Creation Vs Creation Argument

1184 Words 5 Pages
Bill Nye and Ken Ham had an argument creation vs. evolution in 2014. Nye was for creation while Ham was against creation and for evolution. It occurred over more than a two-hour debate where both of the men presented their beliefs on how they view the Earth and how its surroundings were created. During the debate a man named Richard Arthur made a top rated comment that said, "As a Christian I will say this: My faith does not require me to believe in the age of the earth as outlined in the Bible. Christ commanded me to love and that is where all Christians need to focus. Discussing how many fairies can dance on the head of a pin is a distraction." Many of those supported that comment he made even some atheists. Through the debate they stated …show more content…
evolution debates, many creationists win due to the fact that evolution does not have much support behind it while creation has a lot of the bible. Many leading evolutionists decline the offer to have a scientific debate of creation of evolution now a day. The Creation Ministries International is a network of creation ministries that started in Australia and now has many offices all through the Unites States such as the United Kingdom, New Zealand, South Africa and Singapore. This organization publishes Creation magazines and Journal of Creation, which inform people about creation, and tells much about it. This organization has a Creation Bus they call which tours rural areas of Australia, churches where people speak and schools in smaller communities. They also have a thing called the Ark Van that visits churches, Sunday schools, agricultural shows, and community events in and around Australia. I think this organization is a really good organization due to the fact it gives much information about creation and shows it through out the world in different …show more content…
Campaign is launched by the Creation Ministries organization, which is a worldwide movement to challenge the ant-Christians of evolution. The focus of this campaign is on 15 questions that evolutionists seem to not be able to answer. (1) How did life originate? How did life with hundreds of proteins originate just by chemistry without intelligent design? (2) How did the DNA code originate? (3) How could such errors create 3 billion letters of DNA information to change a microbe into a microbiologist? How can scrambling existing DNA information create a new biochemical pathway or Nano-machines? (4) Why is natural selection taught as ‘evolution’ as if it explains the origin of the diversity of life? (5) How did new biochemical pathways, which involve multiple enzymes working together in sequence, originate? (6) Living things look like they were designed, so how do evolutionists know that they were not designed? Why should science be restricted to naturalistic causes rather than logical causes? (7) How did multi-cellular life originate? (8) How did sex originate? (9) Why are the countless millions of transitional fossils missing? (10) How do ‘living fossils’ remain unchanged over supposed hundreds of millions of years? (11) How did blind chemistry create mind/intelligence, meaning, altruism and morality? (12) Why is evolutionary ‘just-so’ story-telling tolerated? (13) Where are the scientific breakthroughs due to evolution? Why do schools and

Related Documents