Cost Of Animal Testing

1452 Words 6 Pages
With over one hundred million animals killed in testing every year in the United States alone, alternative methods should begin being ushered in. Every day animals are being harmed in the name of “forward progress,” while every day alternative methods are being discovered and explored. As scientific data is gathered on alternative methods, testing on animals becomes more and more outdated. Animal testing is outdated and should not be considered helpful anymore because it is cruel, pointless, and ridiculously expensive. The Animal Welfare Act of 1966 was established to create satisfactory standards for the treatment of animals. Animals used for research should be protected by the Animal Welfare Act, however, the animals excluded from this …show more content…
The United States spends approximately fifteen million dollars a year (“National Toxicology Program”) on research and testing performed on animals. With alternatives costing a margin of the amount as their animal counterparts, it seems only logical to push forward with alternative testing methods. In animal testing regarding skin corrosion from chemical exposure, the Draize rabbit skin test will cost nearly $1,800. Alternatively, the Epiderm™ Skin Test will cost $850, and the Corrositex® Membrane Barrier test only costs $500 (“Cost of Animal and Non-Animal …show more content…
Animal testing is outdated and should not be considered helpful anymore because it is cruel, pointless, and ridiculously expensive. We cannot morally continue animal experimentation simply because animals cannot give consent, they are treated terribly in laboratories, and there are safer, more accurate, and cheaper alternatives that should be being put to use. Animal experimentation is useless and even causes companies to lose money, so why would we continue practicing it? The answer is that people are completely terrified of change, even if it could benefit every single person on

Related Documents