Mercola’s (2013) article reviews corn ethanol and its relationship with the environment and how it impacts it since in 2007, Congress made it a requirement to have gasoline that is mixed with ethanol, in an attempt to reduce the United States’ dependence on foreign oil. When this was researched, it was found that a higher demand for corn led farmers to destroy untapped land and turn it into planting grounds. This led to the need for more fertilizer, “increasing the use of nitrogen fertilizers by more than one billion pounds” (Dr. Mercola, 2013). The rise in nitrogen fertilizer use caused an increase in water pollution, and agricultural irrigation also plays a role in limiting our freshwater. The increase in fertilizer has also caused dead zones, leaving contaminated river water no longer able to hold aquatic life. There is a negative impact here when looking at the domino effect that corn ethanol has had on the environment. The more acres that were used to create corn led for the need of more soil which caused the unnecessary destruction of more top soil and contributed the waste of our even now limited water supply (Dr. Mercola, …show more content…
This is because corn will grow year after year and will continue to contribute as biofuel. The corn ethanol will also not leave the environmental footprint behind that gasoline does and emits less carbon dioxide, which could help put an end to global warming. This, however, still leads to environmental issues because, though corn ethanol is better for the environment than gasoline, the process to make ethanol from the corn is not. According to this article it takes a gallon and a half of gasoline to produce one gallon of ethanol (Hutton, 2011). This shows that there definitely is potential with much room to grow, but for now corn ethanol is not the