In the theory of separation of John Locke, the state power is divided to three state institutions, namely the executive agencies (regulators and law), the legislative (follow the rules and laws), and federative institutions (running diplomatic function with the countries other). Whereas, in the theory of separation of powers Montesquieu, state power is divided to three institutions, namely the executive agencies (regulators and law), the legislature (running rules and laws), and the judiciary (the courts). Thus, the difference lies in the existence of the federative institutions supported by Locke idea and existence of the judiciary which is supported by the thought of Montesquieu. In the thought of Montesquieu, function federative institutions run by the executive branch composed of representatives of the people. John Locke argued that the legislature should have a position superior to the federative institutions and executives. …show more content…
Whereas, the differences between the United Kingdom and Indonesia government systems are United Kingdom embraced a parliamentary system of government, while Indonesia adheres to a presidential system, United Kingdom has no written constitution and a single, while Indonesia has a single and a written Constitution in 1945, In United Kingdom government, ministers in a cabinet responsible to parliament, while the minister in the cabinet of the government of Indonesia is responsible to the president of the executive in this regard, holder of executive power in this case British prime minister, chosen by the queen of the ruling party in Indonesia, while President chosen by the people through direct election, England does not have the highest judicial institution, Indonesia has the highest judicial institution of the Supreme