Cosmological Argument

Great Essays
COSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENT: MAKING THE BELIEF IN GOD RATIONAL
TOPIC: Of the arguments for the existence of God (the cosmological [first cause] argument and the teleological [design] argument found in Hume, and the ontological argument of Anselm), which is the best in your view? What is the structure of the argument? What is a potential objection to the argument? Is there an adequate response to that objection? Is the argument sufficient to make belief in God rational? Why or why not? When comparing Demea’s cosmological argument, Anselm 's ontological argument, and Hume’s teleological argument, I believe the cosmological argument presented by Demea is the sufficient argument in making the belief of the philosopher 's God (all powerful, all
…show more content…
The first opposition he brings upon the cosmological argument is that “Nothing is demonstrable, unless the contrary applies a contradiction.” This opposing argument says that if we conceive something to exist, we also conceive that thing to not exist; and there is no bring in which its existence implies a contradiction. If this is the case, then there is no being thats existence proves to be necessary. Cleanthes also asks “Why may not the material universe be the necessarily existent Being, according to this pretended explication of necessity?” (Cleanthes, First Philosophy, pg.80.) This argument is bringing to light the question of whether or not we can assume we know God’s properties, if we in fact cannot settle on exactly what the philosopher 's God can or cannot do. There may be an attribute of God’s that makes his existence necessary that we simply are unaware of and cannot dismiss. The last opposing argument Cleanthes presents is him objecting that “it is absurd to seek a cause for an external succession.” This is because if we are seeking for a cause for an infinite causal chain, than we are assuming there was a cause for the external succession. If we assume there is a cause, there must have been a cause for that one as well, which cannot be possible seeing as the chain is already infinite and there was no beginning. Therefore, a causal chain simply cannot have a cause. The final argument opposing Demea’s cosmological argument is Cleanthes saying that the parts not need represent its whole. This means that something may not appear similar to its earlier state and if every effect is explained correctly by its proceeding cause, then there need not to be a cause for the infinite chain of every effect. I do see the logic in Cleanthes objections and I do agree with his objections in regards to the argumentation of the cosmological argument. When

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    It was Thomas Merton, a Catholic English writer who once said “To say that I am made in the image of God is to say that love is the reason for my existence, for God is love. Love is my true identity. Selflessness is my true self. Love is my true character. Love is my name” (Merton).…

    • 1204 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Moreover, who made God's maker? The risk of a boundless relapse of makers, each hypothesized with a specific end goal to clarify the presence of that coming to it, looms. By chance that there is a vast relapse of makers, however, at that point there is no first maker, no extreme reason for the universe, no God. Maybe, at that point, the theist ought to keep up that God doesn't have a maker, that he is an uncaused reason. In the event that uncaused presence is conceivable, however, at that point there is no compelling reason to hypothesize a God that made the universe; if uncaused presence is conceivable, at that point the universe could be…

    • 1807 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cleanthes Vs Demea Essay

    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Philosophy Final Paper In this paper, I will argue that Philo offers better arguments for explanation of God’s existence than Demea and Cleanthes. During Hume’s days, the 1700s, science was not very advance and many philosophical arguments were based off of empirical observations. This paper contains information regarding how the argument between the three panned out and contains my thoughts on the conversation. While I do not have all the answers on these matters, I will provide my views and arguments in hopes of presenting a different perspective.…

    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Philosophy has been plagued with the subject of religion since the dawn of time. Each philosopher having their own opinions, many attempts have been made to prove and disprove their opinion and the opinions of others. The existence of God, a single, supreme being who created the heavens and the earth, is a controversial topic, but even among those who believe in the existence of God, finding a way to explain such existence has been nigh impossible. An 18th century philosopher, David Hume attempted to establish his opinion on the existence of God by critiquing the widely accepted ideals set forth by Descartes.…

    • 1206 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    An unending chain solely of dependent beings has no cause, since it has no cause from within or without the unending chain of dependent beings; (3) Everything that exists has a cause; From premises (2) and (3) we also conclude: (4) An unending chain solely of dependent…

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    How can something that does not need to be given existence actually exist to give everything else existence? The preceding question is one that many atheist use to prove that theist are at a more uncomfortable state than atheist. Along with cosmological proof comes ontological proof. Here everything is based entirely…

    • 1532 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In review of the three arguments related to the Proof for the Existence of a god, I found all three arguments to be very convincing, opinionating and interesting. These arguments appeared to be based on personal opinions, while convincing the reader to their beliefs from either a religious view, logical view or natural purpose view. The concept they all appeared to have in common was that they all believed god did exist, which I found to be very enlightening. My impression of each argument would be in the following comments.…

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    His argument states that God is the most perfect thing possible. After defining god as the greatest conceivable thing he asks “what is greater god as an idea or god as an existing thing?” if it is agreed that existing is always better than not existing god as an existing being is greater than god as an idea, therefore god must exist as if god is just an idea then he is not the most perfect conceivable thing. God must exist by…

    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This weeks discussion forum I chose to reference Anselm's Ontological Argument for the existence of God, and evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of his argument. From reading I determined that one of the main strengths of Anselm's argument is showing that the concept of God is not illogical, and that even a non-believer has to have a concept of God in their minds, and due to this a concept of God exists in reality. The argument also flourishes that a clear and rational conclusion can be drawn from it, leaving the argument with the only possible answer that God does exist. It also offers an actual proof of God's existence which can be logically debated rather than relying on unpredictable evidence. When I read more into weaknesses of the argument…

    • 220 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Nagel's Argument Analysis

    • 1079 Words
    • 5 Pages

    One the first arguments is that everything must have a cause. A cause 1 must have a cause of cause 2, which obviously must have a cause 3 and it goes on. When these causes are bound to go on, and they indefinitely do, it is considered unintellectual and uncalled for. Nevertheless, there is only one cause and cause 1 is God.…

    • 1079 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Here, the philosopher Cleanthes uses an inductive argument to lead to his conclusion: that God in fact exists. Unlike deductive arguments, inductive arguments offer conclusions that not are not only supported by its premises, but may be weakened by the generalizations that are drawn which might not be true in any similar circumstances. For example, there may be an argument which states the following, “A majority of the students who attend Dawson are vegan. Therefore, Lucas, who is also a student a Dawson, is a vegan as…

    • 1772 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Anselm’s Ontological Argument Anselm creates the Ontological argument with one primary goal. He claims to succeed in developing an argument of the existence of God without the requirement of actual proof. Anselm 's reasoning and argument only gives a mere opinion on the topic of the existence of God. He formulates a two part hypothesis consisting of: God exists and God has always existed. Anselm’s Ontological argument expresses accusations that are simply in his favor or his outlook on God.…

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In other words, the cosmological argument is a philosophical argument, which means that everything has a cause for the reason it is there, and that there must have been a first cause, and that this first cause was itself uncaused. Some say the cosmological argument is the most logical argument in the eyes of western logicians…

    • 1375 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Existence of God This argument about the existence of God, better known as the cosmological argument, begins with the late philosopher Aristotle. Similar to a modern day natural scientist, he believed that we could ascertain more about the world and the very fundamental nature of things within our world just by observing and recording. In many ways Aristotle resemble a modern day artist, a person who goes through life experiencing and watching all different types of energy that’s around, visually records this information and help others by spreading this knowledge to the mass. Aristotle too, would look and study the world and its patterns that were around him in order to gain insight into his world.…

    • 1210 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Before I explain that, I am going to tell you what is cosmological argument. The cosmological Argument (Greek "cosmos"= orderly whole): a posterior, deductive. "god" is the "first (uncaused) cause "of the cosmos. it is deductive, so it is a candidate for soundness. Then the cosmological argument is the argument that the existence of the world or universe is strong evidence for the existence of a God who created it.…

    • 1424 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays