What if scientists told the world that evolution may not be true? What if they showed the world an alternative view to human history? For many years the dominant consensus on how humans came to be has been through the evolution theory. Many scientists, and people around the world view the evolution theory to be correct, sometimes without question. However, a new chapter in human history has opened up and it’s called Forbidden Archaeology. Forbidden Archaeology has challenged the evolution theory by providing numerous facts and physical proof that our human time line may have been back up to 50 million years ago rather than 12,000 years ago.We have been taught by mainstream science that humans came to be by evolution around 12,000 years ago; however, Forbidden Archaeology proves the antiquity may ultimately …show more content…
All though many scientists do not go out of their way to find artifacts that debunk the theory, some just happen to find them. In this year, 2015, a brand new encounter of ancient human tools were found. It was a huge discovery because these tools are known to be around 3.3 million years old. In the article that reported this discovery, they note, “The tools, whose makers may or may not have been some sort of human ancestor, push the known date of such tools back by 700,000 years” (Phys News). These tools were found in a site called Lomekwi 3, in West Turkana, Kenya. Along with these tools, several human bones, and teeth were also found. Chris Lepre, geologist, dated the artifacts by the layer of ash it was found in. The volcanic ash below the below the tool site set a “floor” on the site’s age. Based on the ratio of argon isotopes in the ash, Lepre could date the site to be 3.3 million years old. These findings can conclude that humans existed during that time, and were already becoming