Malingering Case Study

Superior Essays
Malingering

Determining if a criminal defendant is malingering or denying a psychiatric disorder is one element of all forensic psychological evaluation. According to the DSM-IV malingering is defined as intentionally faking either physical or psychological symptoms, for external gains included but not limited to, workman 's comp, financial compensation, avoid criminal prosecution and to avoid work or military duty. Faking psychiatric disorders, physical injury, and cognitive impairment are some of the few ways individuals can malinger. On the other hand individuals may deny having any type of cognitive impairment to avoid being civilly committed in the psychiatric hospital.
It is imperative that forensic psychologist determine whether a defendant is malingering or denying a psychiatric disorder. This determination ultimately would prove or disprove culpability of the accused defendant and confine these defendants in the appropriate place. Often times defendants fake a mental illness to receive a lesser sentences or avoid going to jail/prison. In other circumstances defendants deny psychiatric disorders because they are unaware of their metal illness. To avoid placing individuals in the wrong place defendants who are thought to be incompetent to stand trial undergo a series of test to determine psychiatric disorders or malingering.
…show more content…
Paradis et al, 2013). There was also a link between the RFT performance and IQ score and mini-mental state examination (MMSE; folstein, Folstein & McHugh, 1795). Those who tested poorly on the IQ test also had low MMSE scores. In based on the findings in this research it is more likely for defendant who test poorly on both the IQ exam and the mini-mental state exam to also not preform well in other test such as the Rey 15-item test and TOMM

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    If trials actually did this, competency evaluations would be superfluous. Since society is not preparing to avenge the crime, there would be nothing egregiously unfair about going straight to trial. In reality, Tortorici’s trial was a moral one. Although the prosecution acknowledged Tortorici’s overt mental illness, they emphasized that the jurors must consider whether he was legally insane, arguing that: “The issue is not whether Ralph Tortorici is crazy, insane ……

    • 143 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the “State of Oregon v. Kipland Philip Kinkel,” the defendant is appealing his sentence of 111 years and eight months. The defendant was charged and pled guilty to four counts of murder and twenty-six attempted counts of murder, in 1998. During the sentence hearing, the defendant claimed that his actions were caused by a mental disease, and that this…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lunde works to make sure that the image he presents of the world of forensics is as realistic as possible; alerting the reader of any differences in definitions from the diction of everyday life that they may not know about. In one of the various examples, Dr. Lunde provides the reader with this, “I had no doubt he was suffering from a mental illness at the time, namely, Major Clinical Depression. But the definition of insanity (written in 1843) requires a mental illness of the sort that prevents a person from knowing what they are doing and knowing right from wrong” (123). This demonstrates the way in which lawyers and such have to examine a person’s sanity. Insanity in diction of current times is commonly defined as a crazed or ridiculous person and it is used in a very casual manner, often jokingly.…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    General Difference Between Successful and Unsuccessful Mental Disorder Defense Despite many characteristics mentioned in the above, the fact that most individuals found NCRMD have had previous contact with the psychiatric system or history records with the criminal justice system are very interesting to acknowledge. When compared with individuals with successful the NCRMD defense and unsuccessful NCRMD defense, individuals with NCRMD found more involvement with the psychiatric previously(Gullets, 2016). It suggests that the offenders who have been diagnosed with a mental disorder in the past have more possibility of successful NCRMD defense compared to others with no previous records with the psychiatrist. In another words, the previous records…

    • 1688 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to the video, competency to stand trail consist of two parts which the accused has the ability to have a factual and rational understanding of the charges against them and also ability to work with an attorney on creating a defense case. When figuring out the stage of competency, mental illnesses can be discovered during the procedure. Mental illnesses like schizophrenia, mental retardation or brain damage associated with the defendant leads to the incompetency to stand trial. Which shows the defendant lacks the ability to stand trial at the time. Whenever the defendant receives help then the judge can make sure they are ok to continue the case.…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The law is aware of instances such as this and has created a plea of Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity (NGRI). In receiving this verdict, the individual will be sent to a mental health facility to be treated for their mental illness instead of being sent to prison and being punished for the criminal act. The symptoms of…

    • 1053 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Therefore the accused was unable to differentiate between right and wrong during the prohibited conduct and make a rational decision because of her mental disorder. As a result, Anastasia would have to prove on the balance of…

    • 1691 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The purpose of a forensic psychologist is to accumulate information concerning the defendant by the means of assessment and results, interviews, as well as information from third parties. The material is presented to members of the court (e.g. judge, attorneys, and jury members) to assist with selecting the appropriate punishment (Heilburn et al, 2003). Forensic psychologist provided expert testimony specializing in mental health diagnosis as it relates to legal proceedings meeting the Daubert standard (e.g. has the assessment been peer reviewed, the reliability and validity of the assessment, just to name a few (Heilburn et al, 2003; Hugaboom,…

    • 1050 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    That’s not important in the jury room (Grishman 107)”. The insanity plea is used for a wide variety of cases. Part of the outcome is that the accused convicts of the cases believed that they were legally insane while committing the crime. Furthermore, a majority of the insanity pleas is rejected which makes it extremely rare to follow through. Through such cases, the insanity plea is commonly used as an excuse to prevent themselves from going to prison.…

    • 1270 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This verdict can often be mistaken for the defence of diminished responsibility / capacity despite there being many major differences between the two. Although both are there to be used by mentally ill defendants, reason of insanity is a full defense to a crime and diminished responsibility / capacity is not. Pleading not guilty by reason of insanity is essentially equivalent to pleading not guilty, diminished responsibility / capacity is however just the defendant pleading to a lesser crime, the fact they are mentally ill is used as a mitigating factor. The law presumes that every person has free will, is responsible for their actions and should therefore be punished in accordance with the seriousness of their crime.…

    • 1250 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Cesare Beccaria and Jeremy Bentham were the founders of the classical theory phenomenon (Piliavin, 1986). The concept was based on several principles, which entailed three main ideologies; free will, where actions are based on one’s own rationality (Burke 2014), more so punishment should apply to the crime as opposed to the criminal, as the theorists believed that a certainty in punishment would deter both the public and criminal (Akers 1999). The perspective adopted throughout will focus on the theories inability to justify the actions of violent homicide offenders, such as Jeffrey Dahmer, and how the high recidivism rates fail to support specific deterrence, even when making the punishment fit the crime. Free will assumes that all individuals…

    • 1622 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Insanity Defense Papers

    • 1361 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Therefore, they could not have criminal intent, a pre-planned notion to carry out the crime. If this can be successfully proved, then a defendant would be found not guilty by reason of insanity (D. Emer, PowerPoint presentation, October, 19 2016). Next, per Morse and Richard, “…fundamental fairness and the due process clause require an insanity defense” (Morse, Richard, 490). Morse and Richard are saying that without this defense, those individuals suffering from a mental illness would not receive fair treatment in the legal system.…

    • 1361 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Their proof must show that the accused has criminal liability, accountability, or culpability (Pg. 255). In the absence of one or both of the attributes the insanity may be used. To begin with, as stated by Torry and Billick, the insanity defense was used as far back as 1581 when there was a legal note in place for those who could distinguish the difference between right and wrong and those who could not (Pg. 256). By the Eighteenth Century the insanity defense was distinguished by, if the accused could only understand the ramifications of what he had done like an infant or even a wild animal would, then he would not be held responsible for said crime. Today, however, the law uses several different rules, including the M’Naghten rule, to determine if person’s mental state during the act of committing the crime was such that he will use the insanity defense.…

    • 1542 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Our current legal systems leads to wrongful conviction, which is a terrible injustice. The legal system does not come to the knowledge of many until a innocent person spends years in prison. There is a rising number of exonerations due to DNA. However, the growth of exonerations is causing more awareness about injustices in our legal system. In many minds there is rise of doubts now about the accuracy of the criminal justice system.…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The amount of individual that go through the criminal justice system that have a mental illness has become a growing issue in the criminal justice system. Many individual that enter the criminal justice system are bound to end up in prison, where they have little access to mental health help. The amount of individual that enter the criminal justice system that have a serious mental illness is estimated to be 16.9 percent. These individuals are usually repeat offenders that circulate through the system because they do not receive the treatment that they need. (Almquist & Dodd, 2009).…

    • 1185 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays

Related Topics