Aristotle Habit And Virtue Analysis

Superior Essays
How does Aristotle’s teaching explain the correlation between habit and virtue? An interpretation of virtue is that it is the behavior of showing high ethical moral standards. A morally excellent person is made-up of virtues that are valued as noble, honest, and honorable. An honest individual exemplifies positive traits by doing what is right no matter what the consequences. This individual does not waver against his own desires. Virtues are universally known by all as the basic qualities which are essential for happiness. We can practice virtue and take control of our life direction based upon our habits. According to Aristotle, moral virtue is a trait of one’s character. In the “Nicomachaen Ethics”, Aristotle argues that we acquire virtues …show more content…
We are responsible for our actions because we perform them voluntarily. Aristotle’s criteria to distinguish said, “First, if he acts knowingly; second, if he acts by choosing and by choosing the actions in question for their own sake; and third, if he acts while being in a steady and unwavering state.” There is a difference between to act virtuously and to be virtuous. For instance, someone could behave virtuously by accident but their intention was not to do good. Virtue, however, is acquired by habit because to acquire virtue you would have already needed to act virtuously for the action to become habitual. Aristotle says “Yet one ought to say not only this – that virtue is a characteristic – but also what sort of characteristic it is. So it must be stated that every virtue both brings that of which it is the virtue into a good condition and causes work belonging to that thing to be done well.” (1106a) Virtue is what makes a thing perform its function appropriately. The habit from which the person becomes good is virtue, because virtue is a mean between two vices. Habit is defined as a regular pattern of behavior, often unconscious thought. We can become virtuous through habit. Habits are formed during our early life. An action deals with the particulars and specifics as to what is essential to accomplish the good and become virtuous, which would be in between the deficiency and excess. We always aim at the good but often become ignorant as to what is the actual good is end up and doing wrong. Aristotle would say it is through habit that a person accomplishes virtue and strives for a good and happy

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Aristotle believed that virtues were the highest qualities of humanity. Virtues ethics doesn't focus on what is right and what is wrong in regards to rules. Instead, Aristotle chose to study why certain people behave the way they do in a variety of situations. The traits these people have are what makes them virtuous.…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Aristotle’s ethics are virtue ethics. This view states that in order to be moral, one must do as the just man would do and for the same reasons. Aristotle states that morality cannot be learned but it is innate and is a skill that must be sharpened with practice. Aristotle defends this view by saying that there is no clear-cut ethics. Everything should be taken on a case-by-case basis and by using the model of the moral man one is able to do this.…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Throughout Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle expands on what are the requirements for people to be considered good, or virtuous. He explains how political science is the ultimate science, since it deals not only with individual good, but with a societal good, which involves leadership in the most significant manner. For him, being virtuous is a necessary component of good life, which is one that is lived well, and may be perceived as “happy.” For practical purposes, however, in a world where one must interact with others, it is difficult to reach a consensus on the patterns of behavior that can be seen as virtuous. Nonetheless, Aristotle provides a most thorough structure to living virtuously, which he opens to be molded to the circumstances and…

    • 1171 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    It’s only possible through a virtuous character. Like mentioned earlier, virtues of character pertain to ethical practices. Once our virtue becomes a form of nature to us, they form our actions and decisions. They are deeply rooted because they define the way we feel pleasure and pain. If we have been habituated to feel pleasure and pain the right way, then those attitudes become second nature to us. The way that this ties into virtue and acting virtuously is because acting virtuously is not the same as being virtuous, but being virtuous is the means to becoming virtuous. It’s all about what’s at the root of habituation, and that is…

    • 1885 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To do so is to achieve eudaimonia, which is a fully-realized existence commonly referred to as happiness (Soccio 175-176). One must live their life with good habits, which can be defined as virtue or character. These habits define who one is. According to this model, if one is habitually lazy, then one is characteristically lazy, is not achieving their full function, and has a character deficit. To live a life with good habits and moderation will lead to one living fully alive and achieving their function. According to Aristotle, this is how one can achieve the pursuit of…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Aristotle notes that most people agree that the highest ‘good’ is happiness, or eudaemonia, yet most people have trouble concurring to what prompts happiness. To uncover the path to happiness, “One must begin from what is known,” (Nic. Ethics 1095b2-3) which is extrapolated from Aristotle’s example of an immature young person. Recurrently, Aristotle has not lucidly defined how to confirm what a person knows. So, Aristotle explains that habituation fabricates what he has coined as the ‘that’ which is a principal, or a holistic understanding that does not require a given person to further question, or does not require a “why,” as Aristotle explained it. Moreover, Aristotle begins to list variants of lifestyles in an attempt to explain how one should or should not persevere towards happiness. He describes four specific ways of life: those who live lavishly, those who strive for honor, those who strive for pleasure, and those who are virtuous. Whereafter, Aristotle, not uncommonly, begins to dispute why these four lifestyles do not validly induce happiness. He claims that those who are wealthy and live luxuriously obtain revenue on an account for something else, i.e., money is used furthermore. Further, Aristotle explains that those who live in seek of honor are recognized as honorable by others; therefore, honor is not self-sufficient considering it is reliant upon…

    • 1112 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    He first distinguishes between voluntary and involuntary actions, citing actions done by ignorance and by force as the only conditions of an involuntary action. According to Aristotle, an action done by force “has its principle outside the person forced, who contributes nothing,” and an action done by ignorance is caused by ignorance of the particulars (Aristotle, 31). These particulars are specific aspects of a situation and Aristotle identifies them as: “who is doing it; what he is doing; about what or to what he is doing it;…what he is doing it with…; for what result…; in what way” (Aristotle, 32). An important distinction here exists between the terms ‘by ignorance’ and ‘in ignorance.’ Aristotle denounces that an action done in ignorance be considered involuntary. He gives the example of a man who does something when drunk – such actions, while done in ignorance, are still voluntary because the man made the choice to get drunk in the first place. Therefore, he is still responsible for his actions when drunk. This precise distinction leaves little room for an action to fall into the category of something that is involuntary, leaving the majority of actions to be voluntary and therefore a personal responsibility. When Aristotle describes a voluntary action as one that “has its principle in the agent himself, knowing the particulars that constitute the action”…

    • 1843 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To live a life of politics, Aristotle argues that happiness can be earned by moral values. There are two types of virtue--intellectual and moral. Intellectual virtues are learned by instruction and moral virtues are learned by habit and constant practice. A virtue is a Golden mean-- a mean that lies between the two extremes. For example, courage is a virtue between cowardice and rashness. Unlike Kant, Aristotle believed that virtue could be measured; and to be virtuous according to Aristotle, a person had to contain goodwill for the greatest good and make choices based on that. When it comes to pleasure and pain, Aristotle states that having the right attitude towards these two feelings is an important habit in forming moral virtue. For example, a greedy eater might feel inappropriate pleasure when presented with food and inappropriate pain when deprived of food; a moderate person will experience pleasure from abstaining from such indulgence.…

    • 1199 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    31). According to the philosopher, virtue is a ‘characteristic’ rather than as opposed to a ‘passion’ or ‘capacity’. This characteristic is determined by an individual’s choice. These choices must be determined in mean of wisdom and rationale, which is the implication in which it is labeled a virtue. In justification, an individual is permitted to act in accordance to a particular virtue that is most appropriate for the circumstances. This behavior is founded on middle ground-that is the virtue-situated between what is known as an ‘excess’ and the other being a ‘deficiency’, and the two also being classified as ‘vices’. Aristotle proceeds with certain examples relating to fear, anger, greed, etc. The two vices that were previously mentioned - the ‘excess’ and ‘deficiency’- pertain virtue based on morality residing with ‘passions’ and the actions of an individual (Aristotle, Bartlett, & Collins, 2012, p. 34). In terms of an ‘excess’, a person’s actions should not be acted out on. Aristotle’s philosophy also implies making decisions that are worthy of praise and admiration by…

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Aristotle argues everyone can accomplish the best only in virtue of his inherent virtue. He describes the virtue “being of two kinds, intellectual and moral, intellectual virtue in the main owes both and its growth to teaching (for which reason it requires experience and time), while moral virtue comes about as a result of habit, whence also its name (ethike) is one that is formed by a slight variation from the word ethos (habit)” (20). Thus, no one of our ethical virtues is naturally generated, because there is no natural thing can be changed by habit. Our virtue is neither produced by nature nor contrary to nature. Nature gives us the ability to accept virtue, and the maturity of this ability is accomplished by habit. Aristotle believes virtue is a state of character concerned with choice, and the best of choice of virtue is intermediate. For example, courage is between recklessness and cowardice. If one avoids everything for fear, does not dare to insist, one will become a coward; on the contrary, fearless, rampage on everything, one will become a boor. In all admirable emotions and actions, there is an intermediate…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In the Nicomachean Ethics, we are provided with Aristotle’s philosophy regarding the nature of virtue. He aims at explaining what virtue is, how it is acquired, and how it is related to both happiness (eudaimonia) and friendships. Overall, Aristotle is addressing the questions of: “What is a human being’s telos (purpose)?” and “What is the highest good?” It is by answering these questions that we will be able to see how Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics is related to both Socrates and Epictetus’ philosophy, not to mention how it has contributed to my understanding of generosity, and virtue overall.…

    • 1649 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Aristotle’s basic view of ethics is that people do everything that they can for the sake of happiness and that the human virtues are those of the soul, not the body. His theory on virtues explores how morality, which is closely connected to our functions or purpose as human beings, involves obtaining good character traits, which create virtuous individuals. Aristotle’s virtue theory claims that activities have values and specify that it is required for humans to assign a specific character trait to activities depending on the differences of the activities to create a predetermined value. A virtue is a habit or an acquired human quality of character that allows humans to achieve personal happiness while vices are the opposite and ruin an individual 's chances and goals of achieving personal happiness. While the main motive of consideration for the utilitarian is the consequence of direct actions, the people are the primary object of consideration in the virtue theory. . The Virtue Theory claims that an action is good if it 's chosen by a person based on virtue and bad if chosen based on…

    • 1664 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For Aristotle he believes that inclinations are semi-rational, responsive to reason and can be changed by reason. For example if you know something is wrong you should be able to will yourself not to want it anymore because of reason. The level of virtue deemed to an action can be imagined on a scale from not virtuous to most virtuous, while in Kant’s case there are only two options for actions; having moral worth or not having moral worth. Much like Kant, Aristotle has his own way of determining if an action if virtuous. Firstly the person must have knowledge that the action is virtuous, meaning through their reason they must know this is the right thing to do. Secondly the person must choose this action because it is the most virtuous thing. Finally the person must do this with firm and unchanging character, meaning they have stable inclinations in line with reason. This is why for Aristotle that the reason and inclinations are not much different and they both are morally relevant. This is why Aristotle says we can change our inclinations through habitual actions. This is also why I feel Aristotle’s view is correct while Kant’s is…

    • 1098 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In order to understand Aristotle’s theory of virtue, you must first understand his theory of good. He starts with determining the functionality of an object and identifying its specific function. Once you find the function of something (humans included), you can understand how it was built and determine its ability to function well. Everything according to Aristotle is created and given a specific purpose. This idea would be beneficial for the whole of society because if everyone understands their purpose or functionality or is working towards it, the society will always be working towards a positive goal of self-sufficiency and sustainability. If a society was led by Epicurus’ idea with humans maximizing their happiness and decreasing their suffering, happiness comes at a cost. In a hedonistic society, the cost of…

    • 1777 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The next step is to define what a good moral virtue is and how to keep this idea in habitual practice. Aristotle terms virtue as “the organization of desire which enables man to live a truly happy life.” (Aristotle the desire to understand, 164) Though this definition of virtue gives us a glimpse of what this means Aristotle dives deeper to explain this concept. From the Nicomachean Ethics; Aristotle states a virtue must “render good the thing in itself of which it is the excellence and causes it to perform its function well.” (41) Every person in this world feels emotions, we are not blamed for this because this is an occurrence that happens voluntary in nature. But we as humans are responsible for how we act in accordance to our emotions. Hence, Aristotle shows us that virtues do not constitute to our emotions or capacities, rather they are dispositions or habits of practice. For example, every human being feels the emotion of anger, which is within our nature. But if we let our emotions control our actions it will show us we do not have a good moral virtue. Making the good life impossible to reach. Put another example in…

    • 2041 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays