Home Page
Criminal Justice System: The Case Of Miranda Vs. Arizona

Criminal Justice System: The Case Of Miranda Vs. Arizona

Decent Essays

Show More

There area series of policies that we need to follow in order to make an arrest. We need to follow the legal procedures in order to be able to arrest someone and take their freedom away from them. People have the right to just walk away from us if they don’t want to talk to us if they haven’t created a crime. In other words if we just randomly walk up to someone they don’t have to stay and talk to us.

Miranda VS. Arizona was a case that changed the procedures on arresting anyone. Individuals that have been arrested for suspicion on committing a crime, have rights that must be explained to them prior an officer asking them any questions. Those rights are designed for the person being arrested so they wont self incriminate under the 5th

Related Documents

Improved Essays
Supreme Court Case Of Miranda Vs. Arizona 1963
- 1451 Words
- 6 Pages
Supreme Court Case Of Miranda Vs. Arizona 1963

This claim was questioned greatly and first went to the Arizona Supreme court, then proceeded to go to the US Supreme court. The ending decision of this case led to Ernesto Miranda receiving life in prison and the Miranda rights to be put in place in law enforcement. The supreme court case of Miranda vs Arizona is one of the most controversial court cases in American history but it is also one of the most celebrated because of the increase of civil rights for suspected criminals. Ernesto Miranda’s Arizona trial began on June 20th of 1963. Miranda went into the trail with the claim that the police officers who brought him in did not specify that he had the right to stay quiet, even at one point saying that the policemen, Officer Cooley and Young,…
- 1451 Words
- 6 Pages
Improved Essays

Read More
Improved Essays
Samuel Alito's Case Summary
- 757 Words
- 4 Pages
Samuel Alito's Case Summary

The supreme court justices Samuel Alito answered to this case that Mr. Salina didn't have the right to remain silent. Mr. Salina was free to leave, which didn't insert his Miranda rights and he had therefore no right to remain silent. Justices Samuel Alito stated that Mr. Salina´s should have affirmatively invoked his rights, because without Mr. Salina´s having a lawyer or being told the Miranda rights he should have been more affirmative about his invoking. (http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2013/06/salinas_v_texas_right_to_remain_silent_supreme_court_right_to_remain_silent.html) Salinas v. Texas is demonstrating the Miranda rules in a way where if the rules doesn´t apply the questioned from the beginning the Miranda rights doesn't apply either.…
- 757 Words
- 4 Pages
Improved Essays

Read More
Improved Essays
Supreme Court Case: Lisenba Vs. New York
- 396 Words
- 2 Pages
Supreme Court Case: Lisenba Vs. New York

Since Miranda v. Arizona (1956) the Supreme Court watered down the protection of suspects during interrogation in several ways. The Miranda warnings weakened when courts decided they were not Fifth Amendment rights (Hemmens, 2014). Miranda warnings weakened when Courts ruled that police violations are inadmissible and does not apply to evidence obtained through Miranda violated interrogations. In addition, the courts ruled that not all parts of the Miranda warnings need to be read to suspects. One of the most damaging Miranda warnings were weakened when courts decided that if a confession was made through an interrogation that violated Miranda rules, the confession is admissible once the suspect Miranda rights were properly read (Hemmens, 2014, p. 28).…
- 396 Words
- 2 Pages
Improved Essays

Read More
Improved Essays
Miranda Vs Arizona Research Paper
- 484 Words
- 2 Pages
Miranda Vs Arizona Research Paper

Imagine being arrested based on zero evidence to accuse you of a crime and at the very same time being forced to answer intimidating questions that could be used against you. Miranda v. Arizona is an iconic court case that created a large impact on racial discrimination and even how arrests would be made. It started in 1963 when Ernesto Miranda was arrested in Phoenix, Arizona. He was in custody for rape, kidnapping, and robbery. Ernesto Miranda appealed with the Arizona Supreme Court claiming that the police had unconstitutionally received his confessions.…
- 484 Words
- 2 Pages
Improved Essays

Read More
Superior Essays
Miranda Vs Arizona Essay
- 950 Words
- 4 Pages
Miranda Vs Arizona Essay

Miranda vs. Arizona is one of the most crucial U.S. Supreme Court cases ever held in the United States. The case causes the Supreme Court to redefine law enforcement procedures before interrogations. The decision that was reached by the Supreme Court addressed four different cases involving custodial interrogations. All of these cases are similar in the fact that there was a custodial interrogation where the suspect was not properly informed of his constitutional rights to remain silent and have a presence of an attorney. Additionally, in all of the cases besides Stewart v. California, the conviction was affirmed without any belief that there was a violation of constitutional rights ("Facts and Case").…
- 950 Words
- 4 Pages
Superior Essays

Read More
Improved Essays
Fare V. Arizona 1979
- 662 Words
- 3 Pages
Fare V. Arizona 1979

In the case of Fare v. Michael C. (1979), the United States Supreme Court rejected the California Supreme Court’s position that a juvenile's request to see his probation officer constitutes an invocation of the right to remain silent within the context of Miranda v. Arizona (1966). Sixteen year old Michael C. was taken into custody by the Van Nuys, California police department on suspicion of murder. After being advised of his Maranda rights, and acknowledging he understood them, he was asked if he wanted an attorney. His response was, “Can I have my probation officer here?” (Page 442 U. S. 710).…
- 662 Words
- 3 Pages
Improved Essays

Read More
Improved Essays
Public Safety Exception Case Study
- 572 Words
- 3 Pages
Public Safety Exception Case Study

Under the public safety exception, where officers engage in a custodial interrogation before Miranda warnings, and if reasonably prompted by a concern for the public safety or the safety of the arresting officers, a suspect’s statements are admissible as evidence. (New York v. Quarles (1984) 476 U.S. 656 (holding that the need for answers to questions in a situation posing a threat to the public safety outweighs the need for the prophylactic rule protecting the Fifth Amendment’s privilege against self-incrimination).) In essence, an officer must have a reasonable need to protect the public or themselves from immediate danger. Id. Moreover, the applicability of the public safety exception is not dependent upon the subjective motivation of the questioning officer.…
- 572 Words
- 3 Pages
Improved Essays

Read More
Improved Essays
Supreme Court Dbq Analysis
- 832 Words
- 4 Pages
Supreme Court Dbq Analysis

Arizona (1966). This decision, generally speaking, defined the rights of the accused after an appeal was made on behalf of Ernesto Miranda. It said, among other things, that each person accused of a crime has the right to remain silent and the right to an attorney (Document 7). The tradition of these Miranda rights has become common knowledge in American society, despite the fact that some people believe that they are generally too lenient and often hamper the justice system’s ability to convict guilty criminals of their crimes (Documents 5a & 5b). The Supreme Court has failed to see adequate need for reversal of this decision, despite the dramatic odds that lie in favour of the accused as a result of the decision, and the fact that the victim is often left without help when the offender is not convicted.…
- 832 Words
- 4 Pages
Improved Essays

Read More
Improved Essays
Miranda Rights Dbq Analysis
- 799 Words
- 4 Pages
Miranda Rights Dbq Analysis

The Miranda warning that arose from the U.S. Supreme Court's Miranda v. Arizona decision assures that officers assure that those arrested are aware of their rights that protect against self-incrimination prior to any questioning. The ruling in Miranda does fulfill the legal tradition of the promise against self-incrimination and protects against the pressures of authority. The Miranda rights fulfills the legal tradition of the promise against self-incrimination because they protect against wrongful punishment and torture employed by authorities. Authorities can abuse their power in order to gain info or prove their suspicions correct.…
- 799 Words
- 4 Pages
Improved Essays

Read More
Improved Essays
Fifth Amendment: The Miranda Warning
- 271 Words
- 2 Pages
Fifth Amendment: The Miranda Warning

The Miranda Warning is designed to inform anyone in police custody the right to due process by adhering to the Fifth Amendment. Certain protocols and formality must be followed by implementing four things before conducting an interrogation. The defendant must first be informed that they have the right to remain silent (Hall, 2015). Secondly, they must be informed that anything they say can and will be used against them in a court of law (Hall, 2015). They should also be informed that they have a right to receive legal advice (Hall, 2015).…
- 271 Words
- 2 Pages
Improved Essays

Read More
Decent Essays
Miranda Rights: The Fifth Amendment To The United States
- 491 Words
- 2 Pages
Miranda Rights: The Fifth Amendment To The United States

What do you think about the miranda rights.these miranda rights can also be called the miranda warning. Weah do you think it is important that cops read you your miranda rights. Another good question is what would happen if i did not read you your miranda rights, well if a cop doesn’t read your miranda rights then some people think they can escape punishment. the reason cops read you your miranda rights is if you're in trouble you might want to know what you can do to help your case. However A Cop still has to infer these to you.…
- 491 Words
- 2 Pages
Decent Essays

Read More
Improved Essays
Fourth Amendment In Texas
- 492 Words
- 2 Pages
Fourth Amendment In Texas

As well the court also stated that detaining a person to require him to identify himself with lack of evidence against him/her violates their Fourth Amendment right. The Fourth Amendment requires such action,or that the seizure should be carried out pursuant to plan embodying explicit,neutral limitations of individual officers. In other words, a police officer can’t arrest you,detain you,or search you without a search warrant or an arrest warnat. Though there are some expectations on getting search or being detained,like for instances if a police officer asks your permission to search in your belongings and you agree then that’s not considered an intrusion of your privacy because you allowed him/her to search in your belongings. Same goes for being arrested because in order to be charged with a crime police officers must have reasonable suspicion and enough evidence to charge you with that crime.…
- 492 Words
- 2 Pages
Improved Essays

Read More
Superior Essays
Miranda Vs Arizona Research Paper
- 1106 Words
- 5 Pages
Miranda Vs Arizona Research Paper

In March 13th, 1963 the court case began with the arrest of a Phoenix resident named Ernesto Miranda. During this arrest, Miranda was not informed of his rights during the arrest. At the police station, he was identified by the witness. The police then took him to interrogation and was then questioned by two police officers. Two hours later, the officers obtained a written confession signed by Miranda.…
- 1106 Words
- 5 Pages
Superior Essays

Read More
Superior Essays
Judicial Summary: Miranda V. Arizona
- 1238 Words
- 5 Pages
Judicial Summary: Miranda V. Arizona

Arizona can also be put into the frame of judicial activism. The Supreme Court created a new law, bypassing the elected legislative branch of government, in order to protect the rights of the accused. The law that requires police to read the defendant the “Miranda Rights” not only helps to protect the defendant from self-incrimination under duress, but it also reduces police violence and other forms of intimidation that could lead to a false confession. The new law protects the rights of the accused and changes the behavior of the police towards arrests and interrogations, reconciling growing police powers with individual basic…
- 1238 Words
- 5 Pages
Superior Essays

Read More
Improved Essays
Criminal Justice Process Analysis
- 1883 Words
- 8 Pages
Criminal Justice Process Analysis

The police question suspects and witnesses for two reasons, to gather information about the crime and to try to get a suspect to confess if they believe the individual is guilty. This is where Miranda rights are important. The Constitution guarantees certain rights including the following. The right to remain silent and the right to have an attorney, either one that is appointed by the state or one that is privately hired. To start with the first line of the Miranda statement “You have the right to remain silent”.…
- 1883 Words
- 8 Pages
Improved Essays

Read More

Related Topics