Will Of God Case Study

Improved Essays
1. Could the will of God be the only guide to which actions are morally right? 1100-1300 words

The question of whether the will of god determines what actions are morally right utimately rests on the assumption that he exists. As there has been no scientific proof on either side of that particular argument, this problem quickly stagnates. It is often left with people agreeing to disagree, or trying to change the other person 's belief to match their own. If god does not exist, then there is clearly no point in acting according to Christian morals. Without the threat of heaven or hell after death, we would most likely form social expectations resembling morals, but they would not be binding. However if we take a philosophical approach and assume
…show more content…
If anything god says is to be taken as good and true, then he cannot be wrong. If he cannot be wrong, then there is nothing to make his commands right either. For example, if a game was created with the rule that a specific person could never lose, it would be meaningless to say that he is good at that game. No matter how many times he won, there would be no skill or wisdom involved as it is not possible for him to lose (LaFollette, 2007). In this same way there would be no point in worshipping god 's goodness, as it is nothing exceptional if he has no choice but to be …show more content…
if you were take the word of the bible as the source of the will of god, his word is unchanging. “Jesus Christ is the same yesterday and today and forever ” (Hebrews 13:8). God 's will is unchanging, therefore morals are unchanging as well. This argument does become problematic because the bible also states that god is all powerful, and therefore can do anything, which would include changing his word.

Counter arguements

As the divine command theory is logically exhaustive, a supporter must choose one of the above options to follow. However as both of them lead to be false, Divine command theory cannot be supported, and therefore god cannot be the only guide to which actions are right or wrong.

Divine command theory what makes an action right is that god commands it to be done what makes an action wrong is that god commands it not to be done morals cannot change as it is the word of god, society doesn 't matter reasons for actions do not matter, only that the action is

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    P3: Those who do not believe in a god do not believe that God can guide our morals. C: Therefore, religious teachings are not an infallible source. This would mean that religious teachings are not an infallible guide, because to be “infallible” means to be incapable of error. Due to there being multiple ways to interpret religious teachings that would mean that they are not free of error. To reexamine the argument in favor, I would say that it is a valid argument, because if the premises are true then the conclusion would also logically be true.…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    It is also important to learn about the Euthypro Problem that accompanies the theory because, without the problem, the person would not know why the theory leads to the conclusion that morality is not associated with the will of God. Lastly, it is vital to know that one can still believe in God even if morality is not handed down by Him, just like what St. Aquinas…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    The reason for why God commands something is this love and it would be logically impossible for God to command something which would go against his character. Therefore, morality cannot be held as being unstructured. However, this is not a sufficient defence of the theory, as we could respond by saying that if God had loved something else, murder for example; then morality would be different to what we have now. Secondly, Socrates second horn destroys the validity of God being Good (Law, 2015). If something is good because it is the will of God, then God is Good because this is his will.…

    • 1485 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In nature we see that each occasion has a cause; consequently, there more likely than not been an underlying cause to get the universe to unfurl as so. The underlying cause is God. This contention does not include any decisiveness, yet rather just pushes the inquiry further for one could request that what created God exist? A run of the mill answer to this is God does not have any significant bearing to the circumstances and end results law expressed and exists in light of the fact that. It appears to be difficult to contend this however one could without much of a stretch envision that some matter just exists as well; and that it doesn 't make a difference to the circumstances and end results administer yet exists in light of the fact that.…

    • 1071 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This argument seems to be based on an assumption, on the part of Al-Ghazali, that there is a sense of possibility which is external and above God: one that even God must remain bound by. This can be seen in the juxtaposition of the conclusion and the sixth premise. In the conclusion, Al-Ghazali is content with the claim that God cannot have created a better creation since such a creation is not possible. In premise six, however, Al-Ghazali is quite unhappy with the notion that God is not able to create a creation which is both possible and better than the one in which we live. Al-Ghazali, then, does not take issue with the claim that God cannot do something.…

    • 1377 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Free Will Problem

    • 1005 Words
    • 5 Pages

    the PKG god) and though using god seems like it would cancel out any question that free will does in fact exists, in actuality bringing god into it makes things more complicated. The concept of free choice and a god that is both all knowing and all good is paradoxical because if god is not ignorant of our choices and is aware of them before we even make them, then how are our decisions made freely? In addition, how is god all good? After all, a god that is all good would surely interfere if he knew that a choice made would cause suffering. To conclude, if one believes in the PKG one must also admit that the free will does not actually exist because that would mean that god is unaware of the choices one makes and therefore is not all-knowing or all good.…

    • 1005 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For God to have failed to exist something had the power to prevent his existence, but God by definition is all powerful. Therefore, for God to exist his existence is necessary. In scenario two, God could have existed but doesn’t. In this situation something would have caused God to exist or he came into existence at a moment in time without a cause. Both explantion go against the eternal nature of God, which is necessary to be the greatest conceivable being.…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    My own view on faith is that it is not a strong enough argument for proof of Gods existence. I agree with Dawkins that to believe something to be true there must be some kind of real evidence. I believe that most people would agree that evidence should be required to prove God exists but many people would argue there is no evidence against God’s…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Moral goodness comes from the people themselves and is not linked to belief in God. Conclusion Pascal’s Wager is based on using rewards/punishments to make a decision. In theory, this is a logical way to make a decision for a simple problem. However, since there are so many variables unaccounted for in the wager of should you believe in God or not, Pascal’s line of reasoning is inapplicable. Because of the reasons listed in Section Two of this paper, I found the premises of the Wager to be false.…

    • 1176 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Philosophical educator Crash Course, stresses that if the rules of morality are taken from something other than God, then why can others not just find that source and figure out morality for themselves (Crash Course). God no longer needs to command actions if the knowledge of it is available outside of him. This eliminates God from DCT, leaving their view without a commander. DCT is thus false because it is no longer up to God to command moral actions and DCT strictly states the opposite. Although DCT is flawed, Divine Command Theorist could possibly object the Euthyphro Dilemma in efforts to prove their…

    • 1259 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays