Creek's Manifest Destiny

Improved Essays
The Creek Indians were a powerful and bold group of individuals that united to protect themselves from larger groups of Indians in the Southern region of America. Creek established towns could be found throughout Alabama, Florida, Georgia, and South Carolina in woodland areas along winding creeks or rivers. As the Creeks settled in different areas, they took their culture with them. Their town square was used for many events: festivals, dances, rituals and even council meetings when the weather was permitting. One of the traditional festivals that the Creek held was the Green Corn Festival. During this festival, the religious gathering of the tribe members was to give thanks to the spirits for a great harvest and the weather. The nomadic tendencies …show more content…
With the Manifest Destiny attitude, Americans had a new sense of pride because of their recent separation from Europe. As the American’s self-pride grew, they began to want more land; the more land a country has, the more power the country has. As Americans grew greedy, the Creeks became targets in the “American take over” for land. Creek settlements were on the land that Americans wanted, and since the Americans wanted them gone, they forcefully removed the Creeks and other Indians. When the Americans forced them to leave the Indians relocated in Oklahoma where they began to start a new town and began to do the same as they did in Alabama, Florida, and Georgia. Once the Creeks were settled in Oklahoma the U.S. Army forced them to leave again. “The U.S. Army enforced the removal of more than 20,000 Muscogee (Creeks) to Indian territory in 1836 and 37” (Creek History). When the Americans removed the Indians from the land they wanted; at first the Indians had lost some power but as the years went on they began to grow because they were spread out all across America. The Creek Indians continued to have the same culture. They would get a town a certain size and then split in half to go build another town and would do the same process again and again. The Creeks had a democratic government and elected a chief. The chief that was elected would serve for a lifetime unless recalled. Each town that …show more content…
The Americans and the Indians did not want any trouble between the two groups. Angie Debo said in The Road to Disappearance "To other Indians the Creeks offered war or friendship with proud indifference”. The Creeks did not want any trouble but they were not afraid to have trouble. The Americans chose to be allies with some of the Creeks and the Creeks taught them how to grow crops and when to grow them. The Indians taught Americans new fighting techniques such as hiding and being tricky. Many Creek women married to British men and taught them the language and the cultures of Indians. The Creek women understood both the Indians and white ways and because of this if there were children many of them became Chiefs or great leaders for either a tribe or the whites. Alexander McGillivray was the son of a French and Creek woman and son of a Scottish man. Alexander was a chief and fought for many years to be allies with the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    THESIS: Tongan and Iroquois political and social organization were different in several ways. Tongan political organization was by chiefdom, and social structure was through rank stratification divided by genealogical relationships of the primarily patrilineal line. The Iroquois’ political system was by tribe, and the societal organization was egalitarian with clans as matrilineal. Both are similar because of the heavy impact of European culture on both societies. European influence changed the gender roles, political structure, and the social hierarchy of each group.…

    • 1280 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For a time, Kaycee Pilgreen was the leader of the Karankawas but it was only a female, because the males were always busy hunting and gathering food or just generally trying to make life for the tribe…

    • 1380 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Q1: The Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo was settled in 1848 between the U.S and Mexico, where Mexican citizens and their property living in California, New Mexico and Texas were to be incorporated into the U.S. During the signing of the treaty, General Santa Anna proposed that there would be a buffer zone separating both counties. Initially, General Santa Anna hoped that this new buffer zone would help in defending attacks in the frontier. Mexican citizens were given the option to stay in the United States and gain citizenship or to go back to Mexico and remain a Mexican citizen.…

    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The strongest members of the tribe had departed days before on what seemed like another hopeless attempt to hunt; an attempt to survive. Conditions had been very difficult for the Cheyenne and Arapaho tribes, but their fearless leaders worked frivolously to attain peace with the white troops and settlers and meet the needs of their people. On the morning of November 29, 1864 women, children, and the elderly tribe members awoke to a horrific situation that would come to be known as the Sand Creek Massacre. Despite the Cheyenne and Arapaho tribes ongoing effort to maintain peace and sustain their way of life, they suffered greatly at the hands of the US troops who throughout history have been thought to have heroically conquered and claimed the Wild West.…

    • 1404 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Dbq Territorial Expansion

    • 1109 Words
    • 5 Pages

    It’s stated that the US government, “Responding to the clamoring of whites in Mississippi, Georgia and Florida, they uprooted the so-called five “Civilized Tribes” of the south, Choctaws, Creeks, Chickasaws, Seminoles and Cherokees and moved them to western Oklahoma.” (Davis 49). Just a mere example of what the US was willing to do out of its own economic interests, the relocation of these tribes benefitted them because it allowed them to close conflicts in the south and get a better grip of control over them as US expands westward. The ability to move Natives was complemented by the attainment of land from the Louisiana Purchase. This territory gained from France was a major development in the movement across the central soon to be United States.…

    • 1109 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Rainsford is not a hero because he gained hatred towards Zaroff as the game went on and he kills innocents without guilt. In the short story, The Most Dangerous Game Rainsford keeps a grudge towards Zaroff even after the game ended. Even though Rainsford won the game “[he] did not smile ‘I am still a beast at bay’ he said in a low hoarse voice ‘Get ready General Zaroff.’” Rainsford still possessed hatred towards Zaroff and the only way he was going to let out the anger was by killing Zaroff. Rainsford gained his anger as the game moved on.…

    • 165 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    When Americans first arrived on the East Coast, the Natives helped them survive in the land. But the Americans kept pushing for more territory, causing some Natives to fight to protect their land. Then as the War of 1812 rolls by, the British begin to arm the Natives, encouraging them to rebel. But with the British backing away from the states after the war, the Natives lost some fighting power. The Americans still pushed and pushed for more land, especially in the great harvesting lands in Georgia, and some Natives fought back and back.…

    • 1032 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Andrew Jackson is a villain. Well here's some reason why he's a villain. He killed native americans. He also burned down their houses. On top of that he stole land from the native Americans.…

    • 137 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dbq Indian Removal

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Treaties was one way the U.S. Government us to displace Indians from their land, the removal act of 1830 was a mechanism used to displace the Indians. Where this failed, the government broke the treaties and the court's ruling to spread the movement west. Americans flocked to the south, began moving toward into what would become Alabama and Mississippi. The Indian tribes living there created a problem to the expansion; white settlers petitioned the government to remove them President Thomas Jefferson and James Monroe wanted the tribes to trade their land for lands in the west. This did not happen the major transfer happen only because of war.…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The answer to research question will unveil why the Cherokees termed the journey as the trail of tears. The Cherokee lived in east Mississippi however in early 19th century, white settlers perceived Cherokees and other Indian Nations as obstacles to development. The settlers influenced the federal government to acquire the Indian Territory for purposes of planting cotton. In 1814 the federal government headed by President Jackson yielded to pressure and commanded the US military forces to remove Indians; they started by defeating the Creek nation, and then shifted to the Seminoles because they had harbored fugitive slaves who lived among them.…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Creek Indians dwelt on lands in Georgia and Alabama. They were part of the Five Civilized Tribes. Many of the Creek Indians readily adopted the lifestyle of the white settlers.…

    • 1519 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cherokee Patriarchy

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Seminoles roots were in Africa and New World and Creek mingled with native Floridians and allied with “marooned communities”. After many battles with Americans, The Treaty of Moultrie Creek removed tribe from fertile land. The Americanization of the Creeks was more prevalent in western Georgia among the Lower Creeks than in Upper Creek Towns, and came from internal and external processes. The US government's and Benjamin Hawkin's pressure on the Creeks to assimilate stood in contrast to the more natural blending of cultures that came from a long tradition of cohabitation and cultural appropriation, beginning with white traders in Indian country. Many of the most prominent Creek chiefs before the Creek War were "mixed-bloods" like William McGillivray and William McIntosh (who were on opposing sides of the Creek Civil…

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Manifest Destiny can be described as a U.S expansion that America had to expand their territory west. After independence had been conquered in the Revolution and then again in the War of 1812, a strong sense of nationalism was spread across the nation and demanded more land and opportunity. This westward expansion was also sparked by the Second Great Awakening where many settlers claimed that God called personally for the growth of the nation (UShist)These same settlers didn’t see fit of Natives in this vision and even labeled them as heathens. As a result of this derogatory label on the Natives and the belief that America had to continue to expand, many of the Native Americans were forced from their land. The United States justified this…

    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Era where the Indians and the white people got along came to a crashing end. After the United States started to push the Indians off their land and force them into a smaller territory which we now call an Indian reservation. The interaction between the Indians and the white people did not have the greatest relationship but they were able to live together. The ways the Indians lived and way the whites lived their lives were different which one of the reason why they didn’t get along. The Battle of Little Bighorn was an important battle, for both the Indians and the United States.…

    • 1084 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The natives land was constantly being settled on, their livestock stolen, even their villages burned to the ground by the European American Settlers. By signing with the Indian Removal Act, the indigenous peoples were given an opportunity to get away from the violence and discrimination of the settlers. The Indian Removal Act gave the Native Americans a means of survival, thus benefitting the Native Americans and saving many lives that may have been lost on both the European American and the Native American sides had the Native Americans remained on their homeland.            The Native American Tribes were offered land west of the Mississippi River that they would have total sovereignty over. President Andrew Jackson was given the legal right by the Indian Removal Policy to grant the land west of the Mississippi River to the Native Americans for them alone to govern over to the tribes that did agree to give up their ancestral homelands. Most of the European American population believed that America would never expand beyond the Mississippi River, so the Native American Tribes would be safe from the settlers heading west to create their homes on the new…

    • 1408 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays