority to hear any types of cases. The special jurisdiction courts have the authority to hear only specific types of cases. Personal jurisdiction is the authority of the courts over the parties of a lawsuit and subject matter jurisdiction is the courts power to hear a particular type of case (Bohm, R. & Haley, K., 2013). The federal court system includes the Supreme Court, the federal court of appeals, and the federal district courts.…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essential Criminal Law

    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Criminal thoughts are not penalized by criminal law because it is hard to determine whether or not the person is actually angry, aggravated, annoyed or is actually ready to commit a crime. The harm happens when thoughts are translated into action (Carper, McKinsey, 2008, p. 228). Someone might claim they were hurt or harmed by those words, but there is no proof to determine that. However, proof can be displayed if the individual actually commits the crime. The Government would just gain more power to invade our individual privacy, if they charged people over criminal thoughts.…

    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Brilliant Essays

    Criminal Law Concepts

    • 156 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Work Cited Erickson, Erika. " A Mother's Nightmare: Woman Who Ran over Baby in Accident Shares Story." A Mother's Nightmare: Woman Who Ran over Baby in Accident Shares Story. Fox2, 22 Aug. 2016. Web. 15 Mar. 2017. .…

    • 156 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Brilliant Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Unjust Criminal Trial

    • 66 Words
    • 1 Pages

    For instance, a person who violates the law is charged with a criminal offence. If a person committed a more serious crime, perchance kidnapped a person or robbed a bank, she or he is locked into a prison until a trail is held. The courts determine and regulate what is right and wrong, justice and unjust, and normal and abnormal, to convict those who are guilty.…

    • 66 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Common Law And Islamic Law

    • 1494 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Civil law originated in the Roman Empire and extended to Europe (Glenn200, 119). When the empire declined so did its legal system. In the 11th to 13th centuries Rome revised the European system. The revision gave key legal codes that influenced Europe and other colonized territories (David and Brierley, 1985). Common law came from the British Isles following the military conquest of England from the Normans (Glenn 2000:…

    • 1494 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are not really many similarities and differences between a criminal and civil case. First of all the difference between the two cases in general would be that in a criminal case, the government brings suit against a person who they believe has broken the law. The judge or a jury must consider the evidence presented during a trial to decide whether the accused is guilty or innocent. A crime can occur even if there is no instant victim. In a civil case a person or company asks a judge to settle their problems.…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays