Shiners Model

Improved Essays
Counsel cannot legally withhold information pertaining to their client’s case (Model, 1995). They have to inform them of any consequences that they are looking to face as well as keep them informed of the status of their case. This violates Rule 1.4 in Communication, by stating that legal consequences cannot be discussed between the Counsel and Shiners (Model, 1995). They have the right to communicate in client- lawyer privilege. The Counsel is obligated to inform their clients about any decision or circumstance that occurs within their case (Model, 1995). According to Rule 1.4, the lawyer should provide information in regards to how they plan to represent the client and successfully win their case. The lawyer must advise the client about any limitations that they may encounter while representing them (Model, 1995). Overall, this model rule shows that the lawyer must keep a certain level of communication. The client must be given details pertaining to their case and matters must be explained in a manner that allows for the Shiners to make informed decisions (Model, 1995).
Counsel does have a requirement to make progress in completing their client’s case. Rule 1.3 references that diligence that should be done with each case that a lawyer takes
…show more content…
According to Rule 1.5 in regards to fees, a lawyer is not permitted to charge unreasonable fees (Model, 1995). There are several determining factors to certify that they fees being requested are reasonable; the time and labor that the legal representative has to put into the case, determining the likelihood of the counsel being able to work on other cases, local fees, results, any limitations that may be put in place, the details of the professional relationship between client and counsel, experience, reputation, fixed fees or contingent (Model, 1995). These are all factors that take part in determining the charges that the lawyer can present to their

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Ec-1.3 Vs Aba

    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Lawyer Howe violated Rule 1.3 of ABA's law not to act reasonably and quickly to represent clients because he did not exist. He also violated Rule 5.5 (b) of the Aba Act after Karl told him that he had a new case and did not appropriately respond to Karl's proceedings. Carl failed to present himself and his place as a quasi-legal who violates EC-1.7 (a). Carl accepted the case he agreed with the client on all fees and gave them legal advice, and this was not acceptable and unauthorized of the law violating EC-1.8 (a). Carl inadvertently revealed the other client's information by allowing Zeke to use the phone as the documents were in the scenery.…

    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Upl Law Case Study

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The law holds laywers responsible for not only their behavior but the behavior at work of all their employees, assistants, representatives, and paralegals and volunteers. These rules that hold attorneys to the highest of accountability are outlined very clearly make no mistake in the Model Rules of Profesional Conduct in regards to UPL and ethics. If any attorney fails to uphold these rules, regulations and conduct they will be facing a variety of disciplinary actions taken that may include fines, plenalties, disbarment, suspension or any combination thereof. The courts hold attorneys to high standards and they require and expect attorneys will be on their toes to this issue of areas pertaining to them, their law firm pratices, and the staff entirely. The gavel will be brought down harder on the attorney even if their staff violates UPL.…

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Assignment You have asked me to research the Padilla claim to determine whether our client, Piotr Budziszewski, had ineffective assistance of counsel because they failed to let him know that he would face deportation if plead guilty to one count of possession of a controlled substance with intent to sell. Legal Issue When counsel fails to notify their client of the immigration consequences that would come from pleading guilty, are they guilty of ineffective counsel thus violating the client’s rights guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment? Facts Piotr Budziszewski, a Polish man and lawful permanent resident of United States plead guilty to one count of possession of a controlled substance with intent to sell, an aggravated felony. He was originally charged with two counts of selling narcotics by a person who is not drug-dependent in violation of General Statutes § 21a-278 (b), and two counts of possession of a narcotic substance with intent to sell in violation of General Statutes § 21a-279 (a).…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Ethical Dilemmas of Defense Attorneys Defense attorneys have to face the ethical dilemma every day of whether or not to defend their client as well as whether or not to maintain that lawyer-client privilege. The lawyer-client privilege provides a security blanket for the client. Under this privilege, the client can almost tell the lawyer just about anything in confidence and not have to worry about the possible fear of being judged or incriminating themselves. A defense attorney serves as a guide that you can basically tell all your deepest darkest secrets to. However, some of those secrets may not always be able to be kept confidential, so be careful about what secrets you share.…

    • 3179 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Court ultimately decided that the notes could not be handed over under the protection of the attorney – client privilege. The justices reminded the Court that the attorney – client privilege was put into place to encourage complete and truthful communication between attorneys and their clients. The…

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Sobonist Case Model

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Goal 1: Sobonist will comply with the treatment recommendations of his providers. • Mr. Williams was pleasant and kind providing the QP information about how the justice system works. • Mr. Williams informed the QP “the public defender works for the stated; however, the public defender represents the client and if the client doesn’t agree they have to honor that.” • Mr. Williams shared, “a form can be completed as well as asking the judge for a different public defender; however, I would suggest talking to the attorney person to see if the difference can be worked out.” • Mr. Williams commented, “a certain attorney can be requested if the defendant has the attorney on another case or if the defendant has already talked to the attorney they wanted and they agree to take the case.”…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Ron V. Fieryl

    • 416 Words
    • 2 Pages

    If the lawyer decides that they want to continue to represent Cheryl, the lawyer should communicate the next steps in the litigation, such as the inappropriately obtained documents have a high possibility of not making it. (In re Shell Oil Refinery; Lipin v. Bender). A lawyer can not violate an ethical rule through the acts of others. A lawyer can not violate the ethical rules through the acts of another. (8.4)…

    • 416 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    2017-0020. The case involved disclosing confidential information without client consent. During a divorce proceeding, the client’s attorney subpoenaed the counselor’s notes. The notes contained information on a session held with the client and the client’s spouse. Confidentiality limits nor exclusions were documented as having been discussed during the session, nor did the counselor seek approval from the spouse to disclose the information.…

    • 692 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    As long as these activities are not conducted then the defense counsel is legally operating within the scope of the law. However, a zealous defense can trigger several individuals…

    • 1910 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    In this situation, sales turns into the moral inquiry. The considerable lion's share of states oversee direct contact with potential customers without characterizing the expression "requesting. " Those states that do characterize it change starting with one then onto the next. The ABA Model Rules likewise did not have a meaning of that term until August 2012, when the Comment to ABA Model Rule 7.3 was altered to state: "A sales is a focused on correspondence started by the legal counselor that is coordinated to a particular individual and that offers to give, or can sensibly be comprehended as offering to give, lawful administrations.…

    • 1646 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Being A Paralegal Essay

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages

    And then, there is a chance that you will get mistake. I agree with this Article that the paralegal should visit the court room before the trial, identify the details and advantage of the team, the line of the jurors, the witness and the judge, the position of the of visual aids and documents, the layout of the courtroom and the courthouse, where to eat and park, electrical switches, restrooms etc. So, they could get more ideas and it is a big help for the team, less stress and for the judge. When they are prepared, they are confident with the…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    With taking active interest a lawyer may take pride in the contributions they are making to society. With attorney working for inters solely of a client, like a large cooperation, there is the possibility of them losing sight of the greater good of society in the monotonous…

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Any attorney who knows that another attorney has committed a violation under the Rules of Professional Conduct shall inform the proper professional authority. As for Joey, he too has committed this offense by not going forth with informing the bar. Joey has further committed violations under the Model Rules. Under Rule 8.4, Joey, violated and attempted to violate this rule by knowingly assisted Chandler to go to another firm. He wrote a reference letter to the bar that did not mention the conviction.…

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Main 5 Indications of an Awesome Mesothelioma Attorney Searching for the best attorney to speak to you in any lawsuit is will undoubtedly be a titanic assignment. In any case, its significance can't be repudiated. In terminal cases, you can make certain that the significance is much more upgraded. This is such a case for Mesothelioma. This lethal illness influences the most indispensable organs and along these lines, it will generally prompt demise.…

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When faced with ineffective assistance of counsel it is impossible for a defendant to knowingly abandon a right or privilege, whose existence he does not truly understand exists. Here, if a defendant does not know that they are victims of ineffective assistance of counsel then a Rule 11 colloquy does not assist the defendants in their understanding of whether they attained effective legal representation. For example, the transcript of the Rule 11 hearing shows that the Court never asked whether the brothers understood effective versus ineffective assistance of counsel; whether they understood reasonable diligence in legal representation; whether they understood the actual work expected of attorneys in CCE and money laundering cases and against…

    • 636 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics