Components Of Crime Control And The Due Process Model Analysis

Good Essays
Introduction

On the Wednesday the 5th of August 2015, I attended the Brisbane District Court for approximately 3 hours. This essay outlines on the observations that where made that day and critically reviews the components of crime control and the due process models, which these findings represent. I will then go on to draw upon my observations guided by academic literature, which will provide an overview of both models. This essay however will dispute that the governing model for what I observed on the 5th of August at the courts was both the due process and crime control models of the criminal justice system.

The Observed Court Hearings

On Wednesday the 5th of August 2015, I attended the Brisbane District Court, in which I
…show more content…
It has been found that these models are used in difference sectors of the CJS, these being that it can be assumed that police and governing bodies tend to use crime control model, where as courts tend to lean towards the due process model. (Daley et al, 2006). The courts tend to use the due process model as it has less faith in the reliability and actions carried out in the early stages of the criminal process and puts greater reliance on formal fact finding as well as an empathise on the rights of the individual and their presumption of innocence. This model also is concerned with the power of the state illegally depriving its citizens of their rights and believes in examining the state powers. Where as the crime control model on the other hand is mainly focused on public order and has faith in the early crime control actors, such as police. This also differs from the due process model as it also assumes that persons in power, practise their discretion by using the law to guide their actions with a degree of inaccuracy, which is acceptable. (Marmo et al, …show more content…
This trial predominantly focused on the faith of early prosecutors, as the trial was mainly based around police evidence that was gathered by a team from the Queensland Crime Commission. The importance of having faith in early prosecutors such as police is that they are key enforcers of public order, and without their presence citizens wouldn’t be able to experience their liberty. They are also key stakeholders in controlling crime within society, as they are able to apprehend and convict those who break the law. The police also use their presence in society to suppress crime and overall represent the power of the state .The police are also seen a persons within society who are meant to uphold the law, therefore should be trusted in the crime control model of the criminal justice system (Marmo et al, 2012). This trust is also seen in the courts as police are usually are called upon to supply evidence. This was viewed in the second trial, when police where called upon to show evidence that a defendant was at a certain location where an illegal event occurred. The evidence the police supplied to support their testimony where time, logs from the event as well as pictures, video, as well as there own eyewitness accounts. This was then cross examined by the defence for a short period of time. However there statements provided

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Prenzler (2013) claims that “Government that operate police departments and set the general direction for policing strategies need to be fairly elected and consultative, so that the policing policy framework is representative and balances community concerns wherever possible” (p. 60). The second point was police remain in the subject of law. For example, if police officer commit breaches of administrative or regulator law, they should be charged and punished when found guilty. Furthermore, if there was evidences that police have committed criminal offences they should be charged the same as any citizen. Another important aspect of the legal accountability of police is judicial examination in the courts.…

    • 1110 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    On Friday the 7th of August, I attended the Roma Street District and Supreme Court. I attended court for just over three hours and observed three various criminal cases. This essay will detail the proceedings of these cases and analyse them in terms of which model, due process or crime control, the cases presented as. Using the academic literature available I will detail the cases and how they were conducted as well as a brief over view of both models reflected. After reviewing these cases alongside the scholarly sources I have decided that both crime control and due process methods were present at the time of my observations.…

    • 1542 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The crime control model tends to focus on the conviction and punishment of criminals; while the due process model takes a more liberal approach and focuses on the protection of the individual and their rights. The criminal justice system currently and should use aspects of each model so that things are kept effective and efficient so that the system treats both the victim and the defendant fairly. If the criminal justice system focused predominantly on the crime control model it may allow for police technologies to be implemented which by themselves might cause less crime but can also create concrete evidence to…

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This independence shows elements of separation of powers and the importance of impartiality. The courts are the only power able to overrule decisions relating to police complaints , which supports the separation and independence from the other branches of government. The main issue relating to the police or any public authority is possible corruption. Corruption can be evident through political pressure, which could be imposed upon police officers . However, the emphasis of independence is to counteract this, and thereby to gain more confidence from the public.…

    • 1624 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Overall, police brutality is thought to be a cause of an unjust system, the police mentality and how police react under pressure. An unjust system would include unfair trial, or the law protecting the law. “Her anger is reserved for a system that allows law enforcement agencies to investigate their own” (Susman). This demonstrates an unjust system because if police investigate police, it is easier to…

    • 1179 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Crime Control Model

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The crime model heavily relies on the ability of investigative and prosecutorial officers, they might use their distinctive skills to elicit and reconstruct a tolerably accurate account of alleged criminal event that took place. The due process model emphasizes on a view of formal and adjudicative fact-finding process with stressing the possibility of errors. People, such as police, witness and prosecutorial officers, tend to be emotionally aroused in the context with notoriously poor observers of disturbing events so as to damage defendants’ rights. As a result, the further scrutiny to largely avoid the possibilities of human errors is very necessary or at least must be available. However, how far the following scrutiny mechanisms for overlooked and suppressed cases must be available is a controversial topic for the…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    One main reasons for these types of models in our country today is to deter crime, protect the citizens from wrongdoers, and receive justice. When addressing both the crime control model and the due process model they have these things in common with one another. The crime control model is used to help deter crime. However, the punishments for criminals within this process are much more severe. The crime control model was created in order apprehend and convict.…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    There is the consensus perspective which believes criminal law comes from the needs of society to stop and deter unwanted and harmful behavior. The consensus perspective also sees the police as peace keepers and protectors of society. The other perspective the critical perspective, this is the idea that the law and its officers should protect the interests of the powerful, that police are seen as ways to control the public. These two perspectives are both possible but in my opinion that consensus perspective seems more socially acceptable, if people were to believe that the law and police officers were influenced by the powerful and wealthy then it would cause unrest in today’s society. Although it could be possible that the critical perspective is right it is more likely that it was the consensus perspective that criminal law and police action originated from.…

    • 2354 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    However, if he or she pleads not guilty then they go to trial to prove their case. England’s criminal justice system has many differences when compared to the United States. The Ministry of Justice oversees different parts of England’s criminal justice system. The courts, prisons, probation are the areas that they are in control over. Their main goal is to work with the public and reduce reoffending.…

    • 1580 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Due Process Model

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The due process model tries to protect suspects from errors and the abuses that can occur in the system, seeing the criminal justice system having many errors that could occur as suspects are arrested and sentenced. What is community policing? Community policing is the assigning of the same group of policemen to a particular area so that they become familiar with the residents…

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays