Corporal Punishment Is Wrong

Senior Research Paper “Corporal punishment is as humiliating to him who gives it as for him who receives it; it is ineffective besides, Neither shame nor physical pain have any other effect than a hard one (Ellen Key).” Modern parenting is made to in steel character into a child by using physical discipline. It’s not humilating for the child to be spanked, but it is humiliating for the parent to incorporate this method. Religion, mankind’s responsibility, individual concerns, pretext, family concerns, and inhumane or humane demonstrates why physical discipline is not a form of child abuse. Disciplining a child using corporal punishment to establish moral boundaries is an acceptable form of disciplining a child. Religion plays a role in spanking, …show more content…
So it can help save a child’s life and help them create healthy routines. Spanking helps develop a better future for the child and their community. There was A 30-year study in New Zealand, that showed no negative effects of spanking. It actually, appeared to be high-functioning for members of society (Mrozek and Quist 1).Corporal punishment is proven to make a child a high-functioning member of their society. Far as, teaching sportsmanship, respecting the elderly, and acting proper in public. Furthermore, corporal punishment could help save a child’s life. The only fears a child should have is the thought of staying out of danger. Spanking promotes a healthy fear for children to understand. For example, a child should fear if they are in danger-it might save their lives to get off the road when the 18 foot truck is bearing them down (Ogechi Ohalee 1). Children need to know that spanking keeps them from danger. By spanking the child, it let’s them know that they should not do it again. Most convincingly, physical discipline teaches a child to make healthy routines and choices. When a guardian uses a form of corporal punishment, it gives them control over that disciplinary action. A child knows that every wrongdoing gets physical consequence, and this allows them to respect authority (Youth Leadership Blog 1). Once the child has received that temporary pain from the parent. It …show more content…
Where spanking can be used less often, parents don’t have to worry about their kids growing up wrong, and the child will receive sometype of spanking either way in the future. With the form of spanking, it can be used less often. The spanking procedure can strengthen time-out’s effectiveness and can reduce a parent’s need to use spanking independently (Goodparent.org 2). The spanking procedure is a beneficial tactic, where it doesn’t have to be used in a great amount to get the right results. Surely, parents do not need to worry about their kids growing up wrong, if they use physical discipline. In a positive family setting, spanking has been found to be positive for children with the non-use of illegal, attending church, and having a “happy” parental marriage (Goodparent.org 4). In a family setting, spanking impacts the overall parental marriage, because it’s a tool of discipline for the entire family to follow. Moreover, a child will receive some type of spanking, either if it’s by the law or the economy. Authoritative parents who balance firm control and favor corporal punishment, have children that are achievement oriented, friendly toward peers, and cooperative with adults (Goodparent.org 3). The long-term effect of physical discipline will leave the child with success in the end. So the child does not have to learn a hardship lesson from the world. A parent should spank their