Criminal Contempt Case Study

Improved Essays
Criminal Contempt is defined as a disobedient or open disrespect for the court. It punishes conduct that violates a courts rule rather than a penal statue or some criminal law.
Arthur Kirkland was charged with criminal contempt because he punched Judge Fleming. This incident happened when Arthur was in Judge Fleming court room arguing Jeff McCullaugh case a client of Arthur. Jeff was stop for a broken light and then mistaken for another man that had his same name. McCullaugh had already spent 1 ½ years in jail and Arthur wanted to prove his innocence but Judge Fleming didn’t allowed Arthur to show him the evidence and refused to see it because it was two days late. Arthur was mad because thanks to Fleming an innocent man was going to stay
…show more content…
Garner and Graham v. Conner was a different story. In the case of Tennessee v. Garner police officers were wrong in using deadly force. The suspect had no weapons on him, the suspect was a suspected felon meaning that he might have not been the suspect at all, the victim ignore the police officer order and continue to climb the wall to scape. The officer shot him and killed him. I believe that the police officer could of have use his Taser gun and gave him an electric charged to get him down, apprehend him and then interrogate him reading the crime. Instead he decided to shot and killed him knowingly knowing that he had no weapons. This was very unconstitutional of that police officer in doing so because deadly force should only be use when there is a threat to the community and in this case there was none. Graham v. Conner was another case in which deadly force was use unconstitutionally and wrongly. The petitioner Graham was diabetic and he asked a friend to drive him to a store so that he could get some orange juice for his diabetes and because he can in and out so quick of the store the officer thought that he was suspicious. He handcuffs him, the officer failed to treat Graham conditions. Instead he had multiple injuries and then the officer learned that nothing had happened in the store. Not only did the officer acted wrong, he violated Graham rights and assume that he had committed a crime when he had no real evidence. There was no search …show more content…
In his 5th his due process right when it comes to a jury trial. In the movie it was only the judge and defense attorney and the other side there were no jury for his defendant to fight his case. In his 8th the judge was harsh when he sentences him to prison/jail without parole and permission of bail. This was cruel and unusual punishment from Judge Fleming and this was not correct because being a judge should be more than just sentencing a person without having to hear a good fighting argument from both sides and this was something that Robert didn’t have and he was just sentence to prison for it.

The meaning of life in judge Rayford words was when he went skydiving and his parachute didn’t open and fell on a tree top that’s when he discovered the meaning of life and he said that it sucks.
The half way point is a little game that Judge Rayford plays each time he goes out flying, and the way he does this is by calculating how much fuel he has left and flying a little further than what he can’t and he calls this a little beyond the half way point and still getting back to where he started with the amount of fuel that he has

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The officer was trying to figure out if it is the combination of the facts and his understanding of the relevant law. In this case, the officer probably reasonably mistaken and this could be because of lack knowledge of the officer about the state law. There is no reason, under the text of the Fourth Amendment or our precedents, why this same result should be acceptable when reached by way of a reasonable mistake of fact, but not when reached by way of a similarly reasonable mistake of law (Washington Post, Par.…

    • 858 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Adams County Bail Bonds is here to answer your call anytime of the day or night. We service the Adams County area, which is close to Denver. We realize that many of our clients are in a desperate situation and require fast assistance. We are here to provide immediate assistance to you, if you are within our area. Don't hesitate to pick up the telephone and give us a call.…

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    People V. Ulysis Parriss

    • 1291 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The frisk was legal because the cop had reason to believe the defendant had a weapon. But once the cop saw that the defendant was unarmed the search should have stopped. By not doing so and continuing the cop violated the defendant’s fourth amendment rights. He did not have probable cause which is needed to do a full search. The case was dismissed due to the evidence being suppressed because of…

    • 1291 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to CNN On July 10th in Texas, Sandra Bland was puled over for failure to us a turn signal. The trooper issued a warning but before he let her go he asked Bland why she was mad. He then ordered Bland to put out her cigarette and step out of her car. She then refuses to comply with the trooper. The trooper then draws his Taser.…

    • 1096 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    William Heffernan faced a few moral dilemmas when he was working as assistant to the District Attorney. One in particular was when he was faced with a moral challenge in the case of a defendant Heffernan presumed to be guilty, but had been denied a fair trial by jury. Heffernan was confronted with the decision of whether or not to challenge an appeal made by the defense so the defendant could have a fair trial by jury. But with a new trial, the defendant stood a chance of winning his trial since the previous witnesses were out of the country. Then a presumed murderer would be free on the streets.…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    I choose to do my research paper on one of my favorite court cases in American history Miranda vs. Arizona case. I’m choosing this court case because it brings up two amendments that tend to be overlooked by law enforcement comes around and one of the most well-known sayings. First I will be giving a quick background about those two amendments and then I will start talking about the case. The issues about this case involved the fifth and sixth amendment. Let me explain both of these amendments.…

    • 1860 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Juvenile Court Case Study

    • 1656 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Adolescence are in a unique time in their lives. They have characteristics of children and characteristics of adults. So, when evaluating whether or not an adolescent should remain in juvenile court or move to adult court, it can be a very difficult decision. Look at adolescents and crime, we know that adolescents are still developing. They have weaker impulse control and are less likely to think ahead than adults.…

    • 1656 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A Response to Question 1, Section 1: The Meaning of Life: Wolf vs. Taylor Both Richard Taylor and Susan Wolf understand the difficulty of answering the question, “What is the meaning of life?” Taylor begins his “The Meaning of Life” by saying that we do not even understand what the question means to then answer it, and Wolf claims in her own “The Meanings of Lives” that the question is embarrassing to ask because, as Taylor asserts, we really do not understand what is being asked here. Taylor proposes, then, the best way to answer this is to ask what makes for a meaningless life, and perhaps from this comparison, we can find some answers to the original question. Wolf appreciates Taylor’s approach as she also adopts his method, and even though…

    • 917 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although the goal is to use little force when arresting suspects, that is not always possible. One of the rules of engagement is that if the suspect is a known or suspected armed felon, and could cause bodily injury or death to the officer or bystanders, the officer has the right to use deadly force. For example, in the Michael Brown case in Ferguson, Missouri, Brown was shot by police officer Darren Wilson after an altercation ensued over control of Wilson’s gun after Wilson stopped Brown and his friend Dorian Johnson because they matched the descriptions of robbers in the area. Brown and Johnson then fled after Wilson’s gun went off and Wilson chased them. Brown then turned around and charged at Wilson; Wilson fearing for his safety fired his gun at Brown, shooting him multiple times until Brown was no longer a threat.…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is a contempt of court that is committed outside of the court where a person refuses to accept a summons. Constructive contempt is a contempt of court committed, not in the presence of the court, but away from it. Generally, constructive…

    • 254 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This was racially motivated. As you can see from the statement above by the civil jury favoring in the officer instead of Oscar Grant III. Even the video wasn 't enough to show that Oscar was an innocent man on the ground not doing anything. African-Americans are being shot for no reason. The Supreme Court stated, “…racial bias in sentencing, even if shown through credible statistical evidence, could not be challenged under the Fourteenth Amendment in the absence of conscious, discriminatory intent” (Alexander p.126).…

    • 1811 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Superior Court Case Study

    • 917 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Serena Pang Professor Karl A. Boedecker BUS 301 April 6, 2017 I. Court(s) visited: San Francisco Criminal Divisions of the Superior Court, which is located in 850 Bryant Street, San Francisco. II. Day(s) and Time(s) Thursday, March 23, 2017 at 1:30 p.m. III. Judge: I could not hear the name of the Judge.…

    • 917 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Department of Justice, June 2002. Print. In the 1985, the U.S. Supreme Court made a decision on the case of Tennessee v. Garner, (471 U.S. 1). The restrictions on the use of deadly force by police were for the first time established as a precedent of law. The ruling was that there should be use of deadly force not unless it is indispensable to avert the escape and the police officer on duty is inclined to believing that the suspect is a potential threat and may cause serious physical injury to other innocent persons or the officer.…

    • 1467 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Eric Garner Case Study

    • 1005 Words
    • 4 Pages

    To begin with, the case I decided to write about is the Eric Garner case which I feel strongly about. This incident took place in Staten Island, New York on July 17th 2014. It all started when the police officers approached Mr. Garner about selling untaxed cigarettes and tried making an arrest. Eric Garner then tried to explain to the law enforcement officers that he hasn’t done anything. As the officer tried to make an arrest with resistance from the victim, he then wrapped his arm around the 43 year old’s neck.…

    • 1005 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Since the beginning of time we ask the question, what is the meaning of life? There is no right or wrong answer to that question. We have used logic and reasoning to explain why and how things happen. The wish to understand that question is always present in our minds.…

    • 952 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays