Court Argument Analysis

Improved Essays
At the point when a legitimate question emerges as to competency, the litigant has a privilege to a hearing to determine fitness to stand trial. All trial courts have expert to arrange mental assessments of defendants, and in many states, an assessment is programmed once a gathering raises the competency issue. Judges are to give incredible weight to the after effects of an assessment, yet can consider different components, as well, like the defendant’s manner in court. Among the focuses a court ought to consider are whether the defendant can:
• adequately communicate with defense counsel
• understand and prepare data
• make choices with respect to the case, and
• understand the components of the charges, the gravity of the charges, and

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    COMES NOW the Defendant, Richard John Ohlhaver, by and through counsel, Vernida R. Chaney, and moves this Honorable Court for entry of an order authorizing a competency evaluation pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §4241. In support of this motion, the following is submitted: 1. Mr. Ohlhaver is charged with Conspiracy to Commit Theft, 18 U.S.C.§ 371; Theft of Government Property, 18 U.S.C. § 641; Concealment of Event Affecting Right to a Title II Benefit, 42 U.S.C. § 408; Access Device Fraud, 18 U.S.C. § 1029(a)(2); and False Statement for use in Determining Right to Title II Benefit Payment, 18 U.S.C. § 408(a)(3). 2.…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Supreme Court Case Essay

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Title and Citation: Fry V. Napoleon Community School District Topic: A school district denying the student the right to have a service dog attend school. Level or Type of Court: Supreme Court- Oct 2016 Facts of the Case: A student with cerebral palsy obtained a service dog with the doctor’s approval to help her live as independent as possible. The service dog was hypo-allergenic and was to stay out of the way when not needed.…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Virginia Cooper Summary

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the research study conducted by Virginia G. Cooper and Patricia A. Zapf, they are looking to come up with potential accurate diagnosis guidelines for declaring if someone is competent or incompetent when coming to their ability to stand trial. This is something they are evaluating, because there are many individuals each year sent for “competency evaluations” and there are no procedures set up from ”the courts for making a competency evaluation” (424). They are hoping to find out what factors reliably determine competency. Cooper and Zapf are specifically looking for potential prejudices of “clinicians” rulings of “468 criminal defendants” from “Taylor Hardin Secure Medical Facility in 1994 to 1997” on their “competency” by analyzing the…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The courts biggest issues were trying to decide whether a trial court’s erroneous deprivation of a criminal defendant’s choice of counsel entitles him to a reversal of his conviction and should proving the sixth Amendment right to proceed with the counsel of choice depend on whether the deprivation of that right also resulted in compromising a defendants’ right to a fair trial. The majority opinion did not apply the Strickland test because they felt that the defendant could not show or give any reason as to why he felt the counsel was ineffective and that the counsels performance was poorly presented and deficient and the defendant was prejudiced by it. What the Strickland test is actually intended for is that the government must contend that the defendant must at least demonstrate that his counsel of choice would have pursued a different strategy and would have created a :reasonable probability”. In court cases the course can be split into two structures; trial errors and structural errors. Most constitutional errors are trial errors that occur “during the presentation to the jury,” and courts have discretion in deciding whether these trial errors are harmless and warrant a new trial.…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mr. Moreno Case Summary

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Test and Dot Counting Test) on which he obtained scores indicating he was not feigning memory impairment or exhibiting motivational difficulties, which lends to the validity of the testing results and information disclosed during the clinical interview. There does not appear to be a cause for concern for Mr. Moreno’s learning or memory abilities at this time. Mr. Moreno was administered the WTAR. Mr. Moreno’s cognitive outcomes were stable and average in performance. The estimate of Mr. Moreno’s premorbid Full-Scale IQ was 84 plus or minus 15 points or likely falling in the Low Average Range in the 14-percentile range.…

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Circuit Court Case Study

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages

    On June 1, 2012, Wilson-Gaskins, pro se, filed a complaint in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County against Kaye, Kaye’s professional liability insurer, and GEICO, alleging that they had engaged in “legal malpractice, retaliation and collusion.” Thereafter, Wilson-Gaskins retained counsel, venue was transferred to Montgomery County, and GEICO and Kaye’s professional liability insurer were dismissed from the action. In an amended complaint, Wilson-Gaskins asserted that Kaye’s breach of his professional duty of care constituted professional negligence and a breach of contract.…

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    When Affirmative Action first came into existence, it was not well received. A lot of scholars did not believe it was necessary. A scholar specifically named Thomas Sowell believed that Affirmative Action had a reversed outcome than what the creators had intended. He asserts that “Policies initiated to help the disadvantaged ended up helping the privileged within the preferred groups instead. Policies intended to insure intergroup harmony led to intergroup resentments and violence.”…

    • 1243 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Summary: A Follow-USudy

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The researchers found that the rate of dropped from approximately 65% at the beginning of a session to almost 0% by the end. They controlled for relevant factors such as idiosyncrasies of each judge, the defendant’s demographic information, and legal factors of each case; the only other factors with statistical significance were previous incarcerations and participation in a rehabilitation program. The researchers…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Virginia’s state law is forbidding the request of Lee and Burwell Reynolds to allow black juries on their trial. On December 1877, the Reynolds brothers were on trial for killing a white man named, Aaron Shelton. The attorneys of the brothers couldn’t change Judge Treadway’s mind into accepting their request. Until, Alexander Rives, a judge, decided to defend the rights of Lee and Burwell by preventing discrimination towards their race and color. He argued that the Virginia state court has violated the Fourteenth Amendment and the federal Civil Rights Act of 1875.…

    • 1607 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    two feet, gain their self-esteem, and regain their relationship with their children and family members (Kaye, 2004). Another problem-solving courts with successful results include domestic violence courts. Domestic violence cases arose in the 1900s and it was evident that not enough was being done in order to protect the victims. Problem-solving courts allow for one judge to overview the case from the beginning to the end.…

    • 1424 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg has been a stalwart supporter of women’s rights and LGBT rights. Her rulings on cases concerning women's rights and as LGBT rights have continued the impression Justice O’Connor gave in her decision in Roe v. Wade that gender may indeed matter in rulings with this trend most likely going to continue with Justices Sotomayor and Kagan. She is considered as one the 100 Most Powerful Women and has spent time advocating for women's rights in the duration of her career. The question being is asked is “Does the gender of the Justices affect the ruling?” Women comprise one half, 50% of all human beings and American citizen so it begs the question whether men and women think different ways when it comes to judicial rulings…

    • 1711 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The state circuit court of appeals is a three-prong system. The lower level is the state circuit court of appeals, and the second would be federal appeals, and for the most controversial cases the United States Supreme Court. The duty of all of the lower level c courts are the same…to determine if the trial court did make any legal errors, and if so can a new legislation or law be made to ensure it does not happen again. The duty of the Supreme Court is to determine if a decision the Federal Court made is constitutional. If it is not the judgment is over turned and will not stand.…

    • 892 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Three Important Court Questions Brendon L. Johnson Tarleton State University Investigating crimes can be a hard job to do, having cases pile up and not having leads but probably the hardest case to investigate is a case that involves a child. According to FindLaw children are at a big risk. First and foremost investigating a crime that has a child as the victim can be a hard thing to have to see. That can take a toll on the people investigating the crime.…

    • 1404 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As of this writing, there have been a total of one-hundred twelve Justices of the United States Supreme Court. It is recognized as the highest legal body in the land, and as such, the Justices of this Court are all extremely well respected. All members of this hallowed institution have rightly earned the designation as significant legal scholars. The notion has been put forward that Justice Antonin Scalia is the most significant member of the Court in United States history. This is an exaggeration to say the least.…

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Drug Court Arguments

    • 1703 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Drug Courts Drug courts are here to help those in need and establish a better society for this country. The first drug court began in Florida in 1989 because there was a lot of drug cases that were similar to each other, so instead of wasting the judge’s time, the government decided to create drug courts (History). Drug courts was a positive effect to this country, however, many people still do not like this idea of having a drug court. Drug courts has caused many arguments which created two sides, the side who are for drug courts and the side who are against drug courts; there are not many people who feel neutral about this certain situation.…

    • 1703 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays

Related Topics