Counter Strike Diplomacy
In 1962, the Soviet Union housed a nearby arsenal of nuclear missiles within he confines of Cuba, immediate action was required, post haste. President Kennedy 's cabinet rallied for him to give the green light on an operation that entailed sending a precise air strike that planned to dispose of the alleged nuclear weapons, before the Soviet Union had a chance to make good use of them. However, with the firearms ' combat readiness still essentially in question, and innocent civilians populating the territory, this proposed Option A immediately appeared to come attached with grim strings, and at the worst case, warfare. The Soviet Union essentially neglected to respond to diplomatic measures, they blatantly lied …show more content…
The Soviet Union responded with mixed messages, and things almost seemed to go in the favor of the U.S. when some of the Soviet ships turned around. Diplomatic rationale indeed appeared present as the Soviets offered to remove the missiles in Cuba, so long as the U.S. pulled out their Jupiter missiles from Turkey. After a few mishaps, the U.S. ran a nuclear weapon test (without the President 's consent), which cost the life of a reconnaissance pilot, and the U.S. eventually made preparations for an invasion of Cuba. War appeared to be eminent. Fortunately, after on final attempt for political reparations, a deal was made, and the Soviets agreed to withdraw their missiles in exchange for an inconspicuous withdrawal of the U.S ' obsolete missiles in Turkey. Given the fact that the two nations were on the brink of a global crisis, the United States handled diplomatic strategy with absolute brilliance. There was no condemning the Big Red Dog, but the U.S. handled negotiations with the assertiveness necessary to bargain with the …show more content…
While they may not always have essentially allocated to this alleged ideal throughout history, two or more wrongs do not make a right, especially when high stakes are on the line, and the U.S. is already intertwined in affairs in Southeast Asia, as mentioned at the end of the film. Sincerely, one of the bittersweet victories behind the Board of Defense, was that they were ready to engage at anytime. Given that they were dealing with a threat as unwavering as the Soviet Union, it was an essential cornerstone in the United States ' strategic planning. They never counted out the possibility of engagement, nor should they have. Preparations for worse case scenario inevitably leads, to best case strategy, time and time again. More or less planning defensively keeps commandeers at least risk in case of rash driving by other militaristic motorists. Then again, any historian in full favor of the U.S. may have been prey to hindsight bias, as many would agree, when faced with the threat of atomic nuclear weaponry, you are going to want to strike first, before things get
In 1962, the Soviet Union housed a nearby arsenal of nuclear missiles within he confines of Cuba, immediate action was required, post haste. President Kennedy 's cabinet rallied for him to give the green light on an operation that entailed sending a precise air strike that planned to dispose of the alleged nuclear weapons, before the Soviet Union had a chance to make good use of them. However, with the firearms ' combat readiness still essentially in question, and innocent civilians populating the territory, this proposed Option A immediately appeared to come attached with grim strings, and at the worst case, warfare. The Soviet Union essentially neglected to respond to diplomatic measures, they blatantly lied …show more content…
The Soviet Union responded with mixed messages, and things almost seemed to go in the favor of the U.S. when some of the Soviet ships turned around. Diplomatic rationale indeed appeared present as the Soviets offered to remove the missiles in Cuba, so long as the U.S. pulled out their Jupiter missiles from Turkey. After a few mishaps, the U.S. ran a nuclear weapon test (without the President 's consent), which cost the life of a reconnaissance pilot, and the U.S. eventually made preparations for an invasion of Cuba. War appeared to be eminent. Fortunately, after on final attempt for political reparations, a deal was made, and the Soviets agreed to withdraw their missiles in exchange for an inconspicuous withdrawal of the U.S ' obsolete missiles in Turkey. Given the fact that the two nations were on the brink of a global crisis, the United States handled diplomatic strategy with absolute brilliance. There was no condemning the Big Red Dog, but the U.S. handled negotiations with the assertiveness necessary to bargain with the …show more content…
While they may not always have essentially allocated to this alleged ideal throughout history, two or more wrongs do not make a right, especially when high stakes are on the line, and the U.S. is already intertwined in affairs in Southeast Asia, as mentioned at the end of the film. Sincerely, one of the bittersweet victories behind the Board of Defense, was that they were ready to engage at anytime. Given that they were dealing with a threat as unwavering as the Soviet Union, it was an essential cornerstone in the United States ' strategic planning. They never counted out the possibility of engagement, nor should they have. Preparations for worse case scenario inevitably leads, to best case strategy, time and time again. More or less planning defensively keeps commandeers at least risk in case of rash driving by other militaristic motorists. Then again, any historian in full favor of the U.S. may have been prey to hindsight bias, as many would agree, when faced with the threat of atomic nuclear weaponry, you are going to want to strike first, before things get