Corpus Juris Civilis Advantages And Disadvantages

Advantages and Disadvantages of The Corpus Juris Civilis

Roman Law is the law of ancient Rome it is known for the inheritance which the Romans left us, Roman law is highly important as it influenced the world especially the western world and it is the most developed out of all the systems of the past. In addition it is the first pediment of law and society and its history can be traced over a long period. The latter, provides the foundation for numerous legal systems and this is reflected in Tony Honore's words who is a British lawyer and jurists known for his work in Roman law . Honore said that : "The European Union of the Treaty of Rome is not a revival of the Roman Empire. The inheritance from Rome and of Roman Law has however renewed …show more content…
Justinian claimed that since the Digesto would become the law, no lawyer could interpret the law differently. If it was, the penalty for digression was the capital punishment which in a way was a drastic measure. Law can be interpreted differently it is dictatorial to punish people who have a different interpretation therefore this could be one of the book's disadvantages. In addition, another problem was that when Justinian ordered the preparation of the Digesto he wanted to preserve the classical juristic law yet also produce a body of law that would fulfill contemporary needs. Yet, accomplishing both these objective was impossible. In reviewing and arranging the judicial literature, the commissioners discovered that many problems had been highly controversial among the past legal experts and remained so for centuries. Furthermore, Another disadvantage which the Corpus Juris Civilis faced was that there were various textbooks not just one and Justinian’s aim was to preserve all the relevant information in just one text book. It can be argued also that the Corpus Juris Civilis represents only one phase of the Roman era and so there is still a lot of unknown information. In connection to this one can also argue that when the Corpus Juris Civilis was established all the other previous sources were lost, it reduced the great amount of material which had been gathered, all the previous legislation and works of authors became obsolete. They had no relevance to the law because the corpus juris civilis was the essential tool box for all legal practitioners. Finally, Justinian was a barbarian he reigned over people who spoke Greek yet called themselves Romans and he produced a book in Latin therefore few of the citizens could understand