Similarities Between Montesquieu And John Locke Theory

Improved Essays
The Comparison between Montesquieu and John Locke Theory
In the theory of separation of John Locke, the state power is divided to three state institutions, namely the executive agencies (regulators and law), the legislative (follow the rules and laws), and federative institutions (running diplomatic function with the countries other). Whereas, in the theory of separation of powers Montesquieu, state power is divided to three institutions, namely the executive agencies (regulators and law), the legislature (running rules and laws), and the judiciary (the courts). Thus, the difference lies in the existence of the federative institutions supported by Locke idea and existence of the judiciary which is supported by the thought of Montesquieu. In the thought of Montesquieu, function federative institutions run by the executive branch composed of representatives of the people. John Locke argued that the legislature should have a position superior to the federative institutions and executives.
…show more content…
Whereas, the differences between the United Kingdom and Indonesia government systems are United Kingdom embraced a parliamentary system of government, while Indonesia adheres to a presidential system, United Kingdom has no written constitution and a single, while Indonesia has a single and a written Constitution in 1945, In United Kingdom government, ministers in a cabinet responsible to parliament, while the minister in the cabinet of the government of Indonesia is responsible to the president of the executive in this regard, holder of executive power in this case British prime minister, chosen by the queen of the ruling party in Indonesia, while President chosen by the people through direct election, England does not have the highest judicial institution, Indonesia has the highest judicial institution of the Supreme

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Compare how the two philosophers Thomas Hobbs and John Locke, in an ideal state, who should have the power and how much power the ruler should have. First, we need to establish what is an ideal state. According to the two of them. Next, compare them both to one another and then try to explain their arguments. By describing their views in our own words.…

    • 166 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Great Seal Analysis

    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In the new governments by the states, the most important layer became, just like in The Great Seal’s pyramid, not the top but the bottom. “By throwing off monarchy and becoming republicans in 1776, Americans offered a different concept of what people were like and new ways of organizing both the state and the society.” (93) With power held in the lowermost layer of society, there needed to be a way to ensure the power stayed in that location. To make this happen Americans adopted Montesquieu’s doctrine of separation of powers. Despite the separation of powers doctrine, most state constitution further felt the need to establish a weak executive.…

    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Framers

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Specifically, Montesquieu originally suggested the separation of powers and Locke suggested checks and balances, two systems which are currently in place…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    By doing this, Montesquieu hoped that the government would become less corrupt and make better decisions. In TCI Chapter 34 section 5 is states “Like John Locke, Montesquieu was concerned with how to protect political…

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There were many philosophers during the Enlightenment Era, but one that stood out was a french political philosopher named, “ Montesquieu”. He created the theory of Separation of Powers; which he was best known for. Montesquieu believed that all the power should not go to one individual, but to split the power between groups. In the American Political System today, this simple idea came to be the three branches of government; legislative, executive and judicial. The three branches split the power to form a government, such…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The enlightenment began in the mid 1600’s about 100 years before America annexed themselves from Great Britain. Throughout that time period, thinkers such as John Locke, Montesquieu, and Voltaire would question the way the government worked and describe the way they thought the government should work. Many of these Enlightenment thinkers believed that people should have certain undeniable rights, and that an absolute monarchy obstructs those rights because the people being governed have no say in what is happening to them. This is not unlike the American Revolution which was heavily influenced by the Enlightenment. America’s founding Documents were heavily influenced by the Enlightenment thinking of John Locke, Montesquieu, and Voltaire.…

    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Locke’s philosophies were very influential in the way our government was shaped and even today most of these belief still play a large role in every day life. The systems that are still in place today are that the government gets its power from its people, the social contract, the separation of powers and mans natural rights. The main difference between Locke’s ideal use of government and todays use of government is that today the government is used for a lot more than just the protection of life, liberty, property. While today government still protects Locke 's natural rights it is being used like Russo’s ideal form of government as well, its has become a way for all to receive equality. While all three men did not agree on the same philosophies regarding the the pre-political nature of man, state of nature, and what the real purpose government is for, they created a constitution that helped set up the United States for greatness.…

    • 1236 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Locke believed that the government should be ran by the people and everything should be made in the people’s favor. In the situation where the old government fails he recommended the legislative and executive branches but this decision is should be made by people. John Locke once stated in the “Second treatise on the Civil Government” “All Men are naturally “a state of perfect freedom… within the bounds of the law of nature”(Document A). What he meant from this is that We are all free and no one can stop us.…

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The motto of America “to protect its citizens” was the base for creation of every document in country’s history. The Seven Articles of the United States Constitution guarantees the protection of our rights. They granted all national powers to the congress; however, it allowed each state to retain its sovereignty, freedom, and independence. The Three Branches of government protect our society from single unlimited power and leave the nation in safe position.…

    • 1650 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One reason the boys on the island failed to effectively govern themselves is because they lacked a system of separation of powers/checks and balances to prevent any one person from becoming too powerful. Baron de Montesquieu believed that the best government is one in which power is balanced among three separate branches of government with equal but different powers. He thought that England in the eighteenth century provided the best model of government because it divided power among three parts: the king, who enforced laws; the Parliament, which created laws; and a court system, which interpreted laws. Montesquieu’s main belief was that the best way to govern was to use a system he called “the separation of powers”. He felt that if all political power is handed over to one branch, greed and corruption inevitably result.…

    • 1528 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Monique Wilder Professor David Hill SSP 101.7920 July 15, 2015 Midterm 1) Explain the main differences and similarities between the ideas of Hobbes and Locke’s. Similarities include: rights, state of nature, atheism, powers of a sovereign, and the idea that governments are beneficial. John Locke and Thomas Hobbes are two social contract theorist who share similarities in their Social Contract Theories, however they both have differences. The social contract theory is a voluntary agreement among individuals by which organized society is brought into being and invested with the right to secure mutual protection and welfare or to regulate the relations among its members.…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Comparison of British and American political system The British and American political systems have both similarities and differences. Most notably, the British political system is a democratic constitutional monarchy, consisting of a monarch and a prime minister. The United States of America however, is a federal republic with a separation of power between three branches. Beyond these two key differences, the two countries have political similarities such as a dual-chamber, two dominating political parties as well as scheduled elections.…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The United States and the United Kingdom’s system of choosing the leader of vary greatly in how the processes are done. But if one were to investigate and research further into the systems, one would find the fundamental processes are similar in which they operate with only a few key differences between the two electoral processes. One of the major differences between the United Kingdom and the United States is that in the UK citizens do not directly elect the leader of the country, they simply vote for members of parliament, and the party with the most seats in parliament usually has its leader selected by the Queen as its prime minister. (UK Parliament 2015) The difference between that process and the one present in the United States is that…

    • 2495 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    The ‘separation of powers’ is a doctrine that has caused much debate through the centuries, and although it is difficult to find its exact origins, it is possible to distinguish a basic separation of powers doctrine from the writings of Greek philosopher Aristotle. He remarked that a constitution must have three elements to be effective. The three are, first the deliberative, which discusses everything of common importance; second, the officials…; and third, the judicial element. The English political theorist, John Locke, conceived a similar idea about the different types of power.…

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Majoritarianism Analysis

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Majoritarianism In the Context of British Politics In a nutshell, majoritarian politics is democracy taken to a more extreme level. Majoritarian governments are designed to favor the ideas of the ruling majority, as well as pass legislation based on the views of that group. The government of the United Kingdom has historically been majoritarian; utilizing a system built on fast and simple decision-making. In accordance with its historical roots, can the same tenets of majoritarianism be observed in the modern-day government of the United Kingdom?…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays